Why we harass nerds and freaks: A formal theory of student culture and norms

Journal of School Health

Volumn 74, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 235-251

  Bishop, John H ^a   Bishop, Matthew ^a   Bishop, Michael ^a   Gelbwasser, Lara ^a   Green, Shanna ^a   Peterson, Erica ^a   Rubinsztaj, Anna ^a   Zuckerman, Andrew ^a  

^a 390 Ives Hall ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; CHILD BEHAVIOR; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONFERENCE PAPER; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; GROUP PSYCHOLOGY; HIGH SCHOOL; HYPOTHESIS; LEADERSHIP; SELF ESTEEM; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL LEARNING; SOCIAL STATUS; STUDENT; THEORY; TIME MANAGEMENT;

EID: 5444269106     PISSN: 00224391     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb08280.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Rose L, Gallup A, Elam S. The 29th annual Phi Delta Kappa/Gallup Poll of the Publics Attitudes Toward the Public Schools. Phi Delta Kappan. 1997;September:41-56.
2. Barron JM, Ewing BT, Waddell GR. The effects of high school athletic participation on education and labor market outcomes. Rev Econ Stat. 2000;83(3):409-421.
3. Bishop J, Mane F, Bishop M, Moriarty J. The role of end-of-course exams and minimum competency exams in standards-based reforms. In: Ravitch D, ed. Brookings Papers on Education Policy. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution; 2001:267-345.
4. Rosenbaum J. Beyond College for All. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation; 2001:67.
5. Grubb N. The varied economic returns to postsecondary education: new evidence from the national longitudinal study of the class of 1972. J Human Resources. 1993;28(2):365-382.
6. Coleman J. The Adolescent Society. New York, NY: Free Press; 1961.
7. Tannenbaum AJ. Adolescents' Attitudes Toward Academic Brilliance [dissertation]. New York, NY: New York University; 1960.
8. Brown BB. Peer groups and peer cultures. In: Feldman SS, Elliot GR, eds. At the Threshold: The Developing Adolescent. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1990:171-196.
9. Kandel D. Homophily, selection and socialization in adolescent friendships. Am J Sociology. 1978;427-436.
10. Cohen JM. Sources of peer group homogeneity. Soc Educ. 1997;50:227-241.
11. Talbot M. Girls just want to be mean. The New York Times, Magazine section, Feb. 24, 2002.
12. Damico SB. The effects of clique membership upon academic achievement. Adolescence. 1975;10(37):93-100.
13. Brown B, Lohr MJ, Trujillo C. Multiple crowds and multiple life styles: adolescents' perceptions of peer-group stereotypes. In: Muuss RE, ed. Adolescent Behavior and Society: A Book of Readings. New York, NY: Random House; 1990:30-36.
14. Brown BB. Peer groups and peer cultures. In: Feldman SS, Elliot GR, eds. At the Threshold: the Developing Adolescent. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1990:171-196.
15. Sandstrom MJ, Coie JD. A developmental perspective on peer rejection: mechanisms of stability and change. Child Dev. 1999;70(4):956.
16. Schwartz D, Dodge KA, Coie JD. The emergence of chronic peer victimization in boys' play groups. Child Dev. 1993;64:1755
17. Bishop JH. Nerd harassment, incentives, school priorities and learning. In: Mayer S, Peterson P, eds. Earning and Learning: How Schools Matter. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press; 1999:231-280.
18. Persico N, Postlewaitte A, Silverman D. The effect of adolescent experience on labor market outcomes: the case of height. University of Pennsylvania; 2001:1-37.
19. Eder D, Evans C, Parker S. School Talk. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press; 1995:1-198.
20. Brown BB, Steinberg L. Academic Achievement and Social Acceptance. 1990:60.
21. Cairns RB, Cairns BD. Lifelines and Risks: Pathways of Youth in our Time. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1994:91.
22. National Center for Education Statistics. Digest of Education Statistics, 1993:137.