School connectedness and the transition into and out of health-risk behavior among adolescents: A comparison of social belonging and teacher support

Journal of School Health

Volumn 74, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 284-292

  McNeely, Clea ^a   Falci, Christina ^b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ADOLESCENT; CHILD BEHAVIOR; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE; EMOTIONAL ATTACHMENT; EMOTIONALITY; FEMALE; HEALTH HAZARD; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MENTAL DEVELOPMENT; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PREVALENCE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCHOOL; SOCIAL ASPECT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SUPPORT GROUP; TEACHER;

EID: 5444264262     PISSN: 00224391     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb08285.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Barber BK, Olsen JA. Socialization in context: connection, regulation, and autonomy in the family, school and neighborhood, and with peers. J Adolesc Res. 1997;12(2):287-315.
2. Miller B. Families Matter. Washington, DC: National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy; 1998.
3. Karcher MJ. Connectedness and school violence: a framework for developmental interventions. In: Gerler E, ed. Handbook of School Violence. Haworth Press; 2003.
4. Crosnoe R. Social capital and the interplay of families and schools. J Marriage Fam. 2004;66:267-280.
5. National Research Council. Engaging Schools: Fostering High School Students' Motivation to Learn. Washington. DC: National Academies of Science; 2003.
6. Rutter MB, Maughan P, Mortimore J, Ouston, Smith A. Fifteen Thousand Hours: Secondary Schools and Their Effects on Children. Somerset: Open Books; 1979.
7. Eccles JS, Early D, Frasier K, Belansky E, McCarthy K. The relation of connection, regulation, and support for autonomy to adolescents' functioning. J Adolesc Res. 1997;12:263-286.
8. Goodenow C, Grady K. The relationship of school belonging and friends' values to academic motivation among urban adolescent students. J Exp Educ. 1993;62:60-71.
9. Battistich VD, Solomon D, Watson KM, Schnaps E. Schools as communities, poverty levels of student populations, and students' attitudes, motive and performance: a multilevel analysis. Am Educ Res J. 1995;32:627-658.
10. Battin-Pearson S, Newcomb MD, Abbot RD, Hill KG, Catalano RF, Hawkins JD. Predictors of early high school dropout: a test of five theories. J Educ Psychol. 2000;92(3):568-582.
11. Connell J, Wellborn J. Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: a motivational analysis of self-system processes. In: Gunnar M, Sroufe L, eds. Self Processes in Development: Minnesota. Symposium on Child Development. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum; 1991;23:43-77.
12. Battistich V, Hom A. The relationship between students' sense of their school as a community and their involvement in problem behaviors. Am J Public Health. 1997;87:1997-2001.
13. Resnick MD, Bearman PS, Blum RW, et al. Protecting adolescents from harm: findings from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. JAMA. 1997;278:823-832.
14. Jenkins PH. School delinquency and the school social bond. J Res Crime and Delinquency. 1997;34(3):337-367.
15. Roeser R, Eccles J, Strobel K. Linking the study of schooling and mental health: selected issues and empirical illustrations at the level of the individual. Educ Psychologist. 1998;33:153-176.
16. Hawkins JD, Guo J, Hill KG, Battin-Pearson S, Abbot RD. Long-term effects of the Seattle Social Development intervention on school bonding trajectories. Appl Dev Sci. 2001;5:225-236.
17. Catalano RF, Haggerty KP, Osterle S, Fleming CB, Hawkins JD. The importance of bonding to school for healthy development: findings from the Social Development Research Group. 2003; unpublished manuscript.
18. Wingspread Conference. Wingspread Declaration on School Connections. J Sch Health. 2004;74(7):233.
19. Bollen K, Hoyle RH. Perceived cohesion: a conceptual and empirical examination. Social Forces. 1991;69:479-504.
20. Wehalge GG, Rutter RA, Smith GA, Lesko N, Fernandez RR. Reducing the risk: schools as communities of support. New York, NY: The Falmer Press; 1989.
21. Rosenfeld LB, Richman JM, Bowen GL. Low social support among at-risk adolescents. Social Work Educ. 1998;20:245-260.
22. Hawkins JD, Weis JG. The Social Development Model: An integrated approach to delinquency prevention. J Primary Prev. 1985;6:73-97.
23. Udry JR. The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health), Waves I & II, 1994-1996 [machine-readable data file and documentation]. Chapel Hill, NC: Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; 1998.
24. McNeely CA. Connection to school as an indicator of positive youth development. In: Lippman L, Moore K, eds. Indicators of Positive Youth Development. Search Institute Series on Developmentally Attentive Community and Society. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press; (forthcoming).
25. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 8.0. College Station, Tex: Stata Corp; 2003.
26. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons; 1989.
27. Johnston LD, O'Malley PM, Bachman JG. Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975-2002. Volume 1: Secondary school students (NIH Publication No. 03-5375). Bethesda, Md: National Institute on Drug Abuse; 2003.
28. Stanton-Salazar RD. Manufacturing Hope and Despair: The School, and Kin Support Networks of U.S.-Mexican Youth. New York, NY: Teachers College Press; 2001.
29. Eccles JS, Midgefield C, Wigfield A. Development during adolescence: the impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents' experiences in schools and in families. Am Psychologist. 1993;48:90-101.