Rubrics cubed: Tying grades to assessment to reduce faculty workloads

ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 12359-12364

  Blanchard, Susan M ^a,b   McCord, Marian G ^a,b   Mente, Peter L ^a,b   Lalush, David S ^a,b   Abrams, C Frank ^a,c   Loboa, Elizabeth G ^a,b   Nagle, H Tory ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Department of Biological Engineering ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT DATA; ASSESSMENT WORKLOAD; GRADING RUBRIC; PROGRAM OUTCOMES;

APPROXIMATION THEORY; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; LEARNING SYSTEMS; STANDARDIZATION; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

EID: 5444263127     PISSN: 01901052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (4)

1. Carter, M. What is the difference between assessing a program and assessing a student? http://www.ncsu.edu/provost/academic_programs/uapr/FAQ/ UAPRFAQwhatdifassessstudentvsprograms.html, 2003.
2. Schecter, E. We assess individual students in every course and give them grades. Why aren't course grades sufficient as program assessment? http://www.ncsu.edu/provost/academic_programs/uapr/FAQ/ UAPRFAQwhynotcoursegrades.html, 2003.
3. Arter, J. and McTighe, J. Scoring rubrics in the classroom: Using performance criteria for assessing and improving student performance. Thousand Oaks, CA, Corwin Press, Inc. 2001.
4. Blanchard, S.M. and Martin, P.J. Peer-reviewed literature - A resource for teaching mathematical modeling to undergraduates in biomedical engineering. Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, September, 2003.