Comparison of gene expression patterns in Longissimus dorsi of pigs between the high-parent heterosis cross combination LandracexLarge white and the mid-parent heterosis cross combination Large WhitexMeishan

Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

Volumn 17, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 1192-1196

  Liu, G Y ^a   Xiong, Y Z ^a   Deng, C Y ^a   Zuo, B ^a   Zhang, J H ^a  

^a HUAZHONG AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Correlation and Cluster Analyses; Differential Display; Gene Expression Patterns; Heterosis; Maternal Effect; Paternal Effect

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; EUKARYOTA; PIERIS BRASSICAE; SUS SCROFA;

EID: 5444259953     PISSN: 10112367     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2004.1192     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Davenport, C. B. 1908. Degeneration, albinism and inbreeding. Science. 28:454-455.
2. East, E. M. 1908. Report of the Connecticut Agricultural Experimental Station for Years 1907-1908. 419-428.
3. Hua, J., Y. Xing, W. Wu, C. Xu, X. Sun, S. Yu, Q. Zhang. 2003. Single-locus heterotic effects and dominance by dominance interactions can adequately explain the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 100:2574-2579.
4. Liang, P. and A. B. Pardee. 1992. Differential display of eukaryotic messenger RNA by means of the polymerase chain reaction. Science 257:967-971.
5. Liang, P., L. Averboukh and A. B. Pardee. 1993. Distribution and cloning of eukaryotic mRNAs by means of differential display: refinements and optimization. Nucleic Acids Res. 21:3269-3275.
6. Linskens, M. H. 1995. Cataloging altered gene expression in young and senescent cells using enhanced differential display. Nuclei Acids Res. 23:3244-3251.
7. Lu, H., J. Romero-Severson and R. Bernardo. 2003. Genetic basis of heterosis explored by simple sequence repeat markers in a random-mated maize population. Theor. Appl. Genet. 107:494-502.
8. Pan, Peiwen. 2002. Isolation, characterization and mapping of differentially expressed EST from porcine skeletal in different breeds or developing stages. Ph.D. Thesis, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
9. Pan, P. W., S. H. Zhao, M. Yu, T. A. Xiong and K. Li. 2003. Identification of Differentially Expressed Genes in the Longissimus Dorsi Muscle Tissue between Duroc and Erhualian Pigs by mRNA Differential Display. Asian-Aust. J. Sci. Vol 16, No.7:1066-1070.
10. Shull, G. H. 1908. The composition of a field of maize. American Breeders' Association Report 4:296-301.
11. Wu, L. M., Z. F. Ni, Z. K. Wang, Z. Lin and Q. X. Sun. 2001. Relationship between differential expression patterns of multigene families and heterosis in a wheat diallel crosses. Yi Chuan Xue Bao. 28:256-266.
12. Xiao, J., J. Li, L. Yuan and S. D. Tanksley. 1995. Dominance as the major genetic basis of heterosis in rice. Proceedings of the Third International Rice Genetics Symposium, Manila (Philippines).
13. Xie, X. D., Z. F. Ni, F. R. Meng, L. M. Wu, Z. K. Wang and X. Sun. 2003. Relationship between differences of gene expression in early developing seeds of hybrid versus parents and heterosis in wheat. Yi Chuan Xue Bao. 30:260-266.
14. Yamazaki, M. and K. Saito. 2002. Differential display analysis of gene expression in plants. CMLS, Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 59:1246-1255.
15. Yu, S. B., J. X. Li, C. G. Xu, Y. F. Tan, Y. J. Gao, X. H. Li, Qifa Zhang and M. A. Saghai Maroof. 1997. Importance of epistasis as the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Genetics. 94: 9226-9231.