Local innovation system governance and performance: A comparative analysis of Oxfordshire, Stuttgart and Toulouse

International Journal of Technology Management

Volumn 28, Issue 3-6, 2004, Pages 534-559

  Simmie, James ^a   Siino, Corinne ^b   Zuliani, Jean Mark ^b   Jalabert, Guy ^b,c   Strambach, Simone ^d  

^a OXFORD BROOKES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

^c Research Laboratory CIRUS CIEU   (France)

^d Maison de la Recherche ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

Competitiveness; Governance; Innovation; Oxfordshire; Stuttgart; Toulouse

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMICS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT;

GOVERNANCE; INNOVATION SYSTEMS; MARKET-ORIENTED GRASSROOTS SYSTEM; URBAN ECONOMY;

PUBLIC POLICY;

EID: 5444259867     PISSN: 02675730     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1504/ijtm.2004.005308     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. (2000) 'A new economy? The changing role of innovation and information technology in growth', OECD, Paris: OECD.
2. (2002) 'European innovation scoreboard 2002: technical paper No. 3: EU regions', European Commission, Brussels: EU Enterprise Directorate-General.
3. Cooke, P. (1998) 'Introduction: origins of the concept' in H.-J. Braczyk, P. Cooke and M. Heidenreich (Eds.) Regional Innovation Systems: The Role of Governances in a Globalized World, London: UCL Press, pp.2-25.
4. Schumpeter, J.A. (1939) Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process, New York: McGraw-Hill.
5. Lundvall, B.-A. (Ed.) (1992) National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, London: Frances Pinter.
6. Kline, S.J. and Rosenberg, N. (1986) 'An overview of innovation', in R. Landau and N. Rosenberg (Eds.) The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth, Washington DC: National Academy Press, p.290.
7. Nelson, R. (Ed.) (1993) National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Freeman, C. (1994) 'Innovation and growth', in M. Dodgson and R. Rothwell (Eds.) The Handbook of Industrial Innovation, Cheltenham: Elgar, pp.78-93.
9. Metcalf, S., Coombs, R. and Georghiou, L. (2002) 'Developing technology policy - balancing supply-side with demand', Paper Presented to the Cambridge/MIT Seminar on Technology Policy, London, 191102.
10. Hilpert, U. (1992) 'Archipelago Europe - islands of innovation, synthesis report', Forecasting and Assessment in Science and Technology, Science, Technology and Social and Economic Cohesion in the Community, Brussels: Commission of the European Communities, Vol. 18, Prospective Dossier No. 1.
11. Simmie, J.M. (2001) Innovative Cities, London: Spon.
12. Huggins, R. (2001) Global Index of Regional Know1ledge Economies: Benchmarking South East England, Guildford: South East England Development Agency.
13. (2002) 'Science and technology in the functional urban regions in Northwest Europe', Institut d'Amanegement et d 'Urbaisme de la Region Ile-de-France (IAURIF), Paris: IAURIF.
14. (2001) 'Research and development in Oxfordshire', FPD Savills, Oxford: FPD Savills.
15. Leary, M.E. (1986) 'High technology in Oxford and Cambridge', Working Paper No. 89, Oxford: Oxford Polytechnic Department of Town Planning.
16. Lawton-Smith, H. and Garnsey, E. (1998) 'Proximity and complexity in the emergence of high technology industry: the Oxbridge comparison', Geoforum, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp.433-450.
17. Porter, M.E. (1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations, London: Macmillan.
18. Porter, M.E. (2000) 'Location, competition and economic development: local clusters in a global economy', Economic Development Quarterly, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp.15-34.