Cooperative fluorescence effects for dipole-dipole interacting systems with experimentally relevant level configurations

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 68, Issue 4 B, 2003, Pages

  Hannstein, Volker ^a   Hegerfeldt, Gerhard C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BARIUM; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; ELECTRON ENERGY LEVELS; ELECTRON TRANSITIONS; FLUORESCENCE; HAMILTONIANS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MERCURY (METAL); PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; POSITIVE IONS; QUANTUM THEORY;

BLOCH EQUATIONS; DIPOLE-DIPOLE INTERACTING SYSTEMS; QUANTUM JUMP APPROACH;

ATOMIC PHYSICS;

EID: 5444259110     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. For references cf., e.g., those in Ref. [2].
2. S. Addicks, A. Beige, M. Dakna, and G.C. Hegerfeldt, Eur. Phys. J. D 15, 393 (2001).
3. T. Sauter, R. Blatt, W. Neuhauser, and P.E. Toschek, Opt. Commun. 60, 287 (1987).
4. T. Sauter, Ph. D. thesis, Universität Hamburg, 1987 (unpublished).
5. B.H.W. Hendriks and G. Nienhus, J. Mod. Opt. 35, 1331 (1988).
6. M. Lewenstein and J. Javanainen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1289 (1987).
7. M. Lewenstein and J. Javanainen, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 43, 1403 (1988).
8. G.S. Agarwal, S.V. Lawande, and R.D. D'Souza, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 24, 1413 (1988).
9. S.V. Lawande, Q.V. Lawande, and B.N. Jagatap, Phys. Rev. A 40, 3434 (1989).
10. C.R. Fu and C.D. Gong, Phys. Rev. A 45, 5095 (1992).
11. R.C. Thompson, D.J. Bates, K. Dholakia, D.M. Segal, and D.C. Wilson, Phys. Scr. 46, 285 (1992).
12. D.J. Berkeland, D.A. Raymondson, and V.M. Tassin, e-print physics/0304013.
13. W.M. Itano, J.C. Bergquist, and D.J. Wineland, Phys. Rev. A 38, 559 (1988).
14. M. Block, O. Rehm, P. Seibert, and G. Werth, Eur. Phys. J. D 7, 461 (1999).
15. C.J.S. Donald, D.M. Lucas, P.A. Barton, M.J. McDonnell, J.P. Stacey, D.A. Stevens, D.N. Stacey, and A.M. Steane, Europhys. Lett. 51, 388 (2000).
16. For references cf., e.g., Ref. [17].
17. A. Beige and G.C. Hegerfeldt, Phys. Rev. A 59, 2385 (1999).
18. C. Skornia, J. von Zanthier, G.S. Agarwal, E. Werner, and H. Walther, Phys. Rev. A 64, 0536803 (2001).
19. T. Sauter, W. Neuhauser, R. Blatt, and P.E. Toschek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 1696 (1986).
20. C. Skornia, J. von Zanthier, G.S. Agarwal, E. Werner, and H. Walther, Europhys. Lett. 56, 665 (2001).
21. In Ref. [3] it is stated "We have also demonstrated, with the light of two or three ions in the trap observed, that simulaneous quantum jumps use to happen at a rate large exceeding random coincidence."
22. G.C. Hegerfeldt and T.S. Wilser, in Proceedings of the Second International Wigner Symposium, 1991, edited by H.D. Deobner, W. Scherer, and F. Schroeck (World Scientific Singapore, 1992), p. 104
23. G.C. Hegerfeldt, Phys. Rev. A 47, 449 (1993)
24. G.C. Hegerfeldt and D.G. Sondermann, Quantum Semiclassic. Opt. 8, 121 (1996)
25. for a review cf. M.B. Plenio and P.L. Knight, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 101 (1998)
26. G.C. Hegerfeldt and D.G. Sondermann, the quantum jump approach is essentially equivalent to the Monte Carlo wave-function approach of J. Dalibard, Y. Castin, and K. Mølmer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 580 (1992)
27. G.C. Hegerfelt and D.G. Sondermann, and to the quantum trajectories of H. Carmichael, An Open Systems Approach to Quantum Optics, Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. m18 (Springer, Berlin, 1993).
28. W.M. Itano, J.C. Berquist, R.G. Hulet, and D.J. Wineland, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2732 (1987).
29. G.C. Hegerfeldt, Phys. Rev. A 47, 449 (1993).
30. A. Beige, Ph.D. thesis, Universität Göttingen, 1997 (unpublished).
31. G.C. Hegerfeldt, and M.B. Plenio, Phys. Rev. A 47, 2186 (1993).
32. A. Beige and G.C. Hegerfeldt, Phys. Rev. A 58, 4133 (1998).