Effects of Student Team Learning in Undergraduate Auditing Courses

Journal of Education for Business

Volumn 72, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 197-200

  Kunkel, J Gregory ^a   Shafer, William E ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 5444258575     PISSN: 08832323     EISSN: 19403356     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08832323.1997.10116853     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. American Education Change Commission (AECC). 1990. Objectives of education for accountants: Position statement No. 1. Issues in Accounting Education,: 307–312. Fall
2. Arthur Andersen & Co., Arthur Young. Coopers & Lybrand. Deloitte Haskins & Sells. Ernst & Whinney, Peat Marwick Main & Co., Price Waterhouse, and Touche Ross. 1989. Perspectives on education: Capabilities for success in the accounting profession, New York: Author.
3. Cooper, J. L., Prescott, S., Cook, L., Smith, L., Mueck, R., and Cuseo, J., 1990. Cooperative learning and college instruction: Effective use of student learning teams, Long Beach, CA: Institute of Teaching and Learning.
4. Cottell, P. G., and Millis, B. J., 1993. Cooperative learning structures in the instruction of accounting. Issues in Accounting Education,: 40–59. Spring
5. Fiechtner, S. B., and Davis, E. A., 1992. “ Why some groups fail: A survey of students' experiences with learning groups ”. In Collaborative learning: A sourcebook for higher education, Edited by: Goodsell, A., Maher, M., and Tinto, V., 59–67. University Park, PA: National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning & Assessment.
6. Johnson, D. W., Maruyama, G., Johnson, R., Nelson, D., and Skon, L., 1981. Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 89: 47–62.
7. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., and Smith, K. A., 1991. Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity, Washington, DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development. (ASHEERIC Higher Education Report No. 4)
8. Neave, H. R., 1990. The Deming dimension, Knoxville, TN: SPC Press.
9. Parry, R. W., Jr. 1990. The impact of assigned study groups on study effort and examination performance. Issues in Accounting Education,: 222–239. Fall
10. Ravenscroft, S. P., Buckless, F. A., McCombs, G. B., and Zuckerman, G. J., 1995. Incentives in student team learning: An experiment in cooperative group learning. Issues in Accounting Education,: 97–108. Spring
11. Schwartz, M. D., 1992. Study sessions and higher grades: Questioning the causal link. College Student Journal, 26 (3): 292–299.
12. Slavin, R. E., 1987. Cooperative learning: Student teams (), 2nd ed., Washington, DC: National Education Association.
13. Slavin, R. E., 1988. Cooperative learning and student achievement. Educational Leadership, 45: 31–33.
14. Slavin, R. E., 1989. “ Cooperative learning and student achievement ”. In School and classroom organization, Edited by: Slavin, R. E., 129–156. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Slavin, R. E., 1990. Cooperative Learning, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
16. Slavin, R. E., 1992. “ Research on cooperative learning: Consensus and controversy ”. In Collaborative learning: A sourcebook for higher education, Edited by: Goodsell, A., Maher, M., and Tinto, V., 97–99. University Park, PA: National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, & Assessment.