Defining expertise in the use of constraint-based CAD tools by examining practicing professionals

ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 2763-2775

  Hartman, Nathan W ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY; DESIGN PROCESSES; KNOWLEDGE DOMAIN; SOLIDS MODELING;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; CURRICULA; DATA REDUCTION; GEOMETRY; GRAPHIC METHODS; PROBLEM SOLVING; TEACHING; VISUALIZATION;

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN;

EID: 5444249961     PISSN: 01901052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. rd Midyear Conference of the Engineering Design Graphics Division of the American Society for Engineering Education,. Columbus, Ohio, January 15-17, 1999.
2. rd Midyear Conference of the Engineering Design Graphics Division of the American Society for Engineering Education, Columbus, Ohio, January 15-17, 1999.
3. th Midyear Conference of the Engineering Design Graphics Division of the American Society for Engineering Education, San Francisco, California, January 6-9, 2002.
4. Greco, J. (2000, September). Thinking tools. Computer Graphics World, 23 (9). pp. 49 - 52.
5. Greco, J. (2001, November). Getting smart. Computer Graphics World, 24 (11). pp. 38-43.
6. Dean, A. (2000, November). Intelligent data translation: How close are we? http://www.cadserver.co.uk/common/viewer/archive/2000/Nov/1/feature4.phtm
7. st century: A proposed team effort. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 63(2), 4-12.
8. st century. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 63(2), 33-42.
9. th Midyear Conference of the Engineering Design Graphics Division of the American Society for Engineering Education, Biloxi, Mississippi, November 6-9, 1999.
10. th Midyear Conference of the Engineering Design Graphics Division of the American Society for Engineering Education, Tempe, Arizona, 1990.
11. Cumberland, R. R. (2001). The foundation of a progressive engineering graphics curriculum: A directed project report. Unpublished masters thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette.
12. th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice-Hall.
13. Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14. Keller, C.M. & Keller, J.D. (1996). Cognition and tools use: The blacksmith at work Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15. Ericsson, K.A. & Smith, J. (1991). Prospects and limits of the empirical study of expertise: An introduction. In K.A. Ericsson & J. Smith (Ed.) Toward a general theory of expertise (p. 1-38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Chi, M.T.H., Glaser, R. & Farr, M.J. (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Feltovich, P.J., Ford, K.M., & Hoffman, R.R. (1997). Introduction. In P.J. Feltovich, K.M. Ford, & R.R.Hoffman (Eds.) Expertise in context: Human and machine (p. xiii-xviii). Cambridge, MA: AAAI Press/The MIT Press.
18. Glaser, R. & Chi, M.T.H. (1988). Introduction. In M.T.H. Chi, R. Glaser, & M.J. Farr (Eds.) The Nature of Expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Mieg, H.A. (2001). The social psychology of expertise: Case studies in research, professional domains, and expert roles. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum and Associates.
20. Bhavnani, S.K. & John, B.E. (1996). Exploring the unrealized potential of computer-aided drafting. Proceedings of CHI '96, 332-339.
21. Bhavnani, S.K. & John, B.E. (1997). From sufficient to efficient usage: An analysis of strategic knowledge. Proceedings of CHI '97, 91-98.
22. Bhavnani, S.K. & John, B.E. (1998). Delegation and circumvention: Two faces of efficiency. Proceedings of CHI '98, 273-280.
23. Bhavnani, S.K., John, B.E., & Flemming, U. (1999). The strategic use of CAD: An empirically inspired, theory-based course. Proceedings of CHI '99, 183-190.
24. McGraw, K.L. & Harbison-Briggs, K. (1989). Knowledge acquisition: Principles and guidelines. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
25. th ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.
26. Olson, J. R. & Biolsi, K.J. (1991). Techniques for representing expert knowledge. In K.A. Ericsson & J. Smith (Ed.) Toward a general theory of expertise (p. 240-285). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Hoffman, R.R., Shadbolt, N. R., Burton, A.M., & Klein, G. (1995). Eliciting knowledge from experts: A methodological analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62(2), 129-158.
28. Polkinghorne, D.E. (1989). Phenomenological research methods. In R.S. Valle & S. Halling (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological perspectives in psychology (pp. 41-60). New York: Plenum.
29. Meyer, M.A. & Booker, J.M. (1991). Eliciting and analyzing expert judgment: A practical guide (Volume 5). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
30. Vincenti, W.G. (1990). What engineers know and how they know it: Analytical studies from aeronautical history. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.