Progress of ESO's 100-m OWL optical telescope design

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

Volumn 5382, Issue PART 1, 2004, Pages 159-168

  Brunette, E ^a   Dierickx, P ^a   Gilmozzi, R ^a   Le Louarn, M ^a   Koch, F ^a   Noethe, L ^a   Verinaud Ch ^a   Yaitskova, N ^a  

^a EUROPEAN SOUTHERN OBSERVATORY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE OPTICS; ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS; FABRICATION; MICROELECTROMECHANICAL DEVICES; OPTICAL DESIGN; OPTOELECTRONIC DEVICES; SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO; VISION;

ACTIVE OPTICS; NON-ADAPTIVE TELESCOPES; STARS;

OPTICAL TELESCOPES;

EID: 5444247284     PISSN: 0277786X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.566200     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. R. Gilmozzi, B. Delabre, P. Dierickx, N. Hubin, F. Koch, G. Monnet, M. Quattri, F. Rigaut, R.N. Wilson, The Future of Filled Aperture Telescopes: is a 100m Feasible?; 1998, Advanced Technology Optical/IR Telescopes VI, SPIE 3352, 778
2. A. B. Meinel, An overview of the Technological Possibilities of Future Telescopes, 1978, ESO Conf. Proc. 23, 13.
3. L. D. Barr, Factors Influencing Selection of a Next Generation Telescope Concept, 1979, Proc. SPIE Vol. 172, 8.
4. A. Ardeberg, T. Andersen, B. Lindberg, M. Owner-Petersen, T. Korhonen, P. Sendergård, Breaking the 8m Barrier -One Approach for a 25m Class Optical Telescope, ESO Conf. And Workshop Proc. No42, pp. 75-78, 1992.
5. M. Mountain, What is beyond the current generation of ground-based 8-m to 10-m class telescopes and the VLT-I?, SPIE 2871, pp. 597-606, 1996.
6. P. Dierickx, B. Delabre, L. Noethe, OWL optical design, active optics and error budget; Proc-SPIE, 4003, 2000.
7. P. Dierickx, J. Beletic, B. Delabre, M. Ferrari, R. Gilmozzi, N. Hubin, The Optics of the OWL 100-M Adaptive Telescope; 2000, Proceedings Bäckaskog Workshop on Extremely Large Telescopes, p97.
8. P. Dierickx, Optical design and adaptive optics properties of the OWL I00-m telescope; Proc. ESO Conf. Beyond Conventional Adaptive Optics, Venice, 2001, http://lenin.pd-astro.it/venice2001/proceedings/.
9. G.Chanan, M.troy, C.Ohara, "Phasing the primary mirror segments of the Keck telescopes: a comparison of different techniques", Proc.SPIE, 4003, 188-201,2000.
10. A. Schumacher, L. Montoya, N. Devaney, K. Dohlen, P. Dierickx, Phasing ELTs for Adaptive Optics: preliminary results of a comparison of techniques, Proc. ESO Conf. Beyond Conventional Adaptive Optics, Venice, 2001 http://lenin.pdastro.it/venice2001/proceedings/.
11. E. Marchetti, N. Hubin, E. Fedrigo, J. Brynnel, B. Delabre, R. Donaldson, F. Franza, R. Conan, M. Le Louarn, C. Cavadore, A. Balestra, D. Baade, J. L. Lizon, R. Gilmozzi, G. Monnet, R. Ragazzoni, C. Arcidiacono, A. Baruffolo, E. Diolaiti, J. Farinato, E. Viard, D. Butler, S. Hippler, A. Amorim; MAD the ESO multi-conjugate adaptive optics demonstrator; 2002, Proc SPIE conf. Adaptive Optical System Technologies II.