Modeling the complexity of different, recently deglaciated soil landscapes as a function of map scale

Geoderma

Volumn 123, Issue 1-2, 2004, Pages 115-130

  Hupy, Christina M ^a   Schaetzl, Randall J ^a   Messina, Joseph P ^a   Hupy, Joseph P ^a   Delamater, Paul ^a   Enander, Helen ^b   Hughey, Brandi D ^a   Boehm, Rebecca ^b   Mitroka, Matthew J ^a   Fashoway, Michael T ^b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b 530 W Allegan St 48933   (United States)

Author keywords

GIS; Map scale; Soil landscape analysis; Soil mapping

Indexed keywords

DRAINAGE; GLACIAL GEOLOGY; LANDFORMS; MAPPING;

DEGLACIATION; SOIL LANDSCAPES; SOIL PATTERNS;

SOIL MECHANICS;

DEGLACIATION; GIS; MAPPING; MODELING; SCALE EFFECT;

EID: 5444244963     PISSN: 00167061     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.01.030     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Abel P.L., Gulsvig A., Johnson D.L., Seaholm J. Soil Survey of Stutsman County, North Dakota. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. 1995;US Govt. Printing Office, Washington, DC
2. Amundson R., Guo Y., Gong P. Soil diversity and land use in the United States. Ecosystems. 6:2003;470-482
3. Atkinson P.M., Tate N.J. Spatial scale problems and geostatistical solutions: a review. Prof. Geogr. 52:2000;607-623
4. Barrett L.R., Schaetzl R.J. Soil development and spatial variability on geomorphic surfaces of different age. Phys. Geogr. 14:1993;39-55
5. Bie S.W., Beckett P.H.T. Quality control in the soil survey: II. The costs of the survey. J. Soil Sci. 22:1971;453-465
6. Brubaker S.C., Hallmark C.T. A comparison of statistical methods for evaluating map unit composition. Mausbach M.J., Wilding L.P. Spatial Variabilities of Soils and Landforms. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Spec. Publ. vol. 28:1991;73-88 American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI
7. Campbell J.B. Spatial variability of soils. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 69:1979;544-556
8. Carre F., Girard M.C. Quantitative mapping of soil types based on regression kriging of taxonomic distances with landform and land cover attributes. Geoderma. 110:2002;241-263
9. Clayton L. Stagnant-glacier features of the Missouri Coteau in North Dakota. Clayton L., Freers T.F. Glacial Geology of the Missouri Coteau. Miscellaneous Series-North Dakota Geological Survey. vol. 30:1967;25-46
10. Clayton L., Moran S.R. Chronology of late Wisconsin glaciation in middle North America. Quat. Sci. Rev. 1:1982;55-82
11. Clayton L., Attig J.W., Mickelson D.M. Effects of late Pleistocene permafrost on the landscape of Wisconsin, USA. Boreas. 30:2001;173188
12. Crow E.L., Davis F.A., Maxfield M.W. Statistics Manual. 1960;Dover Publications, Toronto
13. Fridland V.M. Makeup of the soil cover. Sov. Soil Sci. 4:1965;343-354
14. Fridland V.M. Structure of the soil mantle. Geoderma. 12:1974;35-41
15. Gessler P.E., Moore I.D., McKenzie N.J., Ryan P.J. Soil-landscape modelling and spatial prediction of soil attributes. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Syst. 9:1995;421-432
16. Haberman G.M., Hole F.D. Soilscape analysis in terms of pedogeomorphic fabric: an exploratory study. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44:1980;336-340
17. Hennings V. Accuracy of coarse-scale land quality maps as a function of the upscaling procedure used for soil data. Geoderma. 107:2002;177-196
18. Hole F.D. Suggested terminology for describing soils as three-dimensional bodies. Proc.-Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 17:1953;131-135
19. Hole F.D. An approach to landscape analysis with emphasis on soils. Geoderma. 21:1978;1-13
20. Hole F.D. Soilscape analysis in terms of pedogeomorphic fabric: an exploratory study. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44:1980;336-340
21. Hole F.D., Campbell J.B. Soil Landscape Analysis. 1985;Rowman and Allanheld, Totowa, NJ. 196 pp.
22. Hunckler R.V., Schaetzl R.J. Spodosol development as affected by geomorphic aspect, Baraga County, Michigan. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 61:1997;1105-1115
23. Ibanez J.J., De-Alba S., Bermúdez F.F., García- Álvarez A. Pedodiversity: concepts and measures. Catena. 24:1995;215-232
24. Ibanez J.J., De-Alba S., Lobo S., Zucarello A. Pedodiversity and global soil patterns at coarse scales. Geoderma. 83:1998;171-192
25. Ishida T., Itagaki S., Sasaki Y., Ando H. Drainage network analysis for regional partitions of alluvial paddy-field soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 67:2003;190-197
26. Jenny H. Factors of Soil Formation. 1941;McGraw-Hill, New York
27. Johnson W.H. Ice-wedge casts and relict patterned ground in central Illinois and their environmental significance. Quat. Res. 33:1990;51-72
28. Johnson D.L., Watson-Stegner D. Evolution model of pedogenesis. Soil Sci. 143:1987;349-366
29. Kabrick J.M., Clayton M.K., McSweeney K. Spatial patterns of carbon and texture on drumlins in northeastern Wisconsin. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 61:1997;541-548
30. Lark R.M., Beckett P.H.T. A regular pattern in the relative areas of soil profile classes and possible applications in reconnaissance soil survey. Geoderma. 68:1995;27-37
31. Levin S.A. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology. 73:1992;1943-1967
32. Lyford W.H. Narrow soils and intricate soil patterns in southern New England. Geoderma. 11:1974;195-208
33. McBratney A.B., Odeh I.O.A., Bishop T.F.A., Dunbar M.S., Shatar T.M. An overview of pedometric techniques for use in soil survey. Geoderma. 97:2000;293-327
34. McMaster R.B. The geometric-properties of numerical generalization. Geogr. Anal. 19:1987;330-346
35. Meentemeyer V. Geographical perspectives of space, time, and scale. Landsc. Ecol. 3:1989;163-173
36. Meentemeyer V., Box E. Scale effects in landscape studies. Turner M.G. Landscape Heterogeneity and Disturbance. 1987;15-34 Springer-Verlag, New York
37. Mickelson D.M., Clayton L., Fullerton D.S., Borns H.W. The Late Wisconsin glacial record of the Laurentide Ice Sheet in the United States. Wright H.E. Jr. Late-Quaternary Environments of the United States. The Late Pleistocene. vol. 1:1983;3-37 University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
38. Muller J.C. The removal of spatial conflicts in line generalization. Cartogr. Geogr. Inf. Syst. 17:1990;141-149
39. Pavlik H.F., Hole F.D. Soilscape analysis of slightly contrasting terrains in southeastern Wisconsin. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 41:1977;407-413
40. Penning-Rowsell E., Townshend J.R.G. The influence of scale on the factors affecting stream channel slope. Trans.-IBG NS. 3:1978;395-415
41. Phillips J.D. An evaluation of the state factor model of soil ecosystems. Ecol. Model. 45:1989;165-177
42. Phillips J.D. Chaotic evolution of some coastal plain soils. Phys. Geogr. 14:1993;566-580
43. Phillips J.D. Progressive and regressive pedogenesis and complex soil evolution. Quat. Res. 40:1993;169-176
44. Phillips J.D. Stability implications of the state factor model of soils as a nonlinear dynamical system. Geoderma. 58:1993;1-15
45. Phillips J.D. Divergent evolution and the spatial structure of soil landscape variability. Catena. 43:2001;101-113
46. Qi Y., Wu J.G. Effects of changing spatial resolution on the results of landscape pattern analysis using spatial autocorrelation indices. Landsc. Ecol. 11:1996;39-49
47. SAS SAS/INSIGHT User's Guide, Version 8. 1999;752 SAS Institute, Cary, NC
48. Schaetzl R.J. Soilscape analysis of contrasting glacial terrains in Wisconsin. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 76:1986;414-425
49. Schaetzl R.J. Lithologic discontinuities in some soils on drumlins: theory, detection, and application. Soil Sci. 163:1998;570-590
50. Schaetzl R.J., Burns S.F., Small T.W., Johnson D.L. Tree uprooting: review of types and patterns of soil disturbance. Phys. Geogr. 11:1990;277-291
51. Sinowski W., Auerswald K. Using relief parameters in a discriminant analysis to stratify geological areas with different spatial variability of soil properties. Geoderma. 89:1999;113-128
52. Stoms D.M. Scale dependence of species richness maps. Prof. Geogr. 46:1994;346-358
53. Stone E.L. Windthrow influences on spatial heterogeneity in a forest soil. Mitt.-Eidgenöss. Anst. forstl. Vers.Wes. 51:1975;77-87
54. Turner M.G., O'Neill R.V., Gardner R.H., Milne B.T. Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern. Landsc. Ecol. 3:1989;153-162
55. Webster R. The development of pedometrics. Geoderma. 62:1994;1-15
56. Werlein J.O. Soil Survey of Crawford County, Michigan. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. 1998;US Govt. Printing Office, Washington, DC
57. Wilding L.P., Jones R.B., Schafer G.W. Variation in soil morphological properties within Miami, Celina, and Crosby mapping units in west-central Ohio. Proc.-Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 29:1965;711-717
58. Willis K.J., Whittaker R.J. Species diversity - scale matters. Science. 295:2002;1245-1248