No genetic evidence for hybridization between Rio Grande sucker, Catostomus plebeius, and the introduced white sucker, Catostomus Commersoni, in the Rio Grande

Environmental Biology of Fishes

Volumn 71, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 85-93

  McPhee, Megan V ^a   Turner, Thomas F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

Catostomidae; Displacement; hybrid; non native; species

Indexed keywords

CYPRINID; GENETIC ANALYSIS; HYBRIDIZATION; INTRODUCED SPECIES; NATIVE SPECIES;

NEW MEXICO; NORTH AMERICA; RIO GRANDE; UNITED STATES;

CATOSTOMIDAE; CATOSTOMUS; CATOSTOMUS COMMERSONI; CATOSTOMUS PLEBEIUS; CYPRINIDAE; TRANSPOSONS;

EID: 5444237116     PISSN: 03781909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:EBFI.0000043179.44431.d4     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Anderson, E. 1948. Hybridization of the habitat. Evolution 2: 1-9.
2. Arévalo, E., S.K. Davis & J.W. Sites, Jr. 1994. Mitochondrial DNA sequence divergence and phylogenetic relationships among eight chromosome races of the Sceloporus grammicus complex (Phrynosomatidae) in central Mexico. Syst. Biol. 43: 387-418.
3. Avise, J.C. 1994. Molecular markers, natural history and evolution. Chapman and Hall, New York. 511 p.
4. Bielawski, J.P. & J.R. Gold. 1987. Uneven synonymous substitution rates within and between two protein-coding mitochondrial genes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13: 889-892.
5. Boecklen, W.J. & D.J. Howard. 1997. Genetic analysis of hybrid zones: Number of markers and power of resolution. Ecology 78: 2611-2616.
6. Buth, D.G., R.W. Murphy & L. Ulmer. 1987. Population differentiation and introgressive hybridization of the flannel-mouth sucker and of hatchery and native stocks of the razorback sucker. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 116: 103-110.
7. Calamusso, B., J.N. Rinne & P.R. Turner. 2002. Distribution and abundance of the Rio Grande sucker in the Carson and Santa Fe National Forests, New Mexico. Southwestern Nat. 47: 182-186.
8. Campton, D.E. 1987. Natural hybridization and introgression in fishes: methods of detection and genetic interpretation. pp. 161-192. In: N. Ryman & F. Utter (ed.), Population Genetics and Fishery Management. University of Washington Press, Seattle.
9. Corbett, B.W. & P.M. Powles. 1986. Spawning and larval drift of sympatric walleyes and white suckers in an Ontario stream. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 115: 41-46.
10. Curry, K.D. & A. Spacie. 1984. Differential use of stream habitat by spawning catostomids. Am. Midland Nat. 111: 267-279.
11. Dobzhansky, T. 1940. Speciation as a stage in evolutionary divergence. Am. Nat. 74: 312-321.
12. Dowling, T.E., W.L. Minckley & P.C. Marsh. 1996. Mitochondrial DNA diversity within and among populations of razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus) as determined by restriction endonuclease analysis. Copeia 1996: 542-550.
13. Epifanio, J. & D. Philipp. 2001. Simulating the extinction of parental lineages from introgressive hybridization: the effects of fitness, initial proportions of parental taxa, and mate choice. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 10: 339-354.
14. Hubbs, C.L. 1955. Hybridization between fish species in nature. Syst. Zool. 4: 1-20.
15. Hubbs, C.L. & R.R. Miller. 1953. Hybridization in nature between the fish genera Catostomus and Xyrauchen. Papers Michigan Acad. Sci., Arts, Lett. 38: 207-233.
16. Kwak, T.J. & T.M. Skelly. 1992. Spawning habitat, behavior, and morphology as isolating mechanisms of the golden redhorse, Moxostoma erythrurum, and the black redhorse, M. duquesnei, two syntopic fishes. Environ. Biol. Fish. 34: 127-137.
17. Leary, R.F., F.W. Allendorf & K.L. Knudsen. 1983. Consistently high meristic counts in natural hybrids between brook trout and bull trout. Syst. Zool. 32: 369-376.
18. Leary, R.F., F.W. Allendorf & S.H. Forbes. 1993. Conservation genetics of bull trout in the Columbia and Klamath river drainages. Conserv. Biol. 7: 856-865.
19. Miller, R.R., J.D. Williams & J.E. Williams. 1989. Extinctions of North American fishes during the past century. Fisheries 14: 22-38.
20. Rhymer, J.M. & D. Simberloff. 1996. Extinction by hybridization and introgression. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27: 83-109.
21. Rinne, J.N. 1995. Reproductive biology of the Rio Grande sucker, Catostomus plebeius (Cypriniformes), in a montane stream, New Mexico. Southwestern Nat. 40: 237-241.
22. Scribner, K.T., K.S. Page & M.L. Barton. 2001. Hybridization in freshwater fishes: a review of case studies and cytonuclear methods of biological inference. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 10: 293-323.
23. Smith, G.R. 1966. Distribution and evolution of the North American catostomid fishes of the subgenus Pantosteus, genus Catostomus. Misc. Pub., Univ. Michigan Mus. Zool. 129: 1-133.
24. Smith, G.R. 1992a. Phylogeny and biogeography of the Catostomidae, freshwater fishes of North America and Asia. pp. 778-826. In: R.L. Mayden (ed.), Systematics, Historical Ecology, and North American Freshwater Fishes, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
25. Smith, G.R. 1992b. Introgression in fishes: significance for paleontology, cladistics, and evolutionary rates. Syst. Biol. 41: 41-57.
26. Swift-Miller, S.M., B.M. Johnson & R.T. Muth. 1999. Factors affecting the diet and abundance of northern populations of Rio Grande sucker (Catostomus plebeius). Southwestern Nat. 44: 148-156.
27. Swofford, D.L. 2001. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4.1. Sinauer Associations, Sunderland.