Feasibility of a patient decision aid regarding disclosure of personal health information: Qualitative evaluation of the Health Care Information Directive

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Volumn 4, Issue , 2004, Pages

  Tracy, C Shawn ^a   Dantas, Guilherme Coelho ^a   Upshur, Ross E G ^a,b,c  

^a SUNNYBROOK RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANADA; CONSUMER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; LANGUAGE; MALE; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PROTECTION; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; TECHNIQUE; URBAN POPULATION; ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COMPUTER SECURITY; CONFIDENTIALITY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; EVALUATION STUDY; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; TRUST;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ADULT; AGED; COMPUTER SECURITY; CONFIDENTIALITY; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; DISCLOSURE; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ONTARIO; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; TRUST; URBAN POPULATION;

EID: 5444233582     PISSN: 14726947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-4-13     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Hodge JG Jr, Gostin LO, Jacobson PD: Legal issues concerning electronic health information: privacy, quality, and liability. JAMA 1999, 282:1466-1471.
2. Chiang YC, Hsu TS, Kuo S, Liau CJ, Wang DW: Preserving confidentiality when sharing medical database with the Cellsecu system. Int J Med Inf 2003, 71:17-23.
3. Kirshen AJ, Ho C: Ethical considerations in sharing personal information on computer data sets. Can Fam Physician 1999, 45:2563-2565. 2575-2567
4. Gostin LO: National health information privacy: regulations under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. JAMA 2001, 285:3015-3021.
5. Korn D: Medical information privacy and the conduct of biomedical research. Acad Med 2000, 75:963-968.
6. Willison DJ: Health services research and personal health information: privacy concerns, new legislation and beyond. CMAJ 1998, 159:1378-1380.
7. Goel V, Williams J, Anderson G, Backstein-Hirssch P, Fooks C, Naylor C, eds: Patterns of Health Care in Ontario: The ICES Practice Atlas (2nd edition). Ottawa: Canadian Medical Association 1996.
8. Canadian Medical Association: Health information privacy code. CMAJ 1998, 159:997-1006.
9. Saskatchewan Health: Consultation Paper on Protection of Personal Health Information. Regina: Government of Saskatchewan, Ministry of Health 1998 [http://www.health.gov.sk.ca/ph_br_health_leg_phiq/response/intro.htm]. (accessed 23 June 2004)
10. Consumers' Association of Canada: Privacy and Health Information. Ottawa: Consumers' Association of Canada 2002.
11. Yawn B, Yawn R, Geier G, Xia Z, Jacobsen S: The impact of requiring patient authorization for use of data in medical records research. J Fam Pract 1998, 47:361-365.
12. Robling MR, Hood K, Houston H, Pill R, Fay J, Evans HM: Public attitudes towards the use of primary care patient record data in medical research without consent: a qualitative study. J Med Ethics 2004, 30:104-109.
13. Gostin LO, Hadley J: Health services research: public benefits, personal privacy, and proprietary interests. Ann Intern Med 1998, 129:833-835.
14. Woolf SH, Rothemich SF, Johnson RE, Marsland DW: Selection bias from requiring patients to give consent to examine data for health services research. Arch Fam Med 2000, 9:1111-1118.
15. Jacobsen SJ, Xia Z, Campion ME, Darby CH, Plevak MF, Seltman KD, Melton LJ 3rd: Potential effect of authorization bias on medical record research. Mayo Clin Proc 1999, 74:330-338.
16. Chalmers J, Muir R: Patient privacy and confidentiality. BMJ 2003, 326:725-726.
17. Kmietowicz Z: Confusion reigns as data law continues to threaten research. The Scientist 2001 [https://www.biomedcentral.com/news/20010516/03]. (accessed 23 June 2004)
18. Upshur RE, Morin B, Goel V: The privacy paradox: laying Orwell's ghost to rest. CMAJ 2001, 165:307-309.
19. Mandl KD, Szolovits P, Kohane IS: Public standards and patients' control: how to keep electronic medical records accessible but private. BMJ 2001, 322:283-287.
20. Upshur RE, Goel V: The health care information directive. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2001, 1:1.
21. Ovretveit J: Evaluating Health Interventions. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press; 1998.
22. Willison D, Keshavjee K, Nair K, Goldsmith C, Holbrook A: Patient consent preferences for research uses of information in electronic medical records: interview and survey data. BMJ 2003, 326:1-5.
23. The Caldicott Committee, Department of Health: Report on the Review of Patient-identifiable Information. London: National Health Service 1997 [http://www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/06/84/04/04068404.pdf]. (accessed 23 June 2004)
24. Schoenberg R, Safran C: Internet based repository of medical records that retains patient confidentiality. BMJ 2000, 321:1199-1203.
25. Pyper C, Amery J, Watson M, Crook C: Patients' experiences when accessing their on-line electronic patient records in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2004, 54:38-43.
26. MacDonald R: Commentary: a patient's viewpoint. BMJ 2001, 322:287.