What is local about local environmental governance? Observations from the local biodiversity action planning process

Area

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 270-279

  Evans, James ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Biodiversity action planning; Local environmental governance; Path dependency; UK

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; LOCAL PLANNING; PLANNING PROCESS;

BIRMINGHAM [BIRMINGHAM (MTD)]; BIRMINGHAM [ENGLAND]; ENGLAND; EURASIA; EUROPE; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 5444221177     PISSN: 00040894     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0004-0894.2004.00224.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Barker G 2000 Ecological recombination in urban areas: implications for nature conservation Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Monkswood
2. Bryson J, McGuinness M and Ford R 2002 Chasing a 'loose and baggy monster': almshouses and the geography of charity Area 34 48-58
3. Cowell R 1997 Stretching the limits: environmental compensation, habitat creation and sustainable development Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 22 292-306
4. DoE 1994 Biodiversity: The U.K. action plan Her Majesty's Stationary Office, London
5. Giddens A 1991 Modernity and self-identity: self and society in the late modern age Polity Press, Cambridge
6. Goodwin P 1998 'Hired hands' or 'local voice': understandings and experience of local participation in conservation Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 23 481-99
7. Grabher G and Stark D 1997 Organizing diversity: evolutionary theory, network analysis and post-socialism in Grabher G and Stark D eds Restructuring networks in postsocialism: legacies, linkages, localities Oxford University Press, Oxford 1-32
8. Harrison C and Davies G 2002 Conserving biodiversity that matters: practitioners' perspectives on brownfield development and urban nature conservation in London journal of Environmental Management 65 95-108
9. Healey P 1992 Planning through debate: the communicative turn in planning theory Town Planning Review 63 143-62
10. Hillier J 1999 Going round the back? Complex networks and informal action in local planning processes Environment and Planning A 32 33-54
11. Jackson D 2000 Guidance on the interpretation ofthe biodiversity broad habitat classification (terrestrial and freshwater types): definitions and the relationship with other habitat classifications JNCC, Peterborough
12. Jessop B 1991 Thatcherism: the British road to post-Fordism in Jessup B, Kastendiek H, Nielson K and Pederson O eds The politics of flexibility Edward Elgar, Aldershot 83-101
13. Kendall J and Knapp M 1995 A loose and baggy monster: boundaries, definitions and typologies in Smith J, Rochester C and Hedley R eds An introduction to the voluntary sector Routledge, London 66-95
14. Massey D 1984 Spatial divisions of labour: social structures and the geography of production Macmillan, London
15. Muir K, Phillips M and Healey M 2000 Shades of green in local authority policy making: a regional case study Area 32 369-82
16. Selman P and Wragg A 1999 Local sustainability planning: from interest-driven networks to vision-driven supernetworks Planning Practice and Research 14 329-40
17. UKBG 1995 Biodiversity: The U.K. Steering Group report. Volume 1: meeting the Rio challenge UK Biodiversity Steering Group, London
18. UKLIAG 1997a Guidance for local biodiversity action plans: an introduction UK Local Issues Advisory Group, London
19. UKLIAG 1997b Guidance for local biodiversity action plans: developing partnerships UK Local Issues Advisory Group, London
20. UKLIAG 1997c Guidance for local biodiversity action plans: evaluating priorities and setting targets for habitats and species UK Local Issues Advisory Group, London
21. UKLIAG 1997d Guidance for local biodiversity action plans: how local biodiversity action plans relate to other plans UK Local Issues Advisory Group, London
22. While A, Jonas A and Gibbs D 2003 Who opposes and why (and where)? Tracing the roots of local environmental action in England Paper delivered in 'Opposition attracts: why and how communities oppose locally unwanted land uses' session at the RGS-IBG Annual Conference, London
23. Wilks S and Hall P 1994 Off the agenda? Town and Country Planning 20 217
24. Wolch J 1990 The shadow state: government and voluntary sector in transition The Foundation Centre, New York
25. WT 2002 The Wildlife Trusts (http://www.wildlifetrusts.org/) Accessed 14 January 2002
26. Wynne B 1996 May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide in Lash S, Szerszynski B and Wynne B eds Risk, environment and modernity Sage, London 44-83