Modelling hydrological processess in mesoscale lowland river basins with SWAT - Capabilities and challenges

Hydrological Sciences Journal

Volumn 53, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 989-1000

  Schmalz, Britta ^a   Tavares, Filipa ^a   Fohrer, Nicola ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Ecohydrological model; Groundwater surface water interactions; Lowland hydrology; Mesoscale river catchments; SWAT

Indexed keywords

CULTIVATION; EARTH SCIENCES; GROUNDWATER; HYDROGEOLOGY; RIVERS; RUNOFF; UNDERGROUND RESERVOIRS; WATER; WATER ANALYSIS; WATERSHEDS; WETLANDS;

ECOHYDROLOGICAL MODEL; GROUNDWATER-SURFACE WATER INTERACTIONS; LOWLAND HYDROLOGY; MESOSCALE RIVER CATCHMENTS; SWAT;

CATCHMENTS;

BASIN ANALYSIS; CATCHMENT; CONFERENCE PROCEEDING; DRAINAGE BASIN; ECOHYDROLOGY; GROUNDWATER-SURFACE WATER INTERACTION; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; RIVER BASIN; RIVER DISCHARGE; WATER BUDGET; WATER RETENTION;

CENTRAL EUROPE; EURASIA; EUROPE; GERMANY; KIELSTAU BASIN; SCHLESWIG-HOLSTEIN; TREENE BASIN;

EID: 54349115965     PISSN: 02626667     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1623/hysj.53.5.989     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Arnold, J. G. & Allen, P. M. (1999) Automated methods for estimating baseflow and ground water recharge from streamflow records. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 35(2), 411-424. Baseflow separation programme: http://www.brc.tamus.edu/swat/softfbaseflow.html.
2. Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R. S. & Williams, J. R. (1998) Large area hydrologic modelling and assessment, Part I.: Model development. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 34(1), 73-89.
3. BGR (1999) Bodenübersichtskarte im Maßstab 1:200 000 (BÜK 200). Verbreitung der Bodengeseltschaften, Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften and Rohstoffe, Hannover, Germany.
4. Dey, T. (2004) Räumlich differenzierte Einzugsgebietsmodellierung für den tidefreien Bereich der Treene. Diploma Thesis, Ecology Centre, Kiel University, Germany. http://www.hydrology.uni-kiel.de/ lehre/abschlussarbeiten/datdey.pdf.
5. Dey, T., Horn, A., Hörmann, G. & Fohrer, F. (2004) Räumlich differenzierte Einzugsgebietsmodellierung am Beispiel des tidefreien Bereichs der Treene. In: Neue Methodische Ansätze zur Modellierung der Wasser- und Stoffumsätze in Großen Einzugsgebieten (7. Workshop zur großskaligen Modellierung in der Hydrologie, München, November 2003) (ed. by R. Ludwig, D. Reichert & W. Mauser), 111-122. Kassel University Press, Kassel, Germany.
6. Di Luzio, M., Srinivasan R., Arnold J. G. & Neitsch, S. L. (2002) Arcview Interface for SWAT2000 - User's Guide. Report TR-193, Texas Water Resources Institute, College Station, Texas.
7. DLR (1995) Landsat TM5-Szene aus dem Jahr 1995, Auflösung 25 × 25 m. Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt Köln.
8. Dobslaff, N. (2005) GIS-basierte Modellierung von Wasserhaushalt und Abflussbildung am Beispiel des Einzugsgebietes der oberen Stör. Diploma Thesis, Ecology Centre, Kiel University, Germany. http:// www.hydrology.uni-kiel.de/lehre/abschlussarbeiten/da_dobslaff.pdf.
9. EEA (European Environment Agency) (2000) Corine Landcover 250 m-Raster. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark.
10. Finnern, J. (1997) Böden und Leitbodengesellschaften des Störeinzugsgebietes in Schleswig-Holstein - Vergesellschaftung und Stoffaustragsprognose (K, Ca, Mg) mittels GIS. Schriftenreihe des Instituts für Pflanzenemährung und Bodenkunde der Universität Kiel, Nr. 37, Kiel, Germany.
11. Fohrer, N., Dey, T., Dobslaff, N. & Hörmann, G. (2006) Räumlich differenzierte hydrologische Modellierung norddeutscher Tieflandeinzugsgebiete am Beispiel der Treene und der Stör. Ecosys. Suppl. 46, 107-120.
12. Fohrer, N., Schmalz, B., Tavares, F. & Golon, J. (2007) Ansätze zur Integration von landwirtschaftlichen Dränagen in die Modellierung des Landschaftswasserhaushalts von mesoskaligen Tieflandeinzugsgebieten. Hydrologic & Wasserbewirtschaftung 51(4), 164-169.
13. Fujita, T. T. (1986) Mesoscale classifications: their history and their application to forecasting. In: Mesoscale Meteorology and Forecasting (ed. by P. S. Ray), Ch. 2, 18-35. American Meteorological Society, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
14. Habeck, A., Krysanova, V. & Hattermann, F. (2005) Integrated analysis of water quality in a mesoscale lowland basin. Adv. Geosci. 5, 13-17.
15. Hattermann, F. F., Krysanova, V., Habeck, A. & Bronstert, A. (2006) Integrating wetlands and riparian zones in river basin modelling. Ecol. Modell. 199 (4), 379-392.
16. Hörmann, G., Horn, A. & Fohrer, N. (2005) The evaluation of land-use options in mesoscale catchments - prospects and limitations of eco-bydrological models. Ecol. Modell. 187, 3-14.
17. Kieckbusch, J., Schrautzer, J. & Trepel, M. (2006) Spatial heterogeneity of water pathways in degenerated riverine peatlands. Basic and Appl. Ecol. 7, 388-397.
18. Krause, S. & Bronstert, A. (2005) An advanced approach for catchment delineation and water balance modelling within wetlands and floodplains. Adv. Geosci. 5, 1-5.
19. Krause, S. & Bronstert, A. (2007) The impact of groundwater-surface water interactions on the water balance of a mesoscale lowland river catchment in northeastern Germany. Hydrol. Processes 21, 169-184.
20. Krause, S., Bronstert, A. & Zehe, E. (2007a) Groundwater-surface water interactions in a north German lowland floodplain-implications for the river discharge dynamics and riparian water balance. J. Hydrol. 347, 404-417.
21. Krause, S., Jacobs, J. & Bronstert, A. (2007b) Modelling the impacts of land-use and drainage density on the water balance of a lowland floodplain landscape in northeast Germany. Ecol. Modell. 200(3-4), 475-492.
22. Krysanova, V., Müller-Wohlfeil, D.-I. & Becker, A. (1999) Development and test of a spatially distributed hydrological/water quality model for mesoscale watersheds. Ecol. Modell. 106 (1-2), 261-289.
23. LVA S-H (1995) Digitales Geländemodell DHM50 für Schleswig-Holstein. Gitterweite 50 × 50 m. Landesvermessungsamt Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
24. LVA S-H (2003) Basisgewässemetz des Landes Schleswig-Holstein. ATKIS-Objektart: Gewässerlinie. Landesvermessungsamt Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
25. Neitsch, S. L., Arnold, J. G., Kiniry, J. R., Srinivasan, R.& Williams, J. R. (2002a) Soil and Water Assessment Tool - User's Manual. Version 2000. Blackland Research & Extension Center, Temple, Texas, USA.
26. Neitsch, S. L., Arnold, J. G., Kiniry, J. R., Srinivasan, R., Williams, J. R. & King, K. W. (2002b) Soil and Water Assessment Tool - Theoretical Documentation. Version 2000. Blackland Research & Extension Center, Temple, Texas, USA.
27. Schmalz, B., Springer, P. & Fohrer, N. (2008) Interactions between near-surface groundwater and surface water in a drained riparian wetland. In: Groundwater-Surface Water Interactions: Process Understanding, Conceptualization and Modelling (Proc.Perugia Symp., July 2007) (ed. by C. Abesser, T. Wagener & G. Nuetzmann), 21-29. IAHS Publ. 321. IAHS Press, Wallingford, UK.
28. Singh, J., Knapp, H. V. & Demissie, M. (2004) Hydrologic modeling of the Iroquois River watershed using HSPF and SWAT. Illinois State Water Survey Contract Report. Illinois Department of Natural Resources, USA.
29. Sophocleous, M. (2002) Interactions between groundwater and surface water: the state of the science. Hydrogeol. J. 10, 52-67.
30. Tavares, F. (2006) Continuous, spatially distributed, stream flow and quality assessment of a lowland catchment in Northern Germany. MSc Thesis, Ecology Centre, Kiel University, Germany. http:// www.hydrology.uni-kiel.de/lehre/abschlussarbeiten/msc_tavares.pdf.
31. Venohr, M. (2000) Einträge und Abbau von Nährstoffen in Fließgewässern der oberen Stör. Diploma Thesis, Ecology Centre, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.
32. White, K. L. & Chaubey, L. (2005) Sensitivity analysis, calibration, and validations for a multisite and multivariable SWAT model. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 41(5), 1077-1089.