Urban location and housing prices within a hedonic model

Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 19-35

  Ottensmann, John R ^a   Payton, Seth ^a   Man, Joyce ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESSIBILITY; DECENTRALIZATION; EMPLOYMENT GENERATION; HEDONIC ANALYSIS; HOUSING MARKET; LABOR MOBILITY; LOCATION DECISION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PUBLIC ACCESS; URBAN HOUSING;

EID: 54349114471     PISSN: 10904999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Adair, A., S. McGreal, A. Smyth, J. Cooper and T. Ryley. 2000. House prices and accessibility: The testing of relationships within the Belfast urban area. Housing Studies 15(5): 699-716.
2. Alonso, W. 1964. Location and Land Use: Toward a General Theory of Land Rent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3. Anas, A., R. Arnott and K. Small. 1998. Urban spatial structure. Journal of Economic Literature 36(3): 1426-1464.
4. Bender, B. and H. Hwang. 1985. Hedonic house price indices and secondary employment centers. Journal of Urban Economics 17(1): 90-107.
5. Bowen, W. M., B. A. Mikelbank and D. M. Prestegaard. 2001. Theoretical and empirical considerations regarding space in hedonic housing price model applications. Growth and Change 32(4): 466-490.
6. Burnell, J. D. 1985. Industrial land use, externalities, and residential location. Urban Studies 22(5): 399-408.
7. Coulson, N. E. 1991. Really useful tests of the monocentric model. Land Economics 67(3): 299-307.
8. Day, B., I. Bateman and I. Lake. 2003. What price peace? A comprehensive approach to the specification and estimation of hedonic housing price models. Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGN) Working Paper EDM 03-08, University of East Anglia. Downloaded on April 23, 2006 from http://www.uea.ac.uk/env/cserge/pub/ wp/edm/edm_2003_08.pdf.
9. Des Rosiers, F., M. Thériault and P. Villeneuve. 2000. Sorting out access and neighborhood factors in hedonic price modeling. Journal of Property Investment & Finance 18(3): 291-315.
10. Detweiler, J. H. and R. E. Radigan. 1996. Computer-assisted real estate appraisal: A tool for the practicing appraiser. The Appraisal Journal 64(1): 91-100.
11. Espey, M. and H. Lopez. 2000. The impact of airport noise and proximity on residential property values. Growth and Change 31(3): 408-419.
12. Franklin, J. P. and P. Waddell. 2003. A hedonic regression of home prices in King County, Washington, using activity-specific accessibility measures. Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting. Downloaded on April 23, 2006 from http://www.ce.umn.edu/ ~levinson/pa8202/Waddell%20-%20Hedonic.pdf.
13. Guiliano, G. and K. A. Small. 1991. Subcenters in the Los Angeles region. Regional Science and Urban Economics 21(2): 163-182.
14. Gordon, P. and H. W. Richardson. 1983. Intercommunity distribution of tax and land value impacts of air pollution. Urban Ecology 7(2): 125-135.
15. Gordon, P. and H. L. Wong. 1986. The distribution of population and employment in a polycentric city: The case of Los Angeles. Environment and Planning A 19(2): 161-173.
16. Griffith, D. A. 1981. Modelling urban population density in a multi-centered city. Journal of Urban Economics 9(3): 298-310.
17. Hansen, W. G. 1959. How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 25(2): 73-76.
18. Hayes, K. J. and L. L. Taylor. 1996. Neighborhood school characteristics: What signals quality to homebuyers? Economic Review (Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas), Fourth Quarter, pp. 2-9.
19. Heikkila, E., P. Gordon, J. I. Kim, R. B. Peiser, H. W. Richardson and D. Dale-Johnson. 1989. Whatever happened to the CBD-distance gradient?: Land values in a polycentric city. Environment and Planning A 21(2): 221-232.
20. Ihlanfeldt, K. R. 1993. Intra-urban job accessibility and Hispanic youth employment rates. Journal of Urban Economics 33(2): 254-271.
21. Ihlanfeldt, K. R. and D. L. Sjoquist. 1990. Job accessibility and racial differences in youth employment rates. American Economic Review 80(1): 267-276.
22. Kain, J. F. and J. M. Quigley. 1970. Measuring the value of house quality. Journal of the American Statistical Association 65(330): 532-548.
23. Katz, L. and K. T. Rosen. 1987. The interjurisdictional effects of growth controls on housing prices. Journal of Law and Economics 30(1): 149-160.
24. Levinson, D. M. and K. J. Krizek (eds.). 2005. Access to Destinations. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
25. Malpezzi, S. 2003. Hedonic pricing models: A selective and applied review. In: T. O'Sullivan and K. Gibb (eds.) Housing Economics & Public Policy. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
26. McDonald, J. F. and D. P. McMillen. 1990. Employment subcenters and land values in a polycentric urban area: The case of Chicago. Environment and Planning A 22(12): 1561-1574.
27. McMillen, D. P. and J. F. McDonald. 1998. Suburban subcenters and employment density in metropolitan Chicago. Journal of Urban Economics 43(2): 157-180.
28. Mills, E. S. 1972. Studies in the Structure of the Urban Economy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press for Resources for the Future.
29. Mozolin, M. 1994. The geography of housing values in the transformation to a market economy: A case study of Moscow. Urban Geography 15(2): 107-127.
30. Muth, R. F. 1969. Cities and Housing: The Spatial Pattern of Urban Residential Land Use. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31. Nelson, J. P. 1977. Accessibility and the value of time in commuting. Southern Economic Journal 43(3): 1321-3129.
32. Nelson, J. P. 2004. Meta-analysis of airport noise and hedonic property values. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 38(1): 1-28.
33. Orford, S. 1999. Valuing the Built Environment: GIS and House Price Analysis. Aldershot: Ashgate.
34. Ottensmann, J. R. 1980. Changes in accessibility to employment in an urban area: Milwaukee, 1927-1963. Professional Geographer 32(4): 421-430.
35. Ottensmann, J. R. 2005. Accessibility in the luci2 simulation model and the importance of accessibility for urban development. In: D. M. Levinson and K. J. Krizek (eds) Access to Destinations. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
36. Pagourtzi, E., V. Assimakopoulos, T. Hatzichristos and N. French. 2003. Real estate appraisal: A review of valuation methods. Journal of Property Investment & Finance 21(4): 383-401.
37. Renne, J. S. 2003. Valuation methodologies for the assessment function, current and past practices. Assessment Journal 10(4): 103-108.
38. Rosen, S. 1974. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy 82(1): 34-55.
39. Small, K. A. and S. Song. 1994. Population and employment densities: Structure and change. Journal of Urban Economics 36(3): 292-313.
40. Song, S. 1994. Modelling worker residence distribution in the Los Angeles region. Urban Studies 31(9): 1533-1544.
41. Song, S. 1996. Some tests of alternative accessibility measures: A population density approach. Land Economics 72(4): 474-482.
42. Tomkins, J., N. Topham, J. Twomey and R. Ward. 1998. Noise versus Access: The impact of an airport in an urban property market. Urban Studies 35(2): 243-259.
43. U.S. Bureau of the Census. 2006. Census 2000 Summary File 3. Downloaded on April 3, 2006, from http://factfinder.census.gov.
44. Waddell, P., B. J. L. Berry and I. Hoch. 1993. Housing price gradients: The intersection of space and built form. Geographical Analysis 25(1): 5-19.
45. Witte, A. D., H. J. Sumka and H. Erekson. 1979. An estimate of a structural hedonic price model of the housing market: An application of Rosen's Theory of Implicit Markets. Econometrica 47(5): 1151-1173.