Charge fluctuations and superconductivity in an extended periodic Anderson model: A weak coupling theory

Journal of the Physical Society of Japan

Volumn 77, Issue 2, 2008, Pages

  Sugibayashi, Takashi ^a   Saiga, Yasuhiro ^a   Hirashima, Dai S ^a  

^a NAGOYA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Extended periodic Anderson model; Superconductivity; Valence fluctuations; Valence instability

Indexed keywords

EID: 54349111374     PISSN: 00319015     EISSN: 13474073     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1143/JPSJ.77.024716     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. K. Miyake, S. Schmitt-Rink, and C. M. Varma: Phys. Rev. B 34 (1986) 6554.
2. D. J. Scalapino, E. Loh, and J. E. Hirsch: Phys. Rev. B 34 (1986) 8190.
3. N. D. Mathur, F. M. Grosche, S. R. Julian, I. R. Walker, D. M. Freye, R. K. W. Haselwimmer, and G. G. Lonzarich: Nature 394 (1998) 39.
4. F. M. Grosche, S. R. Julian, N. D. Mathur, and G. G. Lonzarich: Physica B 223-224 (1996) 50.
5. A. T. Holmes, D. Jaccard, and K. Miyake: Phys. Rev. B 69 (2004) 024508.
6. A. T. Holmes, D. Jaccard, and K. Miyake: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 76 (2007) 051002.
7. H. Q. Yuan, F. M. Grosche, M. Deppe, C. Geibel, G. Sparn, and F. Steglich: Science 302 (2003) 2104.
8. G.-q. Zheng, N. Yamaguchi, H. Kan, Y. Kitaoka, J. L. Sarrao, P. G. Pagliuso, N. O. Moreno, and J. D. Thompson: Phys. Rev. B 70 (2004) 014511.
9. S. Kawasaki, G.-q. Zheng, H. Kan, Y. Kitaoka, H. Shishido, and Y. Ōnuki: Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 037007.
10. Y. Onishi and K. Miyake: Physica B 281-282 (2000) 191.
11. Y. Onishi and K. Miyake: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 69 (2000) 3955.
12. K. Miyake: J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19 (2007) 125201.
13. M. Grilli, R. Raimondi, C. Castellani, C. Di Castro, and G. Kotliar: Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 (1991) 259.
14. D. S. Hirashima, Y. Ōno, T. Matsuura, and Y. Kuroda: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 60 (1991) 1864.
15. D. S. Hirashima, Y. Ōno, T. Matsuura, and Y. Kuroda: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 61 (1992) 649.
16. S. Watanabe, M. Imada, and K. Miyake: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 75 (2006) 043710.
17. Y. Saiga, T. Sugibayashi, and D. S. Hirashima: to be published in Physica B.
18. K. Tanaka, H. Ikeda, Y. Nishikawa, and K. Yamada: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 75 (2006) 024713.
19. P. G. McQueen, D. W. Hess, and J. W. Serene: Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 129.
20. Â implies that A is a quantity having both orbital and spin suffixes. B̄ implies that B is a quantity having orbital suffixes only.
21. f = -1.5.
22. s ff (q) could be separated into intraband and interband contributions, the intraband component had a maximum at q = 0 as in the noninteracting case and made a dominant contribution to the effective interaction, attractive interaction in the spin triplet channel would be naturally expected. However, in general, the separation cannot be uniquely done in correlated cases. See, for example, M. Nakano: Phys. Rev. B 44 (1991) 10300.
23. H. D. Yang, P. Klavins, and R. N. Shelton: Phys. Rev. B 43 (1991) 7688.
24. Z. Hossain, M. Schmidt, W. Schnell, H. S. Jeevan, C. Geibel, S. Ramakrishnan, J. A. Mydosh, and Y. Grin: Phys. Rev. B 71 (2005) 060406.
25. T. Sugibayashi and D. S. Hirashima: Proc. 5th Int. Symp. ASR-WYP-2005: Advances in the Physics and Chemistry of Actinide Compounds, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 75 (2006) Suppl., p. 244.