In vitro regeneration of Pinus pinaster adult trees

Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 38, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 2607-2615

  De Diego, N ^a   Montalban I A ^a   Fernandez De Larrinoa, E ^a   Moncalean P ^a  

^a NEIKER and a Vaccine producing Commercial Company CZVSL   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPLICATION PROGRAMS; PLANTS (BOTANY); TISSUE CULTURE;

6-BENZYLADENINE; ABIOTIC STRESS; AXILLARY SHOOTS; BREEDING PROGRAM; MARITIME PINES; PINUS PINASTER; PINUS PINASTER AIT; TREE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM;

REFORESTATION;

ADULT; AGROFORESTRY; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CONIFEROUS TREE; REGENERATION;

BIOTECHNOLOGY; CYTOKININS; FORESTRY; GAIN; GENETIC ENGINEERING; PINUS PINASTER; PROPAGATION; TREES;

CONIFEROPHYTA; PINUS PINASTER;

EID: 54349107271     PISSN: 00455067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/X08-102     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Abdullah, A.A., Yeoman, M.M., and Grace, J. 1987. Micropropagation of mature Calabrian pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) from fascicular buds. Tree Physiol. 3: 123-136. PMID:14975825.
2. Alonso, P., Moncaleán, P., Fernández, B., Rodř́guez, A., Centeno, M.L., and Ordás, R. 2006. An improved micropropagation protocol for stone pine (Pinus pinea L.). Ann. For. Sci. 63: 879-885. doi:10.1051/forest:2006071.
3. Bonga, J.M., and von Aderkas, P. 1993. Rejuvenation of tissues from mature conifers and its implications for clonal propagation in vitro. In Clonal forestry: genetics, biotechnology and application. Edited by M.R. Ahuja and W.J. Libby. Springer-Verlag, New York. pp. 182-199.
4. Brown, C.L., and Gifforn, E.M. 1954. The relation of the cotyledons to root development of pine embryos grown in vitro. Plant Physiol. 33: 57-64.
5. Brown, M.B., and Forsythe, A.B. 1974. Robust test for the equality of variance. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 69: 364-367. doi:10.2307/2285659.
6. Calixto, F., and Pais, S. 1997. Adventitious shoot formation and plant regeneration from Pinus pinaster Sol. ex Aiton. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant, 33: 119-124. doi:10.1007/s11627-997-0008-8.
7. Campbell, M.M., Brunner, M.M., Jones, H.M., and Strauss, S.H. 2003. Forestry's fertile crescent: the applications of biotechnology to trees. Plant Biotechnol. J. 1: 141-154. doi:10.1046/j.1467-7652.2003.00020.x. PMID:17156028.
8. Capuana, M., and Giannini, R. 1995. In vitro plantlet regeneration from embryogenic explants of Pinus pinea L. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant, 31: 202-206. doi:10.1007/BF02632022.
9. Carson, M.J., Burdon, R.D., Carson, S.D., Firth, A., Shelbourne, C.J.A., and Vincent, T.G. 1990. Realising genetic gains in production forests. In Breeding and Genetic Resources: Proceedings, Joint Meeting of Western Forest Genetics Association and IUFRO Working Parties on Douglas fir, Lodgepole pine, Sitka and Abies spp. (S2.02.05, S2.02.06, S2.02.12, and S2.02.14), August 1990, Olympia. Wash.
10. David, A. 1964. Physiologie vegetale - recherches preliminaries sur les cultures de Pinus pinaster - realisation de cultures initials. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris. 258: 695-695.
11. David, A., David, H., and Mateille, T. 1982. In vitro adventitious budding on Pinus pinaster cotyledons and needles. Physiol. Plant. 56: 102-107. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1982.tb04906.x.
12. Debergh, P., Aitken-Christie, J., Cohen, D., Grout, B., von Arnold, S., Zimmerman, R., and Ziv, M. 1992. Reconsideration of the term vitrification as used in micropropagation. Plant Cell Tissue Organ. Cult. 30: 135-140. doi:10.1007/BF00034307.
13. Druart, P., Kevers, C., Boxus, P., and Gaspar, T. 1982. In vitro promotion of root formation by apple shoots through darkness effects on endogenous phenols and peroxidases. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 108: 429-436.
14. Dumas, E., and Monteuuis, O. 1995. In vitro rooting of micropropagated shoots from juvenile and mature Pinus pinaster explants: influence of activated charcoal. Plant Cell Tissue Org. Cult. 40: 231-235. doi:10.1007/BF00048128.
15. Dumas, E., Franclet, A., and Monteuuis, O. 1989. Microgreffage de méristèmes primaires caulinaires de Pins maritimes (Pinus pinaster Ait.) âgés sur de jeunes semis cultivés in vitro. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris. 309: 723-728.
16. Duncan, D.B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F test. Biometrics, 11: 1-42. doi:10.2307/3001478.
17. Fridborg, G., Pedersen, M., Landstrom, L.E., and Eriksson, T. 1978. The effect of activated charcoal on tissue cultures: adsorption of metabolites inhibiting morphogenesis. Physiol. Plant. 43: 104-106. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1978.tb01575.x.
18. Giri, C.C., Shyamkumar, B., and Anjaneyulu, C. 2004. Progress in tissue culture, genetic transformation and applications of biotechnology to trees: an overview. Trees (Berl.), 18: 115-135.
19. Greenwood, M.S. 1995. Juvenility and maturation in conifers: current concepts. Tree Physiol. 15: 433-438. PMID:14965924.
20. Gupta, P.K., and Durzan, D.J. 1985. Shoot multiplication from mature trees of Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and sugar pine (Pinus lambertiana). Plant Cell Rep. 4: 177-179. doi:10.1007/BF00269282.
21. Haffner, V., Enjalric, F., Lardet, L., and Carron, M.P. 1991. Maturation of woody plants: a review of metabolic and genomic aspects. Ann. Sci. For. 48: 615-630. doi:10.1051/forest:19910601.
22. Hargreaves, C.L., Grace, C.L., van der Maas, S.A., Menzies, M.I., Kumar, S., Holden, D.G., Foggo, M.N., Low, C.B., and Dible, M.J. 2005. Comparative in vitro and early nursery performance of adventitious shoots from cryopreserved cotyledons and axillary shoots from epicotyls of the same zygotic embryo of control-pollinated Pinus radiata. Can. J. For. Res. 35: 2629-2641. doi:10.1139/x05-178.
23. Harvengt, L. 2005. Somatic embryogenesis in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.). In Protocols for somatic embryogenesis in woody plants. Edited by S.M. Jain and P.K. Gupta. Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands. pp. 107-119.
24. Hopkins, E.R., and Butcher, T.B. 1993. Provenance comparisons of Pinus pinaster (Ait.) in Western Australia. CALMScience, 1: 55-105.
25. Horgan, K. 1987. Pinus radiata. In Tissue culture in forestry. Vol. 3. Edited by J.M. Bonga and D.J. Durzan. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands. pp. 128-145.
26. Hugues-Jarlet, E., and Nitsch, C. 1988. É tude préliminaire de l'utilisation des bourgeons floraux de Pinus pinaster Sol. In Micropropagation vegetative in vitro. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris. 307(3):875-880.
27. Jördy, M. 2004. Seasonal variation of organogenetic activity and reserves allocation in the shoot apex of Pinus pinaster Ait. Ann. Bot. (Lond.), 93: 25-37. doi:10.1093/aob/mch005. PMID:14678942.
28. Kanowski, P.J. 1997. Plantation forestry for the 21st century. In Proceedings of the XI World Forestry Congress, 13-22 October 1997, Antalya, Turkey.
29. Lambardi, M., Sharma, K.K., and Thorpe, T.A. 1993. Optimization of in vitro bud induction and plantlet formation from mature embryos of aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis Mill). In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant, 29: 189-199.
30. Lelu-Walter, M., Bernier-Cardou, M., and Klimaszewska, K. 2006. Simplified and improved somatic embryogenesis for clonal propagation of Pinus pinaster (Ait.). Plant Cell Rep. 25: 767-776. doi:10.1007/s00299- 006-0115-8. PMID:16518635.
31. Lloyd, G., and McCown, B. 1980. Commercially feasible micropropagation of mountain laurel Kalmia latifolia by use of shoot-tip culture. Proc. Int. Plant Propag. Soc. 30: 421-427.
32. Malabadi, R.B., and van Staden, J. 2005. Somatic embryogenesis from vegetative shoots apices of mature trees of Pinus patula. Tree Physiol. 25: 11-16. PMID:15519981.
33. Menzies, M.I., and Aimers-Halliday, J. 1997. Propagation options for clonal forestry with radiata pine. Genetics of radiata pine. Proceedings IUFRO Conference, Rotorua, New Zealand. FRI Bull. 203: 256-263.
34. Menzies, M.I., Dibley, M.J., Faulds, T., Aimmers-Hallidays, J., and Holden, D.G. 2000. Research note: morphological markers of physiological age of Pinus radiata D. Don. N.Z. J. For. Sci. 30: 359-364.
35. Miguel Pérez, I., González Marť́nez, S.C., Aľ́a Miranda, R., and Gil Sánchez, L. 2002. Growth phenology and mating system of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Aiton) in central Spain. Invest. Agraria Sist. Recur. For. 11: 193-204.
36. Monteuuis, O., and Dumas, E. 1992. Morphological features as indicators of maturity in acclimatized Pinus pinaster from different in vitro origins. Can. J. For. Res. 22: 1417-1421. doi:10.1139/x92-188.
37. Parasharami, V.A., Poonawala, I.S., and Nadgauda, R.S. 2003. Bud break and plantlet regeneration in vitro from mature trees of Pinus roxburghii Sarg. Curr. Sci. 84: 203-208.
38. Park, Y.S., and Bonga, J.M. 1992. Conifers micropropagation: its function in tree improvement programs. In Micropropagation of woody plants. Edited by M.R. Ahuja. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands. pp. 457-470.
39. Pan, J.J., and van Staden, J. 1998. The use of charcoal in in vitro culture - a review. Plant Growth Regul. 26: 155-163. doi:10.1023/A:1006119015972.
40. Pierik, R.L.M. 1990. Rejuvenation and micropropagation. Progress in plant cellular and molecular biology. In Proceedings of the VIIth International Congress on Plant Tissue and Cell Culture, 24-29 June 1990, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Edited by H.J.J. Nikkamp, L.H.W. Van Der Plas, and J. Van Aatrijk. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amersterdam. pp. 91-101.
41. Pullman, G.S., and Timmis, R. 1992. Establishment of juvenile-like shoot culture and plantlets from 4-16 year-old Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) trees. Plant Cell Tissue Org. Cult. 29: 187-198. doi:10.1007/BF00034352.
42. Quorin, M., and Lepoivre, P. 1977. É tude de milieux adaptés aux culture de prunus. Acta Hortic. 78: 437-442.
43. Rancillac, M., Faye, M., and David, A. 1982. In vitro rooting of cloned shoots in Pinus pinaster. Physiol. Plant. 56: 97-101. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1982.tb04905.x.
44. Renau-Morata, B., Ollero, J., Arrillaga, I., and Segura, J. 2005. Factors influencing axillary shoots proliferation and adventitious budding in cedar. Tree Physiol. 25: 477-486. PMID:15687096.
45. Scholes, R.J., and Noble, I.R. 2001. Climate change: storing carbon and land. Science (Washington, D.C.), 294: 1012-1013. doi:10.1126/science. 1065307. PMID:11691975.
46. Shapiro, S.S., and Wilk, M.B. 1965. Variance test for normality. Biometrika, 52: 591-611.
47. Suárez, M.F., Á vila, C., Gallardo, F., Cantón, F.R., Claros, M.G., and Cánovas, F.M. 2002. Molecular and enzymatic analysis of ammonium assimilation in woody plants. J. Exp. Bot. 53: 891-904. doi:10.1093/jexbot/53.370.891. PMID:11912232.
48. Sul, I.W., and Korban, S.S. 2004. Effect of salt formulations, carbon sources, cytokinins, and auxins on shoot organogenesis from cotyledons of Pinus pinea L. Plant Growth Regul. 43: 197-205. doi:10.1023/B:GROW.0000046013.47892.4f.
49. Tereso, S., Gonçalves, S., Marum, L., Oliveira, M., Maroco, J., and Miguel, C. 2006. Improved axillary and adventitious bud regeneration from Portuguese genotypes of Pinus pinaster Ait. Prop. Orn. Plants, 6: 24-33.
50. Thorpe, T.A., Harry, I.S., and Kumar, P.P. 1991. Application of micropropagation to forestry. In Micropropagation: technology and application. Edited by P.C. Debergh and R.H. Zimmerman. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands. pp. 311-316.
51. Tuskan, G.A., Sargent, W.A., Rensema, T., and Walla, J.A. 1990. Influence of plant growth regulators, basal media and carbohydrate levels on the in vitro development of Pinus ponderosa (Dougl. ex Law.) cotyledon explants. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 20: 47-52. doi:10.1007/ BF00034756.
52. von Aderkas, P., and Bonga, J.M. 2000. Influencing micropropagation and somatic embryogenesis in mature trees by manipulation of phase change, stress and culture environment. Tree Physiol. 20: 921-928. PMID:11303566.
53. Walter, C., Charity, J., Grace, L., Höfig, K., Möller, R., and Wagner, A. 2002. Gene technologies in Pinus radiata and Picea abies: tools for conifer biotechnology in the 21st century. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 70: 3-12. doi:10.1023/A:1016032903724.
54. Zhang, H., Horgan, K.J., Reynolds, P.H.S., and Jameson, P.E. 2003. Cytokinins and buds morphology in Pinus radiata. Physiol. Plant. 117: 264-269. doi:10.1034/j.1399-3054.2003.00026.x.