Lakeside riparian forests support diversity of wood fungi in managed boreal forests

Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 38, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 2650-2659

  Komonen, Atte ^a   Niemi, Mari E ^b   Junninen, Kaisa ^b  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEBRIS; FUNGI; LANDFORMS; WOOD;

BOREAL FORESTS; BROADLEAVED TREES; EASTERN FINLAND; FUNGAL SPECIES; GREAT-ER; GROWTH FORESTS; INDICATOR SPECIES; RIPARIAN; RIPARIAN BUFFER ZONES; RIPARIAN FORESTS; SPECIES COMPOSITIONS; SPECIES RICHNESSES; TREE SPECIES COMPOSITIONS; WOODY DEBRIS;

FORESTRY;

BOREAL FOREST; BUFFER ZONE; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FUNGUS; RIPARIAN FOREST; SPECIES DIVERSITY; SPECIES RICHNESS; WOODY DEBRIS;

DEAD WOOD; FIBER DEBRIS; FORESTRY; FUNGI; GROWTH; HARDWOODS;

EURASIA; EUROPE; FINLAND; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA;

APHYLLOPHORALES; FUNGI;

EID: 54349103583     PISSN: 00455067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/X08-105     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Ahti, T., Hämet-Ahti, L., and Jalas, J. 1968. Vegetation zones and their sections in northeastern Europe. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 5: 169-211.
2. Auvinen, A.-P., and Kaipiainen, H. 2005. Elinympäristöjen pintaalojen arvioiminen. [Estimating areas of habitat types.] In Suomen biodiversiteettiohjelman arviointi. [Evaluation of the Finnish National Action Plan for Biodiversity]. Edited by M. Hildén, A.-P. Auvinen, and E. Primmer. The Finnish Environment No. 770. Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki. pp. 245-248.
3. Barker, J.R., Ringold, P.L., and Bollman, M. 2002. Patterns of tree dominance in coniferous riparian forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 166: 311-329. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00683-1.
4. Blinn, C.R., and Kilgore, M.A. 2001. Riparian management practices: a summary of state guidelines. J. For. 99: 11-17.
5. Cajander, A.K. 1926. The theory of forest types. Acta For. Fenn. 29: 1-108.
6. Colwell, R.K. 2006. EstimateS: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 8.0. Available from http://purl.oclc.org/estimates.
7. Connell, J.H. 1978. Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science (Washington, D.C.), 199: 1302-1310. doi:10.1126/science.199.4335. 1302. PMID:17840770.
8. Doyle, A.T. 1990. Use of riparian and upland habitats by small mammals. J. Mammal. 71: 14-23. doi:10.2307/1381312.
9. Gotelli, N.J., and Colwell, R.K. 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol. Lett. 4: 379-391. doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00230.x.
10. Hannon, S.J., Paszkowski, C.A., Boutin, S., DeGroot, J., Macdonald, S.E., Wheatley, M., and Eaton, B. 2002. Influence of varying riparian buffer strip widths on abundance and species composition of amphibians, small mammals and songbirds in the boreal mixedwood forest of Alberta. Can. J. For. Res. 32: 1784-1800. doi:10.1139/x02-092.
11. Harper, K.S., and Macdonald, S.E. 2001. Structure and composition of riparian boreal forest: new methods for analysing edge influence. Ecology, 82: 649-659.
12. Harper, K.A., Macdonald, S.E., Burton, P.J., Chen, J., Brosofske, K.D., Saunders, S.C., Euskirchen, E.S., Roberts, D., Jaiteh, M.S., and Esseen, P.-A. 2005. Edge influence on forest structure and composition in fragmented landscapes. Conserv. Biol. 19: 768-782. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005. 00045.x.
13. Junninen, K., and Kouki, J. 2006. Are woodland key habitats in Finland hotspots for polypores (Basidiomycota)? Scand. J. For. Res. 21: 32-40. doi:10.1080/02827580500530009.
14. Kenttämies, K., and Saukkonen, S. 1996. Metsätalous ja vesistöt. [Forestry and waters.] Yhteistutkimusprojektin "Metsätalouden vesistöhaitat ja niiden torjunta" (METVE) yhteenveto. [Preventing harmful effects of forestry on waters, research report.] Publications of the Ministry of Agriculture & Forestry No. 4. Helsinki, Finland.
15. Kotiranta, H., and Niemelä, T. 1996. Uhanalaiset käävät Suomessa. [Threatened polypores in Finland.] Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki, Finland.
16. Latva-Karjanmaa, T., Penttilä, R., and Siitonen, J. 2007. The demographic structure of European aspen (Populus tremula) populations in managed and old-growth boreal forests in eastern Finland. Can. J. For. Res. 37: 1070-1081. doi:10.1139/X06-289.
17. Macdonald, E., Burgess, C.J., Scrimgeour, G.J., Boutin, S., Reedyk, S., and Kotak, B. 2004. Should riparian buffers be part of forest management based on emulation of natural disturbance? For. Ecol. Manage. 187: 185-196. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00330-X.
18. Macdonald, S.E., Eaton, B., Machtans, C.S., Paszkowski, C., Hannon, S., and Boutin, S. 2006. Is forest close to lakes ecologically unique? Analysis of vegetation, small mammals, amphibians, and songbirds. For. Ecol. Manage. 223: 1-17. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2005.06.017.
19. Magurran, A.E. 2004. Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
20. Martin, D.J., and Grotefendt, R.A. 2007. Stand mortality in buffer strips and the supply of woody debris to streams in Southeast Alaska. Can. J. For. Res. 37: 36-49. doi:10.1139/X06-209.
21. McCune, B., and Mefford, M.J. 1999. PC-ORD. Multivariate analysis of ecological data. Version 4. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, Ore.
22. Naiman, R.J., and Décamps, H. 1997. The ecology of interfaces: riparian zones. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28: 621-658. doi:10. 1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.621.
23. Naiman, R.J., Décamps, H., and Pollock, M. 1993. The role of riparian corridors in maintaining regional diversity. Ecol. Appl. 3: 209-212. doi:10.2307/1941822.
24. Niemelä, T. 2005. Käävät - puiden sienet. [Polypores - lignicolous fungi.] Museum of Natural History, Helsinki, Finland, Norrlinia No. 13.
25. Nordén, B., Ryberg, M., Götmark, F., and Olausson, B. 2004. Relative importance of coarse and fine woody debris for the diversity of wood-inhabiting fungi in temperate broadleaf forests. Biol. Conserv. 117: 1-10. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00235-0.
26. Pabst, R.J., and Spies, T.A. 1999. Structure and composition of unmanaged riparian forests in the coastal mountains of Oregon, U.S.A. Can. J. For. Res. 29: 1557-1573. doi:10.1139/cjfr-29-10-1557.
27. Penttilä, R., Siitonen, J., and Kuusinen, M. 2004. Polypore diversity in managed and old-growth boreal Picea abies forests in southern Finland. Biol. Conserv. 117: 271-283. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2003. 12.007.
28. Rassi, P., Alanen, A., Kanerva, T., and Mannerkoski, I. (Editors). 2001. Suomen lajien uhanalaisuus. [The 2000 red list of Finnish species.] Ministry of the Environment, Helsinki, Finland. Rayner, A.D.M., and Boddy, L. 1988. Fungal communities in the decay of wood. Adv. Microb. Ecol. 10: 115-166.
29. Renvall, P. 1995. Community structure and dynamics of wood-rotting Basidiomycetes on decomposing conifer trunks in northern Finland. Karstenia, 35: 1-51.
30. Rodewald, A.D., and Bakermans, M.H. 2006. What is the appropriate paradigm for riparian forest conservation? Biol. Conserv. 128: 193-200. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.041.
31. Sabo, J.L., Sponseller, R., Dixon, M., Gade, K., Harms, T., Heffernan, J., Jani, A., Katz, G., Soykan, C., Watts, J., and Welter, J. 2005. Riparian zones increase regional species richness by harboring different, not more, species. Ecology, 86: 56-62. doi:10.1890/04-0668.
32. Sakai, T., Tanaka, H., Shibata, M., Suzuki, W., Nomiya, H., Kanazashi, T., Iida, S., and Nakashizuka, T. 1999. Riparian disturbance and community structure of a Quercus-Ulmus forest in central Japan. Plant Ecol. 140: 99-109. doi:10.1023/A:1009775512938.
33. Seaby, R.M., and Henderson, P.A. 2006. Species diversity and richness. Version 4. Pisces Conservation Ltd., Lymington, UK.
34. Siitonen, J. 2001. Forest management, coarse woody debris and saproxylic organisms: Fennoscandian boreal forests as an example. Ecol. Bull. 49: 11-41.
35. Siitonen, J., and Ollikainen, M. 2006. Talousmetsät. [Production forests.] In Metson jäljillä. Etelä-Suomen metsien monimuotoisuusohjelman tutkimusraportti. [Forest biodiversity programme in southern Finland, research report.] Edited by P. Horne, T. Koskela, M. Kuusinen, A. Otsamo, and K. Syrjänen. Ministry of Agriculture & Forestry, Ministry of the Environment, Finnish Forest Research Institute and Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki, Finland. pp. 53-85.
36. Silvennoinen, P. 2000. Heinäveden alue-ekologinen suunnitelma. [Landscape ecological forest plan of Heinävesi.] Finnish Forest and Park Service, Helsinki, Finland.
37. Sippola, A.-L., Mönkkönen, M., and Renvall, P. 2005. Polypore diversity in the herb-rich woodland key habitats of Koli National Park in eastern Finland. Biol. Conserv. 126: 260-269. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005. 06.002.
38. Suzuki, W., Osumi, K., Masaki, T., Takahashi, K., Daimaru, H., and Hoshizaki, K. 2002. Disturbance regimes and community structures of a riparian and an adjacent terrace stand in the Kanumazawa Riparian Research Forest, northern Japan. For. Ecol. Manage. 157: 285-301. doi:10.1016/S0378- 1127(00)00667-8.
39. Whitaker, D.M., and Montevecchi, W.A. 1997. Breeding bird assemblages associated with riparian, interior forest, and nonriparian edge habitats in a balsam fir ecosystem. Can. J. For. Res. 27: 1159-1167. doi:10.1139/cjfr-27-8-1159.
40. Wimberly, M.C., and Spies, T.A. 2001. Influences of environment and disturbance on forest patterns in coastal Oregon watersheds. Ecology, 82: 1443-1459.
41. Niemelä, T. 2005. Käävät - puiden sienet. [Polypores - lignicolous fungi.] Museum of Natural History, Helsinki, Finland, Norrlinia No. 13.
42. Rassi, P., Alanen, A., Kanerva, T., and Mannerkoski, I. (Editors). 2001. Suomen lajien uhanalaisuus. [The 2000 red list of Finnish species.] Ministry of the Environment, Helsinki, Finland.