Towards a convenient way to practice Medical Oncology

Annals of Oncology

Volumn 18, Issue SUPPL. 2, 2007, Pages

  Pavlidis, N ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOANNINA   (Greece)

^b ESMO HEAD OFFICE   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL PRACTICE; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; ONCOLOGY; PATIENT CARE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; STANDARD; TREATMENT PLANNING;

EUROPE; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; MEDICAL ONCOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL;

EID: 54349102806     PISSN: 09237534     EISSN: 15698041     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdm014     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Field, Lohr KN. Attributes of good practice guidelines. In Field M, Lohr KN (eds) Clinical Practice Guidelines: Directions for a New Program, Washington, DC: National Academy Press 1990; 53-77.
2. Woolf SH, Grol R, Hutchinson A et al. Clinical guidelines: Potential benefits, limitations and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ 1999; 318: 527-530.
3. Eisenberg J, Power E. Transforming insurance coverage into quality healthcare: Voltage drops from potential to delivered quality. JAMA 2000; 284: 2100-2107.
4. Farquhar CM, Kofa EW, Slutsky JR. Clinicians' attitudes to clinical practice guidelines: A systematic review. Med J Aust 2002; 177 (9): 502-506.
5. Graham ID, Evans WK, Logan D et al. Canadian oncologists and clinical practice guidelines: A national survey of attitudes and reported use. Provincial Lung Disease Site Group of Cancer Care Ontario. Oncology 2000; 59 (4): 283-290.