The use of airborne LiDAR data for the analysis of debris flow events in Switzerland

Natural Hazards and Earth System Science

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 1113-1127

  Scheidl, C ^a   Rickenmann, D ^a,b   Chiari, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND LIFE SCIENCES   (Austria)

^b SWISS FEDERAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE WSL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALPINE ENVIRONMENT; DEBRIS FLOW; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; LIDAR; TESTING METHOD;

BERN [SWITZERLAND]; CENTRAL EUROPE; EURASIA; EUROPE; SWITZERLAND;

EID: 54349100224     PISSN: 15618633     EISSN: 16849981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5194/nhess-8-1113-2008     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Axelsson, P.: DEM generation from laser scanner data using adaptive TIN models, International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 23, 111-118, 2000.
2. Bezzola, G. R. and Hegg, C. (Eds.): Ereignisanalyse Hochwasser 2005, Teil 1 - Prozesse, Schäden und eine erste Einordnung, 0707, Bundesamt für Umwelt BAFU, Eidgenssische Forschungsanstalt WSL. Umwelt-Wissen, 2007.
3. Cavalli, M. and Marchi, L.: Characterisation of the surface morphology of an alpine alluvial fan using airborne LiDAR, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 8, 323-333, 2008, http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/8/323/2008/.
4. Cavalli, M., Tarolli, P., Marchi, L., and Dalla Fontana, G.: The effectiveness of airborne LiDAR data in the recognition of channelbed morphology, Catena, 73, 249-260, 2008.
5. Costa, J. E.: Physical Geomorphology of Debris Flows, in: Developments and Applications of Geomorphology, edited by: Costa, J. E. and Fleisher, P., pp. 268-317, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 1984.
6. Gertsch, E. and Kienholz, H.: Ereignisdokumentation StorMe, Unwetter 22./23. August 2005, Gemeinde Lütschental, Tech. rep., Angewandte Geomorphologie und Naturrisiken AGNAT; Geographisches Institut Universität Bern, 2005.
7. Häberli, J.: Unwetter 2005: Organisation und Anwendung verschiedener Bilddaten im Kanton Bern, Geomatik, 9, 498-501, 2006.
8. Hodgson, M. E., Jensen, J. R., Smidt, L., Schill, S., and Davis, B.: An evaluation of LIDAR- and IFSAR-derived digital elevation models in leaf-on conditions with USGS Level 1 and Level 2 DEMs, Rem. Sens. Environ., 84, 295-308, 2003.
9. Hooke, R. L. B. and Rohrer, W. R.: Processes on arid-region alluvial fans, J. Geol., 75, 438-460, 1967.
10. Ikeya, H.: Debris flow and its countermeasures in Japan, Bulletin International Ass. Engineering Geol., 40, 15-33, 1989.
11. Iverson, R. M., Schilling, S. P., and Vallance, J. W.: Objective delineation of lahar-inundation hazard zones, GSABull., 110, 972-984, 1998.
12. James, L. A., Watson, D. G., and Hansen, W. R: Using LiDAR data to map gullies and headwater streams under forest canopy: South Carolina, USA, Catena, 71, 132-144, doi:10.1016/j.catena.2006. 10.010, 2007.
13. Kraus, K.: Eine neue Methode zur Interpolation und Filterung von Daten mit schiefer Fehlerverteilung., Österreichische Zeitschrift für Vermessung und Geoinformation (VGI), 1, 25-30, 1997.
14. Kraus, K. and Pfeifer, N.: Advanced DTM generation from Li-DAR data, International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 24, 23-30, 2001.
15. Landtwing, S.: Airborne Laser Scanning - Genauigkeits-informationen für den Auswertungsprozess, Master's thesis, ETH - Eid-genössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, 2005.
16. Legros, F.: The mobility of long-runout landslides, Eng. Geol., 63, 301-331, 2002.
17. Lillesand, T. M., Kiefer, R. W., and Chipman, J. W.: Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation, Wiley, fifth edn., 2004.
18. Lloyd, C. and Atkinson, P.: Deriving DSMs from LiDAR data with kriging, Int. J. Rem. Sens., 23, 2519-2524, 2002.
19. Marchi, L., Cavalli, M., Grisotto, S., Mazzorana, B., Trevisani, S., and Zannoni, A.: Interreg III Project Alpine Space Disaster Information System of Alpine Regions (DIS-ALP) Work Package 7-Innovative Tools for Information Collection, unpublished, 2006.
20. Mizuyama, T., Kobashi, S., and Ou, G.: Prediction of debris flow peak discharge, in: International Congress Interpraevent, vol. 4, pp. 99-108, 1992.
21. NDR Consulting Zimmermann/Niederer und Pozzi Umwelt AG: Lokale lösungsorientierte Ereignisanalyse, Glyssibach, Bericht zum Vorprojekt, Tech. rep., Tiefbauamt des Kantons Bern, 2006.
22. Optech: Manufacturer of world class LiDAR solutions, http://www.optech. ca, 26 February 2008.
23. Rickenmann, D.: Empirical Relationships for Debris Flows, Nat. Hazards, 19, 47-77, 1999.
24. Rickenmann, D., Hunzinger, L., and Cosandey, A.-C.: Gerin-neprozesse, in: Ereignisanalyse Hochwasser 2005. Teil 1 - Prozesse, Schäden und erste Einordnung., edited by: Bezzola, G. R. and Hegg, C., 0707, pp. 163-180, Bundesamt fur Umwelt-BAFU, Eidgenössische Forschungsanstalt WSL, Umwelt-Wissen, 2007.
25. Scheidegger, A. E.: On the prediction of the reach and velocity of catastrophic landslides, Rock Mech., 5, 231-236, 1973.
26. Takahashi, T., Sawada, H., Suwa, T., Mizuyama, T., Mizuhara, K., Wu, J., Tang, B., Kang, Z., and Zhou, B.: Japan-China joint research on the prevention from debris flow hazards, in: Research Report, Japanese Ministry of Eductaion, Science and Culture, Int. Scientific Research Program, edited by: Japanese Ministry of Eductaion, S. and Culture, 03044085, 1994.
27. TopoSys: Topographische Systemdaten GmbH., http://www.toposys.de/, 29 December 2007.
28. Vosselman, G.: Slope based filtering of laser altimetry data, International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 23, 935-942, 2000.
29. White, S. A. and Wang, Y.: Utilizing DEMs derived from LiDAR data to analyze morphologic change in the North Carolina coastline, Remote Sens. Environ., 85, 39-47, 2003.
30. Woolard, J. W. and Colby, J. D.: Spatial characterization, resolution, and volumetric change of coastal dunes using airborne LIDAR: Cape Hatteras, North Carolina, Geomorphology, 48, 269-287, 2002.