Gender and household education expenditure in Pakistan

Applied Economics

Volumn 40, Issue 20, 2008, Pages 2573-2591

  Aslam, Monazza ^a   Kingdon, Geeta Gandhi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENDER ROLE; HOUSEHOLD EXPENDITURE; HOUSEHOLD SURVEY; SECONDARY EDUCATION; SEX-RELATED DIFFERENCE;

ASIA; EURASIA; PAKISTAN; SOUTH ASIA;

EID: 54349086142     PISSN: 00036846     EISSN: 14664283     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00036840600970252     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ahmad, A. and Morduch, J. (2002) Identifying sex bias in the allocation of household resources: Evidence from linked household surveys from Bangladesh. mimeo
2. Alderman, H., Behrman, JR, Ross, D. and Sabot, R. (1996) Decomposing the gender gap in cognitive skills in a poor rural economy. The Journal of Human Resources, 31, pp. 229-254.
3. Angrist, J., Lavy, V. and Schlosser, A. (2005) New evidence on the causal link between the quantity and quality of children
4. Aslam, M. (2003) The determinants of pupil achievement in government and private schools in Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review, 42, pp. 841-876.
5. Aslam, M. (2005) The relative effectiveness of government and private schools in Pakistan. mimeo, Department of Economics, University of Oxford
6. Aslam, M. (2006) Returns to education by gender in Pakistan. mimeo, Department of Economics, University of Oxford
7. Aslam, M. and Kingdon, GG (2005) Gender and household education expenditure in Pakistan
8. Ashraf, J. and Ashraf, B. (1993) Estimating the gender wage gap in Rawalpindi city. The Pakistan Development Review, 29, pp. 365-376.
9. Beneito, P. (2003) A complete system of Engel curves in the Spanish economy. Applied Economics, 35, pp. 803-816.
10. Bhalotra, S. and Attfield, C. (1998) Intrahousehold resource allocation in Rural Pakistan: A semiparametric analysis. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 13, pp. 463-480.
11. Case, A. and Deaton, A. (2003) Consumption
12. Deaton, A. (1997) The Analysis of Household Surveys: A Microeconometric Approach to Development Policy, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
13. Deaton, A. and Paxton, C. (1998) Economies of Scale, Household Size, and the Demand for Food. Journal of Political Economy, 106, pp. 897-910.
14. GOP (2002) Pakistan Integrated Household Survey, Enumerator's Manual of Instructions, Round 4: 2001-2002, Federal Bureau of Statistics, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad
15. Hazarika, G. (2000) Gender differences in children's nutrition and access to health care in Pakistan. The Journal of Development Studies, 37, pp. 73-92.
16. Hazarika, G. and Bedi, AS (2003) Schooling costs and child work in Rural Pakistan. The Journal of Development Studies, 39, pp. 29-64.
17. Jensen, R. (2002) Equal treatment
18. Kingdon, GG (2005) Where has all the bias gone? Detecting gender bias in the intrahousehold allocation of educational expenditure. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 53, pp. 409-451.
19. Lancaster, G., Maitra, P. and Ray, R. (2003) Endogenous power
20. Lloyd, CB, Mete., C and Sathar, ZA (2002) The effect of gender differences in primary school access
21. Quisumbing, AR and Maluccio, JA (2000) Intrahousehold allocation and gender relations: New empirical evidence from four developing countries
22. Rose, E. (1999) Consumption smoothing and excess female mortality in Rural India. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 81, pp. 41-49.
23. Siddiqui, R. and Siddiqui, R. (1998) A decomposition of male-female earnings differentials. The Pakistan Development Review, 37, pp. 885-898.
24. Subramanian, S. (1995) Gender discrimination in intra-household allocation in India
25. Subramanian, S. and Deaton, A. (1990) Gender effects in Indian consumption patterns
26. Subramanian, S. and Deaton, A. (1991) Gender effects in Indian consumption patterns. Sarvekshana, 14, pp. 1-12.
27. Wooldridge, JM (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
28. Yen, S. (2005) Zero observations and gender differences in cigarette consumption. Applied Economics, 37, pp. 1839-1849.