The turn to statism in russian economic policy?

International Spectator

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 29-42

  Hanson, Philip ^a  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 54349084025     PISSN: 03932729     EISSN: 17519721     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03932720601160336     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Ahrend, R. And W. Tompson. Realising the Oil Supply Potential of the CIS. The Impact of Institutions and Policies. OECD Economics Department working paper no. 484. Paris: OECD, 2006.
2. Anderson, J. H. And C. W. Grey. Anticorruption in Transition 3. Who is Succeeding and Why? Washington, DC: World Bank, 2006.
3. EBRD (European Bank for Reconstruction and Development), Transition Report 2005. London: EBRD, 2005.
4. Gazprom, 2006 Godovoi otchet (Annual Report). http://www.gazprom.ru/documents/Annual_Report_Rus_2005.pdf.
5. Hanson, P. “Observations on the Costs of the Yukos Affair to Russia”. Eurasian Geography and Economics, Vol XLVI, no. 7 (2005): 481-95.
6. Hanson, P. And E. Teague. “Big Business and the State in Russia”. Europe-Asia Studies, 57, no. 5 (July 2005): 657-80.
7. OECD. Economic Survey, Russian Federation 2006. Paris: OECD, 2006.
8. Oxford Analytica Daily Brief. “Europe/Russia: EADS may need to accept Russian capital”. 25 September 2006.
9. Oxford Analytica Daily Brief. “RUSSIA: Strategic deposits law will boost state power”. 13 July 2006.