Twenty years of single center experience in ESWL 1987-2007: An evaluation of 3079 patients

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 22, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 2211-2222

  Tailly, Geert G ^a   Baert, Joost A ^a   Hente, K Robert ^a   Tailly, Thomas O ^a  

^a AZ KLINA ^*  (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; EVALUATION RESEARCH; EXPERIENCE; EXTRACORPOREAL LITHOTRIPSY; HUMAN; MACHINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETREATMENT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; UROLITHIASIS;

ANALGESICS; HUMANS; LITHOTRIPSY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETERAL CALCULI;

EID: 54249170561     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2008.9706     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (47)

1. Chaussy C., Brendel W., Schmiedt E. Extracoporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves. Lancet 2, 1980:1265.
2. Chaussy C., Schmiedt E., Jocham D., Schüller J., Brandl H., Liedl B. Extracoporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for treatment of urolithiasis. Urology 23, 1984:59.
3. Brendel W. History of shock-wave treatment of renal concrements. In: Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for renal stone disease. Technical and Clinical Aspects. (Editors: J.S. Gravenstein, K. Peter). Butterworths, 1986:5.
4. Tailly G. Spark gap lithotripters requiring only analgesia. In: Controversies in Endourology (Editor: Arthur D. Smith). W.B. Saunders Company, 1995:79.
5. What makes a shock wave efficient in lithotrispy. Granz B, Köhler G. J Stone Dis 1992;4:123-6.
6. Rassweiler J., Köhrmann K.U., Jünemann K.P., Alken P. Use of electromagnetic technology. In: Controversies in Endourology. (Editor: Arthur D. Smith). W.B. Saunders Company, 1995:95.
7. In situ ESWL of ureteral stones: Comparison of an electrohydraulic and an electromagnetic SW-source.Geert G. Tailly. Journal of Endourology, Vol. 16, No. 4, May 2002, 209-213.
8. Is Pre-Schock Wave Lithotripsy Stenting Necessary for Ureteral Stones With Moderate or Severe Hydronephrosis? Ahmed El-Assmy, Ahmed R. El-Nahas and Khaled Z. Sheir. From the Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt. The Journal of Urology®, Vol. 176, 2059-2062, November 2006.
9. Are obstructing ureteral stones more difficult to treat with extracorporeal electromagnetic shock wave lithotripsy? Kirkali, Z., Esen, A.A., Celebi, I. and Guler, C. J Endourol, 7:277, 1993.
10. Impact of power index, hydroureteronephrosis, stone size, and composition on the efficacy of in situ boosted ESWL for primary proximal ureteral calculi. Singh, I., Gupta, N.P., Hemal, A.K., Dogra, P.N., Ansari, M.S., Seth, A. et al. Urology, 58:16,2001.
11. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for solitary distal ureteral stones: does the degree of urinary obstruction affect success? Demirbas, M., Kose, A.C., Samli, M. Guler, C., Kara, T. and Karalar M. J Endourol, 18: 237, 2004.
12. Rapid Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Treatment after a First Colic Episode Correlates with Accelerated Ureteral Stone Clearance. Christian Seitz, Harun Fajkovië, Mesut Remzi, Matthias Waldert, Mehmet Özsoy, Gero Kramer, Michael Marberger. European Urology 49 (2006), 1099-1106.
13. Prospective randomized evaluation of emergency extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) on the short-time outcome of symptomatic ureteral stones. Tombal B, Mawlawi H, Feyaerts A, et al.Eur Urol 2005;47:855-859.
14. Emergency extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for acute renal colic caused by upper urinary tract stones. Kravchick S. Bunkin I, Stepno E, et al. J Endourol 2005;19:1-4.
15. Rapid Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Treatment after a First Colic Episode Correlates with Accelerated Ureteral Stone Clearance. Christian Seitz, Harun Fajkovië, Mesut Remzi, Matthias Waldert, Mehmet Özsoy, Gero Kramer, Michael Marberger. Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria. European Urology 49 (2006), 1099-1106.
16. Patient Controlled Analgesia during ESWL-treatments. Geert G. Tailly. Journal of Endourology, Vol. 15, No. 5, June 2001, 465-471.
17. Does a Slower Treatment Rate Impact the Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Solitary Kidney or Ureteral Stones? Job Chacko, Michael Moore, Noel Sankey and Paramjit S. Chandhoke. Departments of Surgery and Medicine, University of Colorado Sciences and Kidney Stone Center of the Rocky Mountains, Denver, Colorado.
18. Denstedt J.D., Clayman R.V., Preminger G.M. Efficiency Quotient as a means of comparing lithotripters. (Abstract). J. Endourol. (Suppl.), 1990:S100.
19. Jens J. Rassweiler, Geert G. Tailly, Christian Chaussy. Progress in Lithotriptor Technology. EAU Update Series 3 (2005) 17-36.
20. Al-Ansari A, As-Sadiq K, Al-Said S, Younis N, Jaleel OA, Shokeir AA. Prognostic factors of success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in the treatment of renal stones. Int Urol Nephrol. 2006;38(1):63-7.
21. Sorensen CM, Chandhoke PS. Is lower pole caliceal anatomy predictive of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success for primary lower pole kidney stones? J Urol. 2002 Dec;168(6):2377-82.
22. Sozen S, Kupeli B, Acar C, Gurocak S, Karaoglan U, Bozkirili I. Significance of Lower Pole Pelvicaliceal Anatomy for Stone Clearance after Shockwave Lithotripsy in Non-Obstructive Isolated Renal Pelvic Stones. J Endourol. 2008 Mar 25.
23. Ozgür Tan M, Irkilata L, Sen I, Onaran M, Küpeli B, Karaog[ACCENT]lan U, Bozkirli I. The impact of radiological anatomy in clearance of lower caliceal stones after shock wave lithotripsy. Urol Res. 2007 Jun;35(3):143-7.
24. Ghoneim IA, Ziada AM, Elkatib SE. Predictive factors of lower calyceal stone clearance after Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy (ESWL): a focus on the infundibulopelvic anatomy. Eur Urol. 2005 Aug;48(2):296-302.
25. Fong YK, Peh SO, Ho SH, Ng FC, Quek PL, Ng KK. Lower pole ratio: a new and accurate predictor of lower pole stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy? Int J Urol. 2004 Sep;11(9):700-3.
26. Sampaio FJ. Renal collecting system anatomy: its possible role in the effectiveness of renal stone treatment. Curr Opin Urol. 2001 Jul;11(4):359-66. Review.
27. Sumino Y, Mimata H, Tasaki Y, Ohno H, Hoshino T, Nomura T, Nomura Y. Predictors of lower pole renal stone clearance after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol. 2002 Oct;168(4 Pt 1):1344-7.
28. Talas H, Kilic O, Tangal S, Safak M. Does lower-pole caliceal anatomy predict stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy for primary lower-pole nephrolithiasis? Urol Int. 2007;79(2):129-32.
29. Leykamm L, Tiselius HG. Observations on intrarenal geometry of the lower-caliceal system in relation to clearance of stone fragments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. J Endourol. 2007 Apr;21(4):386-92.
30. Shock Wave Physics for Urologists.Achim Loske, Ph. D.ISBN 978-970-32-4377-8.
31. Frick J; Köhle R., Kunit G. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for large stones. News (Dornier user letter) 4:21, 1998.
32. Petterson B., Tiselius H.G. One year follow-up of an unselected group of renal stone formers treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J. Endourol. 3, 1989, 19.
33. Lingeman J.E., Smith L.H., Woods J.R., et al., eds. Bioeffects and long-term effects of ESWL. In: Urinary Calculi: ESWL, Endourology, and Medical Therapy. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1989, 285.
34. Cass A.S. Equivalence of mobile and fixed lithotriptors for upper tract stones. J. Urol. 146:290, 1991.
35. Politis G., Griffith D.P.:ESWL:Stone-free efficacy based upon stone size and location. World J. Urol 5:255, 1987.
36. Cole R.S., Shuttleworth, K.E.D. Is Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy suitable treatment for Lower Ureteric Stones ? British journal of Urology, 62:525, 1988.
37. Tiselius H.G., Petterson B., Andersson A.:Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy of stones in the Mid Ureter. The Journal of Urology, 141, 1989.
38. Selli C., Carini M.:Treatment of lower ureteral calculi with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. The Journal of Urology, 140, 1988.
39. Danuser J., Ackermann D.K., Marth D.C., Studer U.E., Zingg E.J. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in situ or after push-up for upper ureteral calculi: A prospective randomized trial. The Journal of Urology, 150;824, 1993.
40. Erturk E., Herrmann E., Cockett T.H. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for distal ureteral stones. The Journal of Urology, 149, 1425, 1993.
41. Cass, S. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for distal ureteral stones. The Journal of Urology, 119, 1495, 1992.
42. Kishimoto T., Yamamoto K., Sugimoto T., Sugimura K., Nakatani T., Wada S., Ikemoto S., Iimori M., Senju M., Kanazawa T., Maekawa M. Two years clinical experience with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and transurethral ureterolithotripsy for ureteral stones at Osaka City University Hospital. Eur Urol 16:343,1989.
43. Tailly G.G. Experience with a Dornier HM4 lithotriptor in urinary stone treatment. In Lingeman J.E., Newman D.M. (eds): Shockwave lithotripsy, 1st ed. New York, Plenum Press, 1989:421.
44. Tailly G.G. Experience with the Dornier HM4 and MPL9000 lithotriptors in urinary stone treatment. J. Urol. 144, 622:1990.
45. Tailly G.G. Preliminary experience with the Dornier lithotriptor Compact. News (Dornier user letter) 8:1993.
46. Tailly G.G. Consecutive experience with 4 Dornier lithotripters: HM4, MPL9000,Compact, and U/50. J. Endourol., Vol 13, No 5, 1999: 329.
47. Tailly G.G. In situ ESWL of ureteral stones: Comparison between an electrohydraulic and a new electromagnetic shockwave source (EMSE F-150 P). Poster presentation at the 18th World Congress on Endourology and SWL, September 14-17, 2000, São Paulo, Brazil.