메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 201-212

Enhancing ex post impact assessment of agricultural research: The CGIAR experience

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 54249167588     PISSN: 09582029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/095820208X331711     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (15)

References (48)
  • 4
    • 54249110987 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Balzer, G and U Nagel 2001 Logframe based impact monitoring within the CGIAR system. In The Future of Impact Assessment in the CGIAR: Needs Constraints and Options. Proceedings of a workshop organized by the SPIA/TAC, 3-5 May 2000. Rome, Italy: FAO.
    • Balzer, G and U Nagel 2001 Logframe based impact monitoring within the CGIAR system. In The Future of Impact Assessment in the CGIAR: Needs Constraints and Options. Proceedings of a workshop organized by the SPIA/TAC, 3-5 May 2000. Rome, Italy: FAO.
  • 6
    • 54249129829 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • World's poor pay price as crop research is cut
    • 15 May
    • Bradsher, K and A Martin 2008 World's poor pay price as crop research is cut. New York Times, 15 May 2008.
    • (2008) New York Times
    • Bradsher, K.1    Martin, A.2
  • 7
    • 0010366423 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • CGIAR Secretariat, Washington, DC: World Bank
    • CGIAR Secretariat 1996 CGIAR 1995 Financial Report. Washington, DC: World Bank.
    • (1996) CGIAR 1995 Financial Report
  • 8
    • 54249092105 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • CGIAR Secretariat, Washington, DC: World Bank
    • CGIAR Secretariat 2006 CGIAR 2006 Financial Report. Washington, DC: World Bank.
    • (2006) CGIAR 2006 Financial Report
  • 10
    • 54249091643 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Cooksy, L 1997a CGIAR Methodological Review and Synthesis of Existing Ex Post Impact Assessments. Report #1: A Review of Documents Reporting Effects of International Agricultural Research Centres. CGIAR IAEG publication.
    • Cooksy, L 1997a CGIAR Methodological Review and Synthesis of Existing Ex Post Impact Assessments. Report #1: A Review of Documents Reporting Effects of International Agricultural Research Centres. CGIAR IAEG publication.
  • 11
    • 54249094239 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Cooksy, L 1997b CGIAR Methodological Review and Synthesis of Existing Ex Post Impact Assessments. Report #2: Analysis of Comprehensive Ex Post Studies of Impact of International Agricultural Research Centres. CGIAR IAEG publication.
    • Cooksy, L 1997b CGIAR Methodological Review and Synthesis of Existing Ex Post Impact Assessments. Report #2: Analysis of Comprehensive Ex Post Studies of Impact of International Agricultural Research Centres. CGIAR IAEG publication.
  • 12
    • 54249155133 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • DAC, Development Assistance Community 2002 Glossary of key terms in evaluation and results based management. July. OECD.
    • DAC, Development Assistance Community 2002 Glossary of key terms in evaluation and results based management. July. OECD.
  • 13
    • 0142059796 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Why impact analysis should not be used for research evaluation and what the alternatives are
    • Ekboir, J 2003 Why impact analysis should not be used for research evaluation and what the alternatives are. Agricultural Systems, 78(2),166-184.
    • (2003) Agricultural Systems , vol.78 , Issue.2 , pp. 166-184
    • Ekboir, J.1
  • 16
    • 54249162986 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • An Assessment of the Impact of Agricultural Research in South Asia since the Green Revolution
    • forthcoming, CGIAR Science Council Secretariat. Rome, Italy: FAO
    • Hazell, P forthcoming An Assessment of the Impact of Agricultural Research in South Asia since the Green Revolution. A study commissioned by the SC Standing Panel of Impact Assessment. CGIAR Science Council Secretariat. Rome, Italy: FAO.
    • A study commissioned by the SC Standing Panel of Impact Assessment
    • Hazell, P.1
  • 17
    • 0142027757 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Using evaluation to enhance institutional learning and change: Recent experiences with agricultural research and development
    • Horton, D and R Mackay 2003 Using evaluation to enhance institutional learning and change: recent experiences with agricultural research and development. Agricultural Systems, 78(2), 127-142.
    • (2003) Agricultural Systems , vol.78 , Issue.2 , pp. 127-142
    • Horton, D.1    Mackay, R.2
  • 18
    • 0003904610 scopus 로고
    • Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation, 2nd edn
    • Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation 1994 The Program Evaluation Standards, 2nd edn.
    • (1994) The Program Evaluation Standards
  • 21
    • 0142027754 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Expanding the use of impact assessment and evaluation in agricultural research and development
    • MacKay, R and D Horton 2003 Expanding the use of impact assessment and evaluation in agricultural research and development. Agricultural Systems, 78(2), 143-165.
    • (2003) Agricultural Systems , vol.78 , Issue.2 , pp. 143-165
    • MacKay, R.1    Horton, D.2
  • 23
    • 54249141776 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Maredia, M and D Raitzer 2006 CGIAR and NARS partner research in sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence of impact to date. Report commissioned by the Science Council's Standing Panel on Impact Assessment. Rome, Italy: Science Council Secretariat.
    • Maredia, M and D Raitzer 2006 CGIAR and NARS partner research in sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence of impact to date. Report commissioned by the Science Council's Standing Panel on Impact Assessment. Rome, Italy: Science Council Secretariat.
  • 24
    • 54249170587 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Ex post evaluation of economic impacts of agricultural research programs: A tour of good practice
    • Rome, Italy: CGIAR Technical Advisory Committee Secretariat, FAO
    • Maredia, M, D Byerlee and J R Anderson 2000 Ex post evaluation of economic impacts of agricultural research programs: a tour of good practice. In The Future of Impact Assessment in the CGIAR: Needs, Constraints and Options. Rome, Italy: CGIAR Technical Advisory Committee Secretariat, FAO.
    • (2000) The Future of Impact Assessment in the CGIAR: Needs, Constraints and Options
    • Maredia, M.1    Byerlee, D.2    Anderson, J.R.3
  • 25
  • 32
    • 37449005573 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Benefit-cost meta-analysis of investment in the International Agricultural Research Centers of the CGIAR
    • Raitzer D and T Kelley 2008 Benefit-cost meta-analysis of investment in the International Agricultural Research Centers of the CGIAR. Agricultural Systems, 96, 108-123.
    • (2008) Agricultural Systems , vol.96 , pp. 108-123
    • Raitzer, D.1    Kelley, T.2
  • 33
    • 39649112603 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • State of the art in impact assessment of policy-oriented international agricultural research
    • Raitzer D and J Ryan 2008 State of the art in impact assessment of policy-oriented international agricultural research. Evidence and Policy, 4(1), 5-30.
    • (2008) Evidence and Policy , vol.4 , Issue.1 , pp. 5-30
    • Raitzer, D.1    Ryan, J.2
  • 37
    • 54249152834 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Evaluation and Impact of Training in the CGIAR
    • Science Council
    • Science Council 2006b Evaluation and Impact of Training in the CGIAR. Report commissioned by the CGIAR Science Council.
    • (2006) Report commissioned by the CGIAR Science Council
  • 38
    • 54249099164 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Science Council Impact Assessment of Policy-Oriented Research in the CGIAR:, Rome, Italy: Science Council Secretariat
    • Science Council 2006c Impact Assessment of Policy-Oriented Research in the CGIAR: a Scoping Study Report. Rome, Italy: Science Council Secretariat.
    • (2006) a Scoping Study Report
  • 42
    • 54249110374 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Future of Impact Assessment in the CGIAR: Needs Constraints and Options
    • TAC Secretariat, 3-5 May, Rome, Italy: FAO
    • TAC Secretariat 2001. The Future of Impact Assessment in the CGIAR: Needs Constraints and Options. Proceedings of a workshop organized by the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment of the TAC, 3-5 May 2000. Rome, Italy: FAO.
    • (2000) Proceedings of a workshop organized by the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment of the TAC
  • 43
    • 54249091198 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Evaluation of the Impact of Integrated Pest Management Research at the International Agricultural Research Centres
    • Rome, Italy: FAO
    • Waibel, H 2000 Evaluation of the Impact of Integrated Pest Management Research at the International Agricultural Research Centres. TAC Secretariat. Rome, Italy: FAO.
    • (2000) TAC Secretariat
    • Waibel, H.1
  • 44
    • 54249123230 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Waibel, H and D Zilberman D 2007 The Impact of Natural Resource Management Research: Studies from the CGIAR. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
    • Waibel, H and D Zilberman D 2007 The Impact of Natural Resource Management Research: Studies from the CGIAR. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
  • 46
    • 54249110986 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Impacts of Agricultural Research and Development: Why Has Impact Assessment Research Not Made More of a Difference
    • San Jose, Costa Rica. Mexico: CIMMYT
    • Watson, D J 2003 Impacts of Agricultural Research and Development: Why Has Impact Assessment Research Not Made More of a Difference. Proceedings of a conference organized by the SPIA and CIMMYT, held 4-7 February 2002 in San Jose, Costa Rica. Mexico: CIMMYT.
    • (2002) Proceedings of a conference organized by the SPIA and CIMMYT, held 4-7 February
    • Watson, D.J.1
  • 48
    • 54249107290 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • World Bank 2007 NONIE: Impact Evaluation Guidance. Mimeo. 〈http://www.worldbank.org/ieg/nonie/docs/NONIEGuidanceIntroduction. doc〉, last accessed 15 May 2008.
    • World Bank 2007 NONIE: Impact Evaluation Guidance. Mimeo. 〈http://www.worldbank.org/ieg/nonie/docs/NONIEGuidanceIntroduction. doc〉, last accessed 15 May 2008.


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.