Federalism revised: The promise and challenge of the No Child Left Behind Act

Public Administration Review

Volumn 68, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2008, Pages

  Wong, Kenneth K ^a  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 54249159682     PISSN: 00333352     EISSN: 15406210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00987.x     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Center on Innovation and Improvement. 2006a. Report on Restructuring. Presentation to the Institute for School Improvement and Education Options. September 25-26.
2. Center on Innovation and Improvement. 2006b. Report on Supplemental Educational Services. Presentation to the Institute for School Improvement and Education Options. September 25-26.
3. Christman, Jolly, Eva Gold, and B. B. Herold. 2006. Privatization "Philly Style": What Can Be Learned from Philadelphia's Diverse Provider Model of School Management? Updated ed. Philadelphia : Research for Action.
4. DeBray, Elizabeth H. 2006. Politics, Ideology, and Education: Federal Policy during the Clinton and Bush Administrations. New York : Teachers College Press.
5. Dillon, Sam. 2005. Education Law Is Loosened for Failing Chicago Schools. New York Times, September 2.
6. Education Commission of the States. 2003. A Report on State Progress in No Child Left Behind. accessed January 2003 accessed August 10, 2008 Marcus A. Winters. 2006. Getting Ahead by Staying Behind. Education Next 6 (2). http://www.hoover.org/publications/ednext/3210586.html accessed August 8, 2008 Michael J. Petrilli. 2006. No Child Left Behind Primer. New York : Peter Lang.
7. Hochschild, Jennifer. 2003. Rethinking Accountability Practices. In No Child Left Behind? The Politics and Practice of School Accountability, edited by Paul E. Peterson and Martin R. West, chap. 5. Washington, DC : Brookings Institution Press.
8. Janofsky, Michael. 2005. Judge Rejects Challenge to Bush Education Law. New York Times, November 24.
9. Jennings, John F. 1998. Why National Standards and Tests? Politics and the Quest for Better Schools. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications.
10. Jupp, Brad. 2006. The Implications of Denver's ProComp for the Future of Collective Bargaining in the Education Sector. Paper presented at the Conference on "A New Dialogue: Collective Bargaining in Public Education, " Newport, RI, December 10-11.
11. Kim, James S., and Gail L. Sunderman. 2005. Measuring Academic Proficiency under the No Child Left Behind Act: Implications for Educational Equity. Educational Researcher 34 (8 3 13.
12. Lowi, Theodore J. 1964. American Business, Public Policy, Case-Studies, and Political Theory. World Politics 16 (4 677 715.
13. Manna, Paul. 2006. School's In: Federalism and the National Education Agenda. Washington, DC : Georgetown University Press.
14. McGuinn, Patrick. 2005. The National Schoolmarm: No Child Left Behind and the New Educational Federalism. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 35 (1 41 68.
15. McGuinn, Patrick. 2006. No Child Left Behind and the Transformation of Federal Education Policy, 1965-2005. Lawrence : University Press of Kansas.
16. Mintrop, Heinrich. 2004. Schools on Probation: How Accountability Works (and Doesn't Work). New York : Teachers College Press.
17. Mintrop, Heinrich, and Tina Trujillo. 2005. Corrective Action in Low Performing Schools: Lessons for NCLB Implementation from First-Generation Accountability Systems. Education Policy Analysis 13 (48). http://epaa.asu.edu/ epaa/v13n48/v13n48.pdf accessed August 8, 2008 Rabe, and Kenneth K. Wong. 1986. When Federalism Works. Washington, DC : Brookings Institution Press.
18. Pressman, Jeffrey L., and Aaron Wildavsky. 1973. Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in Oakland. Berkeley : University of California Press.
19. Public Agenda. 2006. http://www.publicagenda.org/educators accessed August 8, 2008 accessed August 8, 2008 Gail L., and Gary Orfield. 2006. Domesticating a Revolution: No Child Left Behind and State Administrative Response. Harvard Educational Review 76 (4 526 56.
20. Sunderman, Gail L., James S. Kim, and Gary Orfield. 2005. NCLB Meets School Realities: Lessons from the Field. Thousand Oaks, CA : Corwin Press.
21. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. 2004. Digest of Education Statistics, 2004. http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/ accessed August 10, 2008 accessed August 10, 2008 accessed August 10, 2008 Gail L. Sunderman. 2007. Education Accountability as a Presidential Priority: No Child Left Behind and the Bush Presidency. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 37 (3 333 50.
22. Wong, Kenneth K., and Anna Nicotera. 2007. Successful Schools and Educational Accountability: Concepts and Skills to Meet Leadership Challenges. Boston : Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
23. Wong, Kenneth K., and David Wishnick. 2007. Expanding the Possibilities: The Diverse-Provider Model in Large Urban School Districts. In City Schools, edited by Robert Rothman, chap. 5. Cambridge : Harvard Education Press.