Feasibility of self-propelling nasojejunal feeding tube in patients with acute pancreatitis

Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 622-624

  Joubert, Corinne ^a   Tiengou, Laurent Eric ^a   Hourmand Ollivier, Isabelle ^a   Dao, Manh Thông ^a   Piquet, Marie Astrid ^a  

^a CAEN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Acute pancreatitis; Feeding tube; Nasojejunal

Indexed keywords

METOCLOPRAMIDE;

ACUTE PANCREATITIS; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL FEEDING; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDING APPARATUS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NOSE FEEDING; PARENTERAL NUTRITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STOMACH MOTILITY;

ACUTE DISEASE; ENTERAL NUTRITION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL MOTILITY; HUMANS; INTUBATION, GASTROINTESTINAL; MALE; METOCLOPRAMIDE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATITIS; PANCREATITIS, ACUTE NECROTIZING; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 54249156014     PISSN: 01486071     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0148607108322396     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Marik PE, Zaloga GP Meta-analysis of parenteral nutrition versus enteral nutrition in patients with acute pancreatitis. BMJ. 2004 ; 328: 1407-1410.
2. McClave SA, Ritchie CS Artificial nutrition in pancreatic disease: what lessons have we learned from the literature ? Clin Nutr. 2000 ; 19: 1-6.
3. Windsor AC, Kanwar S., Li AG, et al. Compared with parenteral nutrition, enteral feeding attenuates the acute phase response and improves disease severity in acute pancreatitis. Gut. 1998 ; 42: 431-435.
4. Eatock FC, Chong P., Menezes N., et al. A randomized study of early nasogastric versus nasojejunal feeding in severe acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 ; 100: 432-439.
5. Kumar A., Singh N., Prakash S., Saraya A., Joshi YK Early enteral nutrition in severe acute pancreatitis: a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing nasojejunal and nasogastric routes. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006 ; 40: 431-434.
6. McClave SA, Greene LM, Snider HL, et al. Comparison of the safety of early enteral vs parenteral nutrition in mild acute pancreatitis. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1997 ; 21: 14-20.
7. Jeppsson B., Tranberg KG, Bengmark S. Technical developments. A new self-propelling nasoenteric feeding tube. Clin Nutr. 1992 ; 11: 373-375.
8. Berger MM, Bollmann MD, Revelly JP, et al. Progression rate of self-propelled feeding tubes in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2002 ; 28: 1768-1774.
9. Karsenti D., Viguier J., Bourlier P., et al. Enteral nutrition during acute pancreatitis: feasibility study of a self-propelling spiral distal end jejunal tube. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2003 ; 27: 614-617.
10. Meier R., Ockenga J., Pertkiewicz M., Pap A., Milinic N., Macfie J. ; German Society for Nutritional Medicine, Löser C, Keim V; European Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. ESPEN guidelines on enteral nutrition: pancreas. Clin Nutr. 2006 ; 25: 275-284.