Assessment of dural arteriovenous fistulas of the cavernous sinuses on 3D dynamic MR angiography

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Volumn 29, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 1652-1657

  Akiba, Hidenari ^a   Tamakawa, M ^a   Hyodoh, H ^a   Hyodoh, K ^a   Yama, N ^a   Nonaka, T ^a   Minamida, Y ^a   Hashimoto, M ^a   Hareyama, M ^a  

^a SAPPORO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATION; CAVERNOUS SINUS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CAVERNOUS SINUS; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM VASCULAR MALFORMATIONS; CEREBRAL ANGIOGRAPHY; CEREBRAL VEINS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 54249125081     PISSN: 01956108     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1187     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Barrow DL, Spector RH, Braun IF, et al. Classification and treatment of spontaneous carotid-cavernous sinus fistulas. J Neurosurg 1985;62:248-56
2. Halbach VV, Higashida RT, Hieshima GB, et al. Dural fistulas involving the cavernous sinus: results of treatment in 30 patients. Radiology 1987;163:437-42
3. Chen YW, Jeng JS, Liu HM, et al. Carotid and transcranial color-coded duplex sonography in different types of carotid-cavernous fistula. Stroke 2000;31:701-06
4. Kurata A, Takano M, Tokiwa K, et al. Spontaneous carotid cavernous fistula presenting only with cranial nerve palsies. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1993;14:1097-101
5. Stiebel-Kalish H, Setton A, Nimii Y, et al. Cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous malformations: patterns of venous drainage are related to clinical signs and symptoms. Ophthalmology 2002;109:1685-91
6. Wu HC, Ro LS, Chen CJ, et al. Isolated ocular motor nerve palsy in dural carotid-cavernous sinus fistula. Eur J Neurol 2006;13:1221-25
7. Hirabuki N, Miura T, Mitomo M, et al. MR imaging of dural arteriovenous malformations with ocular signs. Neuroradiology 1988;30:390-94
8. Chen JC, Tsuruda JS, Halbach VV. Suspected dural arteriovenous fistula: results with screening MR angiography in seven patients. Radiology 1992;183:265-71
9. Komiyama M, Fu Y, Yagura H, et al. MR imaging of dural AV fistulas at the cavernous sinus. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1990;14:397-401
10. Hirai T, Korogi Y, Hamatake S, et al. Three-dimensional FISP imaging in the evaluation of carotid cavernous fistula: comparison with contrast-enhanced CT and spin-echo MR. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:253-59
11. Ouanounou S, Tomsick TA, Heitsman C, et al. Cavernous sinus and inferior petrosal sinus flow signal on three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:1476-81
12. Paksoy Y, Genc BO, Genc E. Retrograde flow in the left inferior petrosal sinus and blood steal of the cavernous sinus associated with central vein stenosis: MR angiographic findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1364-68
13. Sakamoto M, Taoka T, Iwasaki S, et al. Paradoxical parasellar high signals resembling shunt diseases on routine 3D time-of-flight MR angiography of the brain: mechanism for the signals and differential diagnosis from shunt diseases. Magn Reson Imaging 2004;22:1289-93
14. Tsuchiya K, Katase S, Yoshino A, et al. MR digital subtraction angiography of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:707-11
15. Aoki S, Yoshikawa T, Hori M, et al. MR digital subtraction angiography for the assessment of cranial arteriovenous malformations and fistulas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:451-53
16. Griffiths PD, Hoggard N, Warren DJ, et al. Brain arteriovenous malformations: assessment with dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1892-99
17. Coley SC, Romanowski CA, Hodgson TJ, et al. Dural arteriovenous fistulae: noninvasive diagnosis with dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:404-07
18. Mori H, Aoki S, Okubo T, et al. Two-dimensional thick-slice MR digital subtraction angiography in the assessment of small to medium-size intracranial arteriovenous malformations. Neuroradiology 2003;45:27-33. Epub 2003 Jul 19
19. Farb RI, McGregor C, Kim JK, et al. Intracranial arteriovenous malformations: real-time auto-triggered elliptic centric-ordered 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography-initial assessment. Radiology 2001;220:244-51
20. Gauvrit JY, Oppenheim C, Nataf F, et al. Three-dimensional dynamic magnetic resonance angiography for the evaluation of radiosurgically treated cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Eur Radiol 2006;16:583-91
21. Bonneville JF, Cattin F, Racle A, et al. Dynamic CT of the laterosellar extradural venous spaces. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1989;10:535-42
22. Milburn JM, Moran CJ, Cross DT 3rd, et al. Effect of intraarterial papaverine on cerebral circulation time. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:1081-85
23. Kim JK, Farb RI, Wright GA. Test bolus examination in the carotid artery at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 1998;206:283-89
24. Borden JA, Wu JK, Shucart WA. A proposed classification for spinal and cranial dural arteriovenous fistulous malformations and implications for treatment. J Neurosurg 1995;82:166-79
25. Metz CE, Herman BA, Shen JH. Maximum likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously-distributed data. Stat Med 1998;17:1033-53
26. Obuchowski NA. Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology. Radiology 2003;229:3-08
27. Kundel HL, Polansky M. Measurement of observer agreement. Radiology 2003;228:303-08
28. Takahashi S, Tomura N, Watarai J, et al. Dural arteriovenous fistula of the cavernous sinus with venous congestion of the brain stem: report of two cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:886-88