Accurate and interpretable computational modeling of chemical mutagenicity

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 48, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 1833-1839

  Langham, James J ^a   Jain, Ajay N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMISTRY;

AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED; CHEMICAL TOXICITY; CLASSIFICATION MODELS; COMPUTATIONAL MODEL; CROSS VALIDATION; ENSEMBLE METHODS; MOLECULAR FEATURE; MOLECULAR PROPERTIES;

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING;

MUTAGENIC AGENT;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FACTUAL DATABASE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES, FACTUAL; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; MUTAGENS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 54249123263     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci800094a     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Crum Brown, A.; Fraser, T. On the Connection Between Chemical Constitution and Physiologic Action. Part 1. On the Physiological Action of Salts of the Ammonium Bases, Derived from Strychnia, Brucia, Thebia, Codeia, Morphia and Nicotia. Trans. R. Soc. Edinburgh 1868, 25, 151-203.
2. Kramer, J. A.; Sagartz, J. E.; Morris, D. L. The Application of Discovery Toxicology and Pathology Towards the Design of Safer Pharmaceutical Lead Candidates. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2007, 6, 636-649.
3. Carhart, R. E.; Smith, D. H.; Venkataraghavan, R. Atom Pairs as Molecular Features in Structure-Activity Studies: Definition and Applications. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1985, 25, 64-73.
4. Friedman, J. H.; Popescu, B. E. Predictive Learning via Rule Ensembles; Technical Report; Department of Statistics, Stanford University: 2005.
5. Cortes, C.; Vapnik, V. Support-Vector Networks. Machine Learning 1995, 20, 273-297.
6. Guha, R.; Howard, M. T.; Hutchison, G. R.; Murray-Rust, P.; Rzepa, H.; Steinbeck, C.; Wegner, J.; Willighagen, E. L. The Blue Obelisk-Interoperability in Chemical Informatics. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46, 991-998.
7. Open Babel Package, version 2.1.1; 2007.
8. Aronov, A. M.; Goldman, B. B. A Model for Identifying HERG K+ channel Blockers. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2004, 12, 2307-2315.
9. Langham, J. J. Discovering Drug Candidates in Virtual Chemical Libraries: A Novel Graph-Based Method for Virtual Screening, Ph.D. Thesis, University of California Santa Cruz: CA, 2006.
10. Hastie, T.; Tibshirani, R.; Friedman, J. Boosting and Additive Trees. In The Elements of Statistical Learning. Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction; Springer, 2001; pp 299-346.
11. Friedman, J. H.; Popescu, B. E. Gradient Directed Regularization for Linear Regression and Classification; Technical Report; Department of Statistics, Stanford University: 2004.
12. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing version 2.5.1; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2007.
13. Höcker, A.; Speckmayer, P.; Stelzer, J.; Tegenfeldt, F.; Voss H.; Voss, K. TMVA Toolkit for Multivariate Data Analysis with ROOT; 2007, http://tmva.sourceforge.net/.
14. Chang, C.-C.; Lin, C.-J. UBSVM: A Library for Support Vector Machines version 2.85; 2007, http://www.csie.nm.edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvm.
15. Venables, W.; Ripley, B. Classification. In Modern Applied Statistics with S, 4th ed.; Springen 2002; pp 331-352.
16. Sing, T.; Sander, O.; Beerenwinkel, N.; Lengauer, T. ROCR: Visualizing Classifier Performance in R. Bioinformatics 2005, 21, 3940-3941.
17. Helma, C. Lazy Structure-Activity Relationships (Lazar) for the Prediction of Rodent Carcinogenicity and Salmonella Mutagenicity. Mol. Diversity 2006, 10, 147-158.
18. Kazius, J.; McGuire, R.; Bursi, R. Derivation and Validation of Toxicophores for Mutagenicity Prediction. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 312-320.
19. Gold, L. S.; Stone, T. H.; Manley, N. B.; Garfinkel, G. B.; Hudes, E S.; Rohrbach, L.; Ames, B. N. The Carcinogenic Potency Database: Analyses of 4000 Chronic Animal Cancer Experiments Published in the General Literature and by the U.S. National Cancer Institute/National Toxicology Program. Environ. Health Perspect. 1991, 96, 11-15.
20. Richard, A. M.; Williams, C. R. Distributed Structure-Searchable Toxicity (DSSTox) Public Database Network: A Proposal. Mutat. Res. 2002, 499, 27-52.
21. Richard, A. M.; Gold, L. S.; Nicklaus, M. C. Chemical Structure Indexing of Toxicity Data on the Internet: Moving Toward a Flat World. Curr. Opin. Drug Discovery Devel. 2006, 9, 314-325.
22. Stein, S. E.; Heller, S. R.; Tchekhovskoi, D. Proceedings of the 2003 International Chemical Information Conference (Nimes), 2003; pp 131-143.
23. Cleves, A. E.; Jain, A. N. Robust Ligand-Based Modeling of the Biological Targets of Known Drugs. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 2921-2938.
24. Irwin, J. J.; Shoichet, B. K. ZINC-A Free Database of Commercially Available Compounds for Virtual Screening. J. Chem. Inf. Model 2005, 45177-182 (accessed Feb 19, 2008).
25. Triballeau, N.; Acher, F.; Brabet, I.; Pin, J.-P.; Bertrand, H.-O. Virtual Screening Workflow Development Guided by the "Receiver Operating Characteristic" Curve Approach. Application to High-Throughput docking on Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Subtype 4. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 2534-2547.
26. Fawcett, T. ROC Graphs: Notes and Practical Considerations for Data Mining Researchers; Technical Report; Hewlett-Packard Company: 2003.
27. Wishart, D. S.; Knox, C.; Guo, A. C.; Shrivastava, S.; Hassanali, M.; Stothard, P.; Chang, Z.; Woolsey, J. DrugBank: A Comprehensive Resource for in Silico Drug Discovery and Exploration. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, D668-D672.
28. Wishart, D. S.; Knox, C.; Guo, A. C.; Cheng, D.; Shrivastava, S.; Tzur, D.; Gautam, B.; Hassanali, M. DrugBank: A Knowledgebase for Drugs, Drug Actions and Drug Targets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36, D901-D906.