Intergovernmental grants

Handbook of Public Sector Economics

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 271-322

  Gamkhar, Shama ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 54149114799     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315093185-12     Document Type: Chapter

References (27)

1. Bailey S.J. and Connolly S. The flypaper effect: Identifying areas for further research. Public Choice 95: 335-361, 1998.
2. Bradford D.P. and Oates W.E. The analysis of revenue sharing in a new approach to collective fiscal decisions. Quarterly Journal of Economics 85: 416-439, 1971.
3. Borcherding T.E. and Deacon R.T. The demand for the services of nonfederal governments. American Economic Review 62: 891-901, 1972.
4. Dye R.F. and McGuire T.J. Block grants and the sensitivity of revenues to recession. Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Conference on Taxation. Washington, D.C.: National Tax Association, 1997, pp 17-24.
5. Evans W., Murray S., and Schwab R. Towards increased centralization in public school finance. In Fisher R., Ed. Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations. London: Kluwer Academic, 1997, pp 139-172.
6. Fisher R. State and Local Public Finance. 2nd ed. Chicago: Irwin, 1996, pp. 202-233.
7. Gamkhar S. Is the response of state and local highway spending symmetric to increases and decreases in federal highway grants? Public Finance Review 28(1): 3-25, 2000.
8. Gamkhar S. Federal Intergovernmental Grants and the States: Managing Devolution. Canterbury, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2002.
9. Gamkhar S. and Sim S.C. The impact of alcohol and drug abuse block grant on state and local government substance abuse expenditure: The role of federal oversight. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 26(6): 45-73, 2001.
10. Gamkhar S. and Oates W.E. Asymmetries in the response to increases and decreases in intergovernmental grants: Some empirical findings. National Tax Journal 49: 501-512, 1996.
11. Gramlich E.M. Intergovernmental grants: A review of empirical literature. In Oates W.E., Ed. The Political Economy of Fiscal Federalism. Lexington, MA: Heath Lexington, 1977.
12. Gramlich E.M. Federalism and federal deficit reduction. National Tax Journal 40: 299-313, 1987.
13. Goodspeed T.J. The relationship between state income taxes and local property taxes: Education finance in New Jersey. National Tax Journal 51: 219-238, 1998.
14. Hamilton B.W. Zoning and property taxation in a system of local governments. Urban Studies 12: 205-211, 1975.
15. Hines J.R., Jr. and Thaler R.H. The flypaper effect. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9(4): 212-226, 1995.
16. Inman R.P. and Rubinfeld D.L. Rethinking federalism. Journal of Economic Perspectives 11(4): 43-64, 1997.
17. Jacobsen K. and McGuire T.G. Federal block grants and state spending: The alcohol, drug abuse and mental health block grant and state agency behavior. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 21 (4): 753-770, 1996.
18. Jenny N.W. and Nathan R.P. Sizing up the shortfalls: The states in straits. Government Finance Review 19(2): 10-15, 2003.
19. Kenyon D.A. How strong are state revenue systems? In Sawincky M., Ed. Consequences of Federal Devolution for the Nation. New York: ME Sharpe Inc., 1999, pp 77-94.
20. Miranda R.A. and Pincur R.D. CFO as budget magician: Fiscal illusion and public finance. Government Finance Review 19: 28-36, 2003. New York Times Correspondent, The New York Times. May 8, 2003.
21. Oates W.E. Fiscal structure in a federal system. In Aronson R., Ed. Management Policies in Local Government Finance. Forthcoming. Washington, D.C.: International City/County Management Association. Oates W.E. Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1972.
22. Peterson G.E., Borvjerg R.R., Davis B.A., Davis W.A., Durman E.C., and Gullo T.A. The Reagan Block Grants: What Have We Learned? Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute Press, 1986.
23. Stine W.F. Is local government revenue response to federal aid symmetrical? Evidence from Pennsylvania county governments in an era of retrenchment. National Tax Journal 47: 799-816, 1994.
24. U.S. General Accounting Office. Federal Grants — Design Improvements Could Help Federal Resources Go Further. GAO/AIMD-97-7. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Printing Press, 1996.
25. Volden C. Asymmetric effects of intergovernmental grants: Analysis and implications for welfare policy. Publius: The Journal of Federalism. 29(3): 51-73, 1999.
26. Wilde J.A. Grant-in-aid: The analytics of design and response. National Tax Journal 24(2): 144-155, 1971.
27. Washington Post Correspondent. Helping the states. The Washington Post. May 12, 2003.