A GIS-based system for allocating municipal solid waste incinerator compensatory fund

Waste Management

Volumn 28, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 2690-2701

  Chiueh, Pei Te ^a,b   Lo, Shang Lien ^a,c   Chang, Chia Ling ^a,d  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b TUNGNAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^d FENG CHIA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIR POLLUTION; AIR QUALITY; DECISION THEORY; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INSULATING MATERIALS; MATERIALS SCIENCE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; REFUSE INCINERATORS; SOLID WASTES; WASTE INCINERATION;

AIR POLLUTANTS; ANALYTIC HIERARCHIES; COMPENSATION SCHEMES; HIGH IMPACTS; HOSTING; IMPACT FACTORS; MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE INCINERATORS; MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTES; OPERATING PERIODS; SPATIAL ANALYSES; SPATIAL SCALES;

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT;

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; FINANCIAL PROVISION; GIS; INCINERATION; MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE;

AIR POLLUTANT; AIR QUALITY; ARTICLE; COMPENSATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM; INCINERATION; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; METHODOLOGY; MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESIDENTIAL HOME; TAIWAN; WASTE GAS MANAGEMENT;

CITIES; ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANTS; FINANCING, GOVERNMENT; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INCINERATION; TAIWAN;

ASIA; EURASIA; FAR EAST; TAIPEI; TAIWAN;

EID: 54149114746     PISSN: 0956053X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.01.006     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Brent A.C., Rogers D.E.C., Ramabitsa-Siimane T.S.M., and Rohwer M.B. Application of the analytical hierarchy process to establish health care waste management systems that minimise infection risks in developing countries. European Journal of Operational Research 181 1 (2007) 403-424
2. Chang, N.B., Chang, Y.H., 2000. Assessing the redistribution strategy of the compensatory fund based on an integrated AHP and EIA approach for a municipal incinerator. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Solid Waste Management, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC, pp. 175-190.
3. Dai J., and Rocke D.M. A GIS-based approach to spatial allocation of area source solvent emissions. Environmental Modeling and Software 15 (2000) 293-302
4. ESRI, 1990. Environmental System Research Institute, Inc., Understanding GIS, the ARC/INFO method.
5. Ho W. Integrated analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research (2007) 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.01.00
6. Hsu S.H. NIMBY opposition and solid waste incinerator siting in democratizing Taiwan. The Social Science Journal 43 (2006) 453-459
7. Kontos T.D., Komilis D.P., and Halvadakis C.P. Siting MSW landfills with a spatial multiple criteria analysis methodology. Waste Management 25 (2005) 818-832
8. Ma J., Scott N.R., DeGloria S.D., and Lembo A.J. Siting analysis of farm-based centralized anaerobic digester systems for distributed generation using GIS. Biomass and Bio-energy 28 (2005) 591-600
9. Minehart D., and Zvika N. Effective siting of waste treatment facilities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 43 (2002) 303-324
10. Morselli L., Bartoli M., Brusori B., and Passarini F. Application of an integrated environmental monitoring system to an incineration plant. The Science of the Total Environ 289 1-3 (2002) 177-188
11. Morselli L., Bartoli M., Bertacchini M., Brighetti A., Luzi J., Passarini F., and Masoni P. Tools for evaluation of impact associated with MSW incineration: LCA and integrated environmental monitoring system. Waste Management 25 (2005) 191-196
12. Ramanathan R., and Ganesh L.S. Group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: an evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving members' weightages. Europe Journal of Operational Research 79 (1994) 249-265
13. Ramanathan R. A note on the use of the analytic hierarchy process for environmental impact assessment. Journal of Environmental Management 63 (2001) 27-35
14. Satty T.L. The analytic hierarchy process: planning. Priority Setting and Resource Allocation (1980), McGraw-Hill, New York, USA
15. Sharholy, M., Ahmad, K., Vaishya, R.C., Gupta, R.D., 2006. Municipal solid waste characteristics and management in Allahabad, India. Waste Management. Doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2006.03.0 01.
16. SoundPLAN, 2005. LLC Braunstein + Berndt GmbH, Tutorial SoundPLAN, Backnang, Germany. Available from: .
17. Taiwan, EPA, 1999. Guidelines For Providing Compensatory Fund For Municipal Refuse Incinerator Operation, Taipei, Taiwan. Available from: .
18. TDEP, 2003. Department of Environmental Protection, Taipei City Government, Developing Environmental Impact Model for Municipal Solid Waste Incinerators in Taipei City, Final Report, Taipei, Taiwan.
19. USEPA, 2005. User's Guide for the Industrial Source Complex (ISC3) Dispersion Models. Available from: .
20. Vaidya O.S., and Kumar S. Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications. Europe Journal of Operational Research 169 (2006) 1-29
21. Valberg P.A., Drivas P.J., McCarthy S., and Watson A.Y. Evaluating the health impacts of incinerator emissions. Journal of Hazardous Materials 47 1-3 (1996) 205-227