Does the central bottleneck encompass voluntary selection of hedonically based choices?

Experimental Psychology

Volumn 55, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 313-321

  Pashler, Harold ^a   Harris, Christine R ^a   Nuechterlein, Keith H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Attentional bottlenecks; Decision making; Iowa Gambling Task; Multitasking; Psychological refractory period

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; ATTENTIONAL BOTTLENECKS; COLOR; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; IOWA GAMBLING TASK; MOTIVATION; MULTITASKING; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

ATTENTIONAL BOTTLENECKS; DECISION MAKING; IOWA GAMBLING TASK; MULTITASKING; PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COLOR; HUMANS; MOTIVATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REFRACTORY PERIOD, PSYCHOLOGICAL;

EID: 54149111771     PISSN: 16183169     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169.55.5.313     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bechara, A., Damasio, A.R., Damasio, H., & Anderson, S.W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50, 7-15.
2. Busemeyer, J., & Stout, J.C. (2002). A contribution of cognitive decision models to clinical assessment: Decomposing performance on the Bechara gambling task. Psychological Assessment, 14, 253-262.
3. Byrne, M., & Anderson, J. (2001). Serial modules in parallel: The psychological refractory period and perfect time-sharing. Psychological Review, 108, 847-869.
4. Carrier, M., & Pashler, H. (1995). Attentional limits in memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 21, 1339-1348.
5. Duckworth, K.L., Bargh, J.A., Garcia, M., & Chaiken, S. (2002). The automatic evaluation of novel stimuli. Psychological Science, 13, 513-519.
6. Dux, P.E., Ivanoff, J., Asplund, C.L., & Marois, R. (2006). Isolation of a central bottleneck of information processing with time-resolved fMRI. Neuron, 52, 1-12.
7. Fagot, C., & Pashler, H. (1992). Making two responses to a single object: Implications for the central attentional bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1058-1079.
8. Jiang, Y., & Kanwisher, N. (2003). Common neural substrates for response selection across modalities and mapping paradigms. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 1080-1094.
9. Jolicoeur, P., Dell'Acqua, R., & Crebolder, J. (2001). The attentional blink bottleneck. In K.L. Shapiro (Ed.), The limits of attention (pp. 82-99). New York: Oxford University Press.
10. Kornblum, S. (1969). Sequential determinants of information processing in serial and discrete choice reaction time. Psychological Review, 76, 113-131.
11. Levy, J., Pashler, H., & Boer, E. (2006). Central interference in driving: Is there any stopping the psychological refractory period? Psychological Science, 17, 228-235.
12. Lien, M.C., Ruthruff, E., & Johnston, J.C. (2006). Attentional limitarions in doing two things at once: The search for exceptions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 89-93.
13. Manes, F., Sahakian, B., Clark, L., Rogers, R., Antoun, N., Aitken, M., & Robbins, T. (2002). Decision-making processes following damage to the prefrontal cortex, Brain, 125, 624-639.
14. McCann, R., & Johnston, J.C. (1992). Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 471-485.
15. McLeod, P. (1977). Parallel processing and the psychological refractory period. Acta Psychologica, 41, 381-391.
16. Oriet, C., & Jolicoeur, P. (2003). Absence of perceptual processing during reconfiguration of task-set. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 1036-1049.
17. Pashler, H. (1984). Processing stages in overlapping tasks: Evidence for a central bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 358-377.
18. Pashler, H., & Baylis, G. (1991). Procedural learning: 2. Interrrial repetition effects in speeded choice tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 33-48.
19. Pashler, H., & Johnston, J. (1989). Chronometric evidence for central postponement in temporally overlapping tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41 A, 19-45.
20. Pashler, H., & Johnston, J.C. (1998). Attentional limitations in dual-task performance. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 155-189). Hove, UK: Psychology Press/Erlbaum.
21. Pratt, J. (1964). Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica, 32, 122-136.
22. Ruthruff, E., Johnston, J.C., & Van Seist, M. V. (2001). Why practice reduces dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 3-21.
23. Ruthruff, E., van Selst, M., Johnston, J.C., & Remington, R. (2006). How does practice reduce dual-task interference: Integration, automatization, or just stage-shortening? Psychological Research, 70, 125-142.
24. Schubert, T., & Szameitat, A.J. (2003). Functional neuroanatomy of interference in overlapping dual tasks: An fMRI study. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 733-746.
25. Szameitat, AJ., Schubert, T., Müller, K., & von Cramon, D.Y. (2002). Localization of executive functions in dual-task performance with fMRI. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 1184-1199.
26. Tombu, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (2003). A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 3-18.
27. Van Selst, M.V., Ruthruff, E., & Johnston, J.C. (1999). Can practice eliminate the psychological refractory period effect? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1268-1283.
28. Welford, A.T. (1967). Single-channel operation in the brain. Acta Psychologica, 27, 5-22.