Hospital-acquired infections after caesarean delivery in selected hospitals in the southern Poland;Zakażenia po operacjach ciecia cesarskiego u pacjentek szpitali Polski południowej

Ginekologia Polska

Volumn 79, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 536-543

  Wójkowska Mach, Jadwiga ^a   Batyeki, Ryszard ^b   Hulbéj, Danuta ^b   Bulanda, Małgorzata ^a   Rózańska, Anna ^a   Heczko, Piotr B ^a  

^a JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL COLLEGE   (Poland)

^b Wojewoódzki Szpital ^*  (Poland)

Author keywords

Caesarean section; Surveillance; Wound infection

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CROSS INFECTION; DELIVERY ROOM; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFECTION CONTROL; MATERNAL WELFARE; MICROBIOLOGY; MULTICENTER STUDY; NEWBORN; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; POLAND; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREGNANCY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICS; SURGICAL INFECTION;

ADULT; CESAREAN SECTION; CROSS INFECTION; DELIVERY ROOMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFECTION CONTROL; MATERNAL WELFARE; POLAND; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREGNANCY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGICAL WOUND INFECTION;

EID: 54149106314     PISSN: 00170011     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Liu S, Heaman M, Joseph K, [et al.]. Risk of maternal postpartum readmission associated with mode of delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2005, 105, 836-842.
2. Hamilton B, Martin J, Ventura S, [et al.]. Births: preliminary data for 2004. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2005, 54, 1-17.
3. Husslein P. Elective caesarean section versus vaginal delivery. Whither the end of traditional obstetrics? Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2001, 265 169-174.
4. Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt V, Martin D. Association between method of delivery and maternal rehospitalization. JAMA. 2000, 283, 2411-241.
5. Glazener C, Abdalla M, Stroud P, [et al.]. Postnatal maternal morbidity: extent, causes, prevention and treatment. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995, 102, 282-287.
6. McGovern P, Dowd B, Gjerdingen D, [et al.]. Postpartum health of employed mothers 5 weeks after childbirth. Ann Fam Med. 2006, 4, 159-167.
7. Yokoe D, Christiansen C, Johnson R. Epidemiology of and surveillance for post-partum infections. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001, 7, 837-841.
8. Ledger W. Puerperal endometritis. W: Bennet JV, Brachman PS: Hospital infections. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1998, 551-561.
9. Datar A, Sood N. Impact of postpartum hospital-stay legislation on newborn length of stay, readmission, and mortality in California. Pediatrics. 2006, 118, 63-72.
10. Borkowski W, Mielniczuk H. Długość pobytu w szpitalu kobiet po porodzie. Przegl Epidemiol. 2006, 60, 163-170.
11. Horan T, Gaynes R. Surveillance of nosocomial infection. In: Mayhall C: Hospital epidemiology and infection control. 3th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2004, 1660-1702.
12. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Twelfth Informational Supplement. 2002, Vol. 22, 50-55.
13. Culver D, Horan T, Gaynes R. Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Am J Med. 1991, 91, suppl 3B, 152S-157S.
14. Haley R, Culver D, Morgan W, [et al.]. Identifying patients at high risk of surgical wound infection; A simple multivariate index of patient susceptibility and wound contamination. Am J Epidemiol. 1985, 121, 206-215.
15. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004. Am J Infect Control. 2004, 32, 470-485.
16. Barwolff S, Sohr D, Geffers C, [et al.]. Reduction of surgical site infections after Caesarean delivery using surveillance. J Hosp Infect. 2006, 64, 156-161.
17. Geubbels E, Mintjes-de Groot A, van den Berg J, [et al.]. An operating surveillance system of surgical-site infections in The Netherlands: results of the PREZIES national surveillance network. Preventie van Ziekenhuisinfecties door Surveillance. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2000, 21, 311-318.
18. Scottish Surveillance of Healthcare Associated Infection Programme (SSHAIP). Surveillance of surgical site infection: for procedures carried out from 1/04/02-30/06/04. 2004 (cytowany: 14.01.2008). Dostepny w Internecie: www.documents.hps.scot.nhs.uk/hai/sshaip/publications/ssi/ ssi-2004.pdf
19. Leigh D, Emmanuel F, Sedgwick J, [et al.]. Post-operative urinary tract infection and wound infection in women undergoing caesarean section: a comparison of two study periods in 1985 and 1987. J Hosp Infect. 1990, 15, 107-116.
20. Killian C, Graffunder E, Vinciguerra T, [et al.]. Risk factors for surgical-site infections following cesarean section. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2001, 22, 613-617.
21. Vincent-Bouletreau A, Caillat-Vallet E, Dumas A, [et al.]. Changing medical practices and nosocomial infection rates in French maternity units from 1997 to 2000. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. (Paris). 2005, 34, 128-136..
22. Balkhy H, Memish Z, Almuneef M. Effect of intensive surveillance on cesarean-section wound infection rate in a Saudi Arabian hospital. Am J Infect Control. 2003, 31, 288-290.
23. Barbut F, Carbonne B, Truchot F, [et al.]. Surgical site infections after cesarean section: results of a five-year prospective surveillance. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. (Paris). 2004, 33, 487-496.
24. Evaldson G, Frederici H, Jullig C, [et al.]. Hospital-associated infections in obstetrics and gynecology. Effects of surveillance. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1992, 71, 54-58.
25. Creedy D, Noy D. Post discharge surveillance after cesarean section. Birth. 2001, 28, 264-269.
26. Couto R, Pedrosa T, Nogueira J, [et al.]. Post-discharge surveillance and infection rates in obstetric patients. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1998, 61, 227-231.
27. Medina-Cuadros M, Sillero-Arenas M, Martinez-Gallego G, [et al.]. Surgical wound infections diagnosed after discharge from hospital: Epidemiologic differences with inhospital infections. Am J Infect Control. 1996, 24, 421-428.
28. Hagglund L, Christensen K, Christensen P, [et al.]. Reduced rate of postoperative infections in emergency cesarean section after two doses of cefuroxim perioperatively. A placebo-controlled study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1989, 68, 201-204.
29. Parrott T, Evans A, Lowes A, [et al.]. Infection following caesarean section. J Hosp Infect. 199, 13, 349-354.
30. Henderson E, Love E. Incidence of hospital-acquired infections associated with caesarean section. J Hosp Infect. 1995, 29, 245-255.
31. Bagratee J, Moodley J, Kleinschmidt I, [et al.]. A randomized controlled trial of antibiotic prophylaxis in elective caesarean delivery. Br J Obstet Gyneacol. 2001, 108, 143-148.
32. Chang E, Soper D. Surgical-site infections after obstetric and gynecologic surgery. Semin Infect Control. 2002, 2, 94-101.
33. Paszkowski T. Okołooperacyjna profilaktyka antybiotykowa w połżnictwie i ginekologii. Ginekol Pol. 2007, 78, 916-921.
34. Polskie Towarzystwo Ginekologiczne. Wstepne propozycje do Rekomendacji Polskiego Towarzystwa Ginekologicznego dotyczacych ciecia cesarskiego. Ginekol Pol. 2008, 79, 224-232.
35. Karowicz-Bilińska A, Kuś, Kazimiera W, [i wsp.]. Ocena obecności zakażeń Chlamydia trachomatis oraz ocena flory bakteryjnej u kobiet cieżarnych w II i III trymestrze ciaży. Ginekol Pol. 2007, 78, 787-791.
36. Kazimiera W, Świerczewski A, Kowalska-Koperek U, [i wsp.]. Analiza biocenozy kanału szyjki macicy u cieżarnych. Ginekol Pol. 2007, 78, 214-217.
37. Seremak-Mrozikiewicz A, Drews K, Nowocień G, [i wsp.]. Otyłość cieżarnych jako problem w położnictwie. Ginekol Pol. 2007, 78, 234-238.