Connections of activated hopping processes with the breakdown of the Stokes-Einstein relation and with aspects of dynamical heterogeneities

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 78, Issue 4, 2008, Pages

  Chong, Song Ho ^a  

^a INSTITUTE FOR MOLECULAR SCIENCE   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY; FORECASTING; GLASS; GLASS FORMING MACHINES; IONIC CONDUCTION; LIQUIDS; MARKOV PROCESSES; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS;

BARRIER HEIGHTS; COUPLING THEORIES; CROSS-OVER; DISTRIBUTION OF PARTICLES; DYNAMIC LENGTH SCALES; DYNAMICAL HETEROGENEITIES; DYNAMICAL THEORIES; EINSTEIN RELATIONS; EXPERIMENTAL DATUM; EXTENDED VERSIONS; FRAGILE GLASSES; HOPPING PROCESSES; HOPPING RATES; JUMP PROCESSES; LENNARD-JONES; NON-GAUSSIAN; NONERGODIC TRANSITIONS; PEAK STRUCTURES; SIMULATION RESULTS;

GLASS TRANSITION;

EID: 54149103490     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.78.041501     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. I. Chang and H. Sillescu, J. Phys. Chem. B JPCBFK 1089-5647 10.1021/jp9640989 101, 8794 (1997).
2. S. F. Swallen, P. A. Bonvallet, R. J. McMahon, and M. D. Ediger, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.015901 90, 015901 (2003).
3. M. K. Mapes, S. F. Swallen, and M. D. Ediger, J. Phys. Chem. B JPCBFK 1089-5647 10.1021/jp0555955 110, 507 (2006).
4. M. D. Ediger, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. ARPLAP 0066-426X 10.1146/annurev.physchem.51.1.99 51, 99 (2000).
5. X. Xia and P. G. Wolynes, J. Phys. Chem. B JPCBFK 1089-5647 10.1021/jp004616m 105, 6570 (2001).
6. L. Berthier, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.020201 69, 020201 (R) (2004).
7. Y. J. Jung, J. P. Garrahan, and D. Chandler, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.061205 69, 061205 (2004).
8. E. Rössler, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. BBPCAX 0005-9021 94, 392 (1990).
9. M. Goldstein, J. Chem. Phys. JCPSA6 0021-9606 10.1063/1.1672587 51, 3728 (1969).
10. W. Götze, in Liquids, Freezing and Glass Transition, edited by, J.-P. Hansen, D. Levesque, and, J. Zinn-Justin, (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1991), p. 287.
11. W. Götze and L. Sjögren, Rep. Prog. Phys. RPPHAG 0034-4885 10.1088/0034-4885/55/3/001 55, 241 (1992).
12. W. Götze, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter JCOMEL 0953-8984 10.1088/0953-8984/11/10A/002 11, A1 (1999).
13. W. Götze and L. Sjögren, Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter ZPCMDN 0722-3277 10.1007/BF01303763 65, 415 (1987).
14. K. Kawasaki, Physica A PHYADX 0378-4371 10.1016/0378-4371(94)90533-9 208, 35 (1994).
15. K. S. Schweizer and E. J. Saltzman, J. Chem. Phys. JCPSA6 0021-9606 10.1063/1.1578632 119, 1181 (2003);
16. K. S. Schweizer, Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. COCSFL 1359-0294 10.1016/j.cocis.2007.07.013 12, 297 (2007), and references cited therein.
17. S. M. Bhattacharyya, B. Bagchi, and P. G. Wolynes, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.72.031509 72, 031509 (2005).
18. C. P. Flynn, Phys. Rev. PHRVAO 0031-899X 10.1103/PhysRev.171.682 171, 682 (1968);
19. C. P. Flynn, Point Defects and Diffusion (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1972).
20. V. Zöllmer, K. Rätzke, F. Faupel, and A. Meyer, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.195502 90, 195502 (2003).
21. W. Kob, C. Donati, S. J. Plimpton, P. H. Poole, and S. C. Glotzer, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.2827 79, 2827 (1997).
22. E. Flenner and G. Szamel, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.72.011205 72, 011205 (2005).
23. E. Flenner and G. Szamel, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.72.031508 72, 031508 (2005).
24. J.-P. Hansen and I. R. McDonald, Theory of Simple Liquids, 2nd ed. (Academic Press, London, 1986).
25. W. Götze and L. Sjögren, Transp. Theory Stat. Phys. TTSPB4 0041-1450 10.1080/00411459508203936 24, 801 (1995).
26. J. N. Roux, J.-L. Barrat, and J.-P. Hansen, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter JCOMEL 0953-8984 10.1088/0953-8984/1/39/028 1, 7171 (1989).
27. G. Wahnström, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.44.3752 44, 3752 (1991).
28. T. B. Schøder, S. Sastry, J. C. Dyre, and S. C. Glotzer, J. Chem. Phys. JCPSA6 0021-9606 10.1063/1.481621 112, 9834 (2000).
29. J.-L. Barrat, W. Götze, and A. Latz, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter JCOMEL 0953-8984 10.1088/0953-8984/1/39/027 1, 7163 (1989).
30. W. Götze and M. R. Mayr, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.61.587 61, 587 (2000).
31. S.-H. Chong, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.74.031205 74, 031205 (2006).
32. W. Götze and M. Sperl, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter JCOMEL 0953-8984 10.1088/0953-8984/15/11/311 15, S869 (2003).
33. M. Fuchs, W. Götze, and M. R. Mayr, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.58.3384 58, 3384 (1998).
34. Assuming s≈a/2 and x* ≈ limt→∞ δ r2 (t) evaluated within the idealized MCT at the critical point, which corresponds to the Lindemann length, one obtains Δ2 ≈0.12 for the Lennard-Jones system under study and Δ2 ≈0.10 for the hard-sphere system studied in Ref.
35. T. Franosch, M. Fuchs, W. Götze, M. R. Mayr, and A. P. Singh, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.55.7153 55, 7153 (1997).
36. F. Mezei, W. Knaak, and B. Farago, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.571 58, 571 (1987).
37. R. Yamamoto and A. Onuki, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.4915 81, 4915 (1998).
38. G. Li, W. M. Du, A. Sakai, and H. Z. Cummins, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.46.3343 46, 3343 (1992).
39. W. Kob and H. C. Andersen, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.1376 73, 1376 (1994).
40. S.-H. Chong, A. J. Moreno, F. Sciortino, and W. Kob, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.215701 94, 215701 (2005).
41. Simulation results for the product D τ q* are formed with the α -relaxation time of the tagged-particle density correlator rather than that of the coherent density correlator since the statistics is much better for the former. The ratios R from the simulations are then calculated by rescaling the product by the one at a reference temperature Tref and are plotted versus ε = C ∼ (Tc -T)/Tc with Tref =0.80, C ∼ =0.12, and Tc =0.435 for the binary mixture of Lennard-Jones particles, and with Tref =3.0, C∼=0.17, and Tc =2.10 for the binary mixture of dumbbell molecules of elongation ζ=0.8. Here C ∼ refers to the ratio CMD / CLJ, where CMD and CLJ are the constants C for the simulated systems and for our Lennard-Jones system, respectively, connecting the separation parameter σ relevant in MCT and the reduced temperature ε= (Tc -T)/Tc via σ=C ε. For the comparison shown in the inset of Fig. 2, it was necessary to rescale the reduced temperatures of the simulated systems by C to absorb difference in CMD and CLJ.
42. A. Rahman, Phys. Rev. PHRVAO 0031-899X 10.1103/PhysRev.136.A405 136, A405 (1964).
43. N. Lačević, F. W. Starr, T. B. Schøder, and S. C. Glotzer, J. Chem. Phys. JCPSA6 0021-9606 10.1063/1.1605094 119, 7372 (2003).
44. L. Berthier, D. Chandler, and J. P. Garrahan, Europhys. Lett. EULEEJ 0295-5075 10.1209/epl/i2004-10401-5 69, 320 (2005).
45. C. Donati, J. F. Douglas, W. Kob, S. J. Plimpton, P. H. Poole, and S. C. Glotzer, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.2338 80, 2338 (1998).
46. R. P. Feynman and M. Cohen, Phys. Rev. PHRVAO 0031-899X 10.1103/PhysRev.102.1189 102, 1189 (1956).
47. W. Götze and M. Lücke, Phys. Rev. B PLRBAQ 0556-2805 10.1103/PhysRevB.13.3825 13, 3825 (1976).