Effects of intelligent notification management on users and their tasks

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 93-102

  Iqbal, Shamsi T ^a   Bailey, Brian P ^a  

^a University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

Author keywords

Breakpoint; Interruption; Notification; Statistical models

Indexed keywords

HUMAN ENGINEERING; SCHEDULING;

BREAKPOINT; INTERRUPTION; MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; NOTIFICATION; NOVEL TASKS; REACTION TIME; STATISTICAL MODELS; SYSTEM USE;

IMAGE SEGMENTATION;

EID: 54149091419     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1357054.1357070     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Adamczyk, P.D. and Bailey, B.P. If Not Now When? The Effects of Interruptions at Different Moments within Task Execution. Proc. CHI 2004, 271-278.
2. Bailey, B.P., Adamczyk, P.D., Chang, T.Y. and Chilson, N.A. 2006. A Framework for Specifying and Monitoring User Tasks. Journal of Computers in Human Behavior, 22 (4): 685-708.
3. Bailey, B.P. and Konstan, J.A. 2006. On the Need for Attention Aware Systems: Measuring Effects of Interruption on Task Performance, Error Rate, and Affective State. Journal of Computers in Human Behavior, 22 (4): 709-732.
4. Begole, J.B., Matsakis, N.E. and Tang, J.C. Lilsys: Sensing Unavailability. Proc. CSCW 2004, 511-514.
5. Czerwinski, M., Cutrell, E. and Horvitz, E. Instant Messaging: Effects of Relevance and Timing. In People and Computers XIV: Proc. HCI 2000, 71-76.
6. Fogarty, J. and Hudson, S.E. Toolkit Support for Developing and Deploying Sensor-Based Statistical Models of Human Situations. Proc. CHI 2007, 135-144
7. Fogarty, J., Hudson, S.E. and Lai, J. Examining the Robustness of Sensor-Based Statistical Models of Human Interruptibility. Proc. CHI 2004, 207-214.
8. Fogarty, J., Ko, A.J., Aung, H.H., Golden, E., Tang, K.P. and Hudson, S.E. Examining Task Engagement in Sensor-Based Statistical Models of Human Interruptibility. Proc. CHI 2005, 331-340.
9. Fogarty, J., Lai, J. and Christensen, J. 2004. Presence Versus Availability: The Design and Evaluation of a Context-Aware Communication Client. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61 (3): 299-317.
10. Gluck, J., Bunt, A. and McGrenere, J. Matching Attentional Draw with Utility in Interruption. Proc. CHI 2007, 41-50.
11. Ho, J. and Intille, S.S. Using Context-Aware Computing to Reduce the Perceived Burden of Interruptions from Mobile Devices. Proc. CHI 2005, 909-918.
12. Horvitz, E. Principles of Mixed-Initiative User Interfaces. Proc. CHI 1999, 159-166.
13. Horvitz, E. and Apacible, J. Learning and Reasoning About Interruption. Proc. ICMI 2003, 20-27.
14. Horvitz, E., Apacible, J. and Subramani, M. Balancing Awareness and Interruption: Investigation of Notification Deferral Policies. Proc. User Modeling 2005, 433-437.
15. Horvitz, E., Breese, J., Heckerman, D., Hovel, D. and Rommelse, K. The Lumiere Project: Bayesian User Modeling for Inferring the Goals and Needs of Software Users. Proc. UAI 1998, 256-265.
16. Horvitz, E., Jacobs, A. and Hovel, D. Attention-Sensitive Alerting. Proc. UAI 1999, 305-313.
17. Horvitz, E., Kadie, C.M., Paek, T. and Hovel, D. 2003. Models of Attention in Computing and Communications: From Principles to Applications. CACM, 46 (3): 52-59.
18. Horvitz, E., Koch, P., Kadie, C.M. and Jacobs, A. Coordinate: Probabilistic Forecasting of Presence and Availability. Proc. UAI 2002, 224-233.
19. Hudson, S.E., Fogarty, J., Atkeson, C.G., Avrahami, D., Forlizzi, J., Kiesler, S., Lee, J.C. and Yang, J. Predicting Human Interruptibility with Sensors: A Wizard of Oz Feasibility Study. Proc. CHI 2003, 257-264.
20. Iqbal, S.T. and Bailey, B.P. Investigating the Effectiveness of Mental Workload as a Predictor of Opportune Moments for Interruption. Proc. CHI 2005, 1489-1492.
21. Iqbal, S.T. and Bailey, B.P. Leveraging Characteristics of Task Structure to Predict Costs of Interruption. Proc. CHI 2006, 741-750.
22. Iqbal, S.T. and Bailey, B.P. Understanding and Developing Models for Detecting and Differentiating Breakpoints During Interactive Tasks. Proc. CHI 2007, 697-706.
23. Iqbal, S.T. and Horvitz, E. Disruption and Recovery of Computing Tasks: Field Study, Analysis and Directions. Proc. CHI 2007, 677-686.
24. McFarlane, D.C. 2002. Comparison of Four Primary Methods for Coordinating the Interruption of People in Human-Computer Interaction. HCI, 17(1): 63-139.
25. Monk, C.A., Boehm-Davis, D.A. and Trafton, J.G. 2004. Recovering from Interruptions: Implications for Driver Distraction Research. Human Factors, 46 (4): 650-663.
26. Newtson, D. 1973. Attribution and the Unit of Perception of Ongoing Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28 (1): 28-38.
27. Zacks, J.M. and Tversky, B. 2001. Event Structure in Perception and Conception. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 3-21.