Comments: Comments by prof. French

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 93, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 766-768

  French, Simon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 54049152160     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2008.02.007     Document Type: Note

References (22)

1. Savage LJ. The foundations of statistics. New York: Dover; 1972.
2. DeGroot MH. Optimal statistical decisions. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1970.
3. De Finetti B. Theory of probability. Chichester: Wiley; 1974.
4. De Finetti B. Theory of probability. Chichester: Wiley; 1975.
5. Lad F. Operational subjective statistical methods. New York: Wiley; 1996.
6. Goldstein M. Revising previsions: a geometrical interpretation (with discussion). J R Stat Soc B 1981;43:105-30.
7. French S. Group consensus probability distributions: a critical survey. In: Bernardo JM, DeGroot MH, Lindley DV, Smith AFM, editors. Bayesian statistics 2. Amsterdam: North-Holland; 1985. p. 183-201.
8. French S, Rios Insua D. Statistical decision theory. London: Arnold; 2000.
9. Genest C, Zidek JV. Combining probability distributions: a critique and annotated bibliography. Stat Sci 1986;1:114-48.
10. McConway K. Marginalisation and linear opinion pools. J Am Stat Assoc 1981;76:410-4.
11. Lichtenstein S, Fischhoff B, Phillips LD. Calibration of probabilities: the state of the art to 1980. In: Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A, editors. Judgement under uncertainty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1982. p. 306-34.
12. Lindley DV. The Bayesian approach to statistics. In: Oliveira JT, Epstein B, editors. Some recent advances in statistics. New York: Academic Press; 1982. p. 65-87.
13. McClelland AGR, Bolger F. The calibration of subjective probabilities: theories and models 1940-94. In: Wright G, Ayton P, editors. Subjective probability. Chichester: Wiley; 1994.
14. French S. Conflict of belief: when advisers disagree. In: Bennett PG editor. Analysing conflict and its resolution: some mathematical contributions. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1987. p. 93-111.
15. Genest C, Wagner CG. Further evidence against independence preservation in expert judgement synthesis. Aequationes Math 1987;32:74-86.
16. Goossens LHJ, Kelly GN. Special: issue: expert judgement and accident consequence uncertainty analysis. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2000;90(3):293-381.
17. Wiper MW, French S. Combining experts' opinions using a normal-Wishart model. J Forecast 1995;14:25-34.
18. French S editor. Readings in decision analysis. London: Chapman and Hall; 1988.
19. Phillips LD. A theory of requisite decision models. Acta Psychol 1984;56:29-48.
20. Bennett PG, Calman KC, editors. Risk communication and public health: policy science and participation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999.
21. Fischhoff B. Risk perception and communication unplugged: twenty years of process. Risk Anal 1995;15:137-45.
22. Kuhn TS. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1970.