Commentary: Are there good reasons to adopt dynamic systems approaches for explaining deductive reasoning?

Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 219-223

  Leitão, Selma ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PERNAMBUCO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Deductive reasoning; Dynamic systems approaches; Symbolic computationalism

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; HUMAN; LOGIC; METHODOLOGY; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; NOTE; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; STANDARD; SYMBOLISM; THINKING;

COGNITION; HUMANS; LOGIC; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; RESEARCH DESIGN; SYMBOLISM; THINKING;

EID: 54049138035     PISSN: 19324502     EISSN: 19363567     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12124-008-9063-x     Document Type: Review

References (8)

1. Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2. Dreyfus, H. L. (1992). What computers still can't do: A critique of artificial reason. Massachusetts: MIT.
3. Harré, R., & Gillett, G. (1994). The discursive mind. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. M. D. Lewis 2000 The promise of dynamics systems approaches for an integrated account of human development Child Development 71 36 43
5. J. R. Searle 1980 Minds, brains and programs Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 417 424
6. Searle, J. (1984). Minds, brains, and science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
7. Searle, J. R. (1997). The mystery of consciousness. London: Granta.
8. Walton, D. N. (1996). Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.