Sequential versus simultaneous market delineation: The relevant antitrust market for salmon

Journal of Competition Law and Economics

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 893-913

  Haldrup, Niels ^a   Møllgaard, Peter ^b   Nielsen, Claus Kastberg ^c  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b Department of Innovation and Organizational Economics   (Denmark)

^c Healthcare Life Sciences   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 54049124161     PISSN: 17446414     EISSN: 17446422     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/joclec/nhn020     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Asche, F., Steen, F., When Antidumping Measures Lead to Increasing Market Power; A Case Study of the European Salmon Market (Department of Economics, Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration, Discussion Paper 27/03, 2003).
2. Bishop, S., Walker, M., THE ECONOMICS OF EC COMPETITION LAW: CONCEPTS, APPLICATION AND MEASUREMENT (London: Sweet & Maxwell 2nd ed. 2002).
3. Copenhagen Economics, The Internal Market and the Relevant Geographical Market: The Impact of the Completion of the Single Market Programme on the Definition of the Relevant Geographical Market, Enterprise Paper 15 (Brussels: EU Commission, DG Enterprise, 2003).
4. la Cour, L.F., Møllgaard, P. 2002. Market Domination: Tests Applied to the Danish Cement Industry, 14(2) EUROPEAN J.L. & ECON 99.
5. Dickey, F., Fuller, W. 1979. Distribution of Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root, 74 J. AM. STATISTICAL ASSOC. 427.
6. Engle, R.F., Granger, C.W.J. 1987. Cointegration and Error Correction: Representations, Estimation, and Testing, 55 ECONOMETRICA 252.
7. Commission, European. 1997. Commission Notice on the Definition of Relevant Market for the Purposes of Community Competition Law, Official Journal of the European Union C372/5.
8. Franses, P.H., Haldrup, N. 1994. The Effects of Additive Outliers on Tests for Unit Roots and Cointegration, 12 J. OF BUS. & ECON. STATISTICS 471.
9. Fuller, W.A. INTRODUCTION TO STATISTICAL TIME SERIES (New York: Wiley 1976).
10. Gonzalo, J. 1994. Five Alternative Methods of Estimating Long Run Equilibrium Relationships, 60 J. ECONOMETRICS 1.
11. Haldrup, N. Empirical Analysis of Price Data in the Delineation of the Relevant Geographical Market in Competition Analysis (Department of Economics, University of Aarhus, Working Paper 2003-9, 2003).
12. Hodrick, R.J., Prescott, E.C. 1997. Postwar U.S. Business Cycles: An Empirical Investigation, 29(1) J. MONEY, CREDIT, & BANKING 1.
13. Johansen, S. 1991. Estimation and Hypothesis Testing of Cointegration Vectors in Gaussian Vector Autoregressive Models, 55 ECONOMETRICA 251.
14. Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P.C.B., Schmidt, P., Shin, Y. 1992. Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationarity Against the Alternative of a Unit Root - How Sure Are We That Economic Time Series Have a Unit Root? 54 (1-3) J. ECONOMETRICS 159.
15. Landes, W.M., Posner, R.A. 1981. Market Power in Antitrust Cases, 94(5) HARV. L. REV. 522.
16. Neven, D., Nuttall, R., Seabright, P., MERGER IN DAYLIGHT: THE ECONOMICS AND POLITICS OF EUROPEAN MERGER CONTROL (London: Centre for Economic Policy Research 1993).
17. Office of Fair Trading, MARKET DEFINITION (OFT 403, 1999)
18. Posner, R.A., ANTITRUST LAW (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press 2001).
19. Stigler, G., Sherwin, R.A. 1985. The Extent ofthe Market, 28 J.L. & ECON. 555.
20. Stocking, G.W., Mueller, W.F. 1995. The Cellophane Case and the New Competition, 45(1) AM. ECON. REV. 29.
21. UK Competition Commission, Nutreco Holding NV and Hydro Seafood GSP Ltd: A Report on the Proposed Merger, (2000), available at http://www.competition-commission.org.uk/rep_pub/reports/2000/ 451nutreco.htm#full
22. Werden, G.J., Froeb, L.M. 1993. Correlation, Causality, and All that Jazz: The Inherent Shortcomings of Price Tests for Antitrust Market Delineation, 8 REV. INDUS. ORG. 329.
23. Wills, H. 2002. Market Definition: How Stationarity Tests Can Improve Accuracy, 23(1) EUR. COMPETITION L.R. 4-6.