Anterior apical biopsy: Is it useful for prostate cancer detection?

International Journal of Urology

Volumn 15, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 900-904

  Orikasa, Kazuhiko ^a   Ito, Akihiro ^a   Ishidoya, Shigeto ^a   Saito, Seiichi ^a   Endo, Mareyuki ^a   Arai, Yoichi ^a  

^a TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

12 core biopsy; Apical anterior peripheral zone; Prostate biopsy; Prostate cancer; Repeat biopsy

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; APICAL ANTERIOR PERIPHERAL ZONE BIOPSY; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CONTROL GROUP; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; TUMOR BIOPSY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;

EID: 54049120652     PISSN: 09198172     EISSN: 14422042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2008.02106.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Norberg M, Egevad L, Holmberg L, Sparen P, Norlen BJ, Busch C. The sextant protocol for ultrasound-guided core biopsies of the prostate underestimates the presence of cancer. Urology 1997 50 : 562 6.
2. Presti JC Jr., Bhargava JJ, Chang V, Shinohara K. The optimal systematic prostate biopsy scheme should include 8 rather than 6 biopsies: results of a prospective clinical trial. J. Urol. 2000 163 : 163 6 discussion R, Kabbani W, Sakr W, Gheiler EL, Pontes JE. Origin and racial distribution of glandular tissue in the anterior compartment of the prostate: an autopsy study. Prostate 1999 39 : 310 5.
3. Bott SR, Young MP, Kellett MJ, Parkinson MC. Anterior prostate cancer: is it more difficult to diagnose? BJU Int. 2002 89 : 886 9.
4. Meng MV, Franks JH, Presti JC Jr., Shinohara K. The utility of apical anterior horn biopsies in prostate cancer detection. Urol. Oncol. 2003 21 : 361 5.
5. Takashima R, Egawa S, Kuwao S, Baba S. Anterior distribution of Stage T1c nonpalpable tumors in radical prostatectomy specimens. Urology 2002 59 : 692 7.
6. Matsumoto K, Egawa S, Satoh T, Kuruma H, Yanagisawa N, Baba S. Computer simulated additional deep apical biopsy enhances cancer detection in palpably benign prostate gland. Int. J. Urol. 2006 13 : 1290 5.
7. Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Terris MK, Stamey TA. Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J. Urol. 1989 142 : 71 4. discussion 4-5.
8. Stamey TA. Making the most out of six systematic sextant biopsies. Urology 1995 45 : 2 12.
9. Crawford ED, Hirano D, Werahera PN et al. Computer modeling of prostate biopsy: tumor size and location-not clinical significance-determine cancer detection. J. Urol. 1998 159 : 1260 4.
10. Eichler K, Hempel S, Wilby J, Myers L, Bachmann LM, Kleijnen J. Diagnostic value of systematic biopsy methods in the investigation of prostate cancer: a systematic review. J. Urol. 2006 175 : 1605 12.
11. Stewart CS, Leibovich BC, Weaver AL, Lieber MM. Prostate cancer diagnosis using a saturation needle biopsy technique after previous negative sextant biopsies. J. Urol. 2001 166 : 86 91 discussion 2.
12. Chen ME, Troncoso P, Johnston DA, Tang K, Babaian RJ. Optimization of prostate biopsy strategy using computer based analysis. J. Urol. 1997 158 : 2168 75.
13. Vis AN, Boerma MO, Ciatto S, Hoedemaeker RF, Schroder FH, van der Kwast TH. Detection of prostate cancer: a comparative study of the diagnostic efficacy of sextant transrectal versus sextant transperineal biopsy. Urology 2000 56 : 617 21.
14. Emiliozzi P, Corsetti A, Tassi B, Federico G, Martini M, Pansadoro V. Best approach for prostate cancer detection: a prospective study on transperineal versus transrectal six-core prostate biopsy. Urology 2003 61 : 961 6.
15. Demura T, Hioka T, Furuno T et al. Differences in tumor core distribution between palpable and nonpalpable prostate tumors in patients diagnosed using extensive transperineal ultrasound-guided template prostate biopsy. Cancer 2005 103 : 1826 32.
16. Kawakami S, Okuno T, Yonese J et al. Optimal sampling sites for repeat prostate biopsy: a recursive partitioning analysis of three-dimensional 26-core systematic biopsy. Eur. Urol. 2007 51 : 675 83.
17. Babaian RJ, Toi A, Kamoi K et al. A comparative analysis of sextant and an extended 11-core multisite directed biopsy strategy. J. Urol. 2000 163 : 152 7.
18. Jones JS, Patel A, Schoenfield L, Rabets JC, Zippe CD, Magi-Galluzzi C. Saturation technique does not improve cancer detection as an initial prostate biopsy strategy. J. Urol. 2006 175 : 485 8.
19. Pelzer AE, Bektic J, Berger AP et al. Are transition zone biopsies still necessary to improve prostate cancer detection? Results from the tyrol screening project. Eur. Urol. 2005 48 : 916 21 discussion 21.