Comments: Comment on Cooke's classical method

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 93, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 760-765

  Clemen, Robert T ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SAFETY ENGINEERING;

COOKE'S CLASSICAL METHODS; WEIGHTING SCHEME;

PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS;

EID: 54049103767     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2008.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Cooke RM. Experts in uncertainty: opinions and subjective probability in science. New York: Oxford University Press; 1991.
2. Clemen RT, Winkler RL. Combining probability distributions from experts in risk analysis. Risk Anal 1999;19:187-203. (Pubitemid 29374646)
3. Genest C, McConway KJ. Allocating the weights in the linear opinion pool. J Forecasting 1990;9:53-73.
4. Schervish MJ. A general method for comparing probability assssors. Ann Stat 1989;17:1856-79.
5. Clemen RT. Combining forecasts: a review and annotated bibliography (with discussion). Int J Forecasting 1989;5:559-83.
6. Makridakis S, Andersen A, Carbone R, Fildes R, Hibon M, Lewandowski R, et al. The accuracy of extrapolation (time series) methods: results of a forecasting competition. J Forecasting 1982;1:111-53.
7. Makridakis S, Chatfield C, Hibon M, Lawrence M, Mills T, Ord K, et al. The M-2 competition: a real-time judgmentally based forecasting study. Int J Forecasting 1993;9:5-22.
8. Makridakis S, Hibon M. The M3-competition. Int J Forecasting 2000;16:451-76.
9. Good P. Resampling methods: a practical guide to data analysis. Boston: Birkhauser; 2005.
10. DeGroot MH, Fienberg SE. Assessing probability assessors: calibration and refinement. In: Gupta SS, Berger JO, editors. Statistical decision theory and related topics III, vol. 1. New York: Academic; 1982. p. 291-314.
11. Murphy A. Scalar and vector partitions of the probability score: Part I. Two-state situation. J Appl Meteorol 1972;11:273-82.
12. Murphy A. Scalar and vector partitions of the probability score: Part II. N-state situation. J Appl Meteorol 1972;11:1183-92.
13. Matheson JE, Winkler RL. Scoring rules for continuous probability distributions. Manage Sci 1976;22:1087-96.
14. Yates JF. Analyzing the accuracy of probability judgments for multiple events: an extension of the covariance decomposition. Org Behav Hum Decision Processes 1988;41:281-99.
15. Yates JF. Subjective probability accuracy analysis. In: Wright G, Ayton P, editors. Subjective probability. Chichester, England: Wiley; 1994. p. 381-410.
16. Lichtenstein S, Fischhoff B, Phillips D. Calibration of probabilities: the state of the art to 1980. In: Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A, editors. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1982. p. 06-334.
17. Hora SC. Probability judgments for continuous quantities: linear combinations and calibration. Manage Sci 2004;50:597-604.