Ethical models underpinning responses to threats to public health: A comparison of approaches to communicable disease control in Europe

Bioethics

Volumn 22, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 466-476

  Gainotti, Sabina ^a,b   Moran, Nicola ^f   Petrini, Carlo ^c,d   Shickle, Darren ^e  

^a ISTITUTO SUPERIORE DI SANITÀ   (Italy)

^b CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^d Pontifical University Regina Apostolorum

^e UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^f NONE

Author keywords

Europe; Infectious diseases; Public health ethics; Public health law

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; ETHICS; EUROPE; HUMAN; HUMAN RIGHTS; INFECTION CONTROL; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; LEGAL ASPECT; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PUBLIC HEALTH; REVIEW;

COMMUNICABLE DISEASE CONTROL; EUROPE; HUMAN RIGHTS; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PUBLIC HEALTH; QUARANTINE; SECURITY MEASURES;

EID: 54049099210     PISSN: 02699702     EISSN: 14678519     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00698.x     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. R. Coker R. Martin. Introduction: the Importance of Law for Public Health Policy and Practice. Public Health. 2006 Oct 120 Suppl: 2 7
2. D.W. MacPherson, B.D. Gushulak L. Macdonald. Health and Foreign Policy: Influences of Migration and Population Mobility. Bull World Health Organ 2007 85 : 200 206.
3. World Health Organization. 2007. The World Health Report: a Safer Future: Global Public Health Security in the 21st Century. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press.
4. T. Friedman. 2005. The World Is Flat. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux;
5. E.S. Michelson. 2006. Individual Freedom or Collective Welfare? An Analysis of Quarantine as a Response to Global Infectious Disease. In Ethics and Infectious Disease. M.J. Selgelid, M.P. Battin & Charles B. Smith ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing: 53-69.
6. L.O. Gostin et al. The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act: Planning for and Response to Bioterrorism and Naturally Occurring Infectious Diseases. JAMA. 2002 288 : 622 628.
7. L. Garrett. 2000. Betrayal of Trust, The Collapse of Global Public Health. New York, NY: Hyperion: 557.
8. World Health Organization. 2005. International Haelth Regulations (IHR). Available: http://who.int/csr/ihr/en [Accessed 30 Jan 2008].
9. G.J. Annas. Bioterrorism, Public Health, and Civil Liberties. New Engl J Med 2002 346 : 1337 1341.
10. New Zealand Parliament. Public Health Bill n. 177-1. Available: http://www.parliament.nz/en-NZ/PB/Legislation/Bills/c/d/3/00DBHOH_BILL8346_1- Public-Health-Bill.htm [Accessed 7 May 2008]; Department of Health, Western Australia. Public Health Bill. 2008. Draft. Available: http://www. newpublichealthact.health.wa.gov.au/consultation/docs/ACF470E.pdf [Accessed 7 May 2008].
11. L. MacLehose, M. McKee J. Weinberg. Responding to the Challenge of Communicable Disease in Europe. Science 2002 295 : 2047 2050.
12. L. MacLehose et al. Communicable Disease Outbreaks Involving More Than one Country: Systems Approach to Evaluating the Response. Br Med J 2001 323 : 861 863.
13. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Available at: http://ecdc.europa.eu/ [Accessed 30 Jan 2008].
14. A. Amato-Gauci A. Ammon. ECDC to Launch First Report on Communicable Diseases Epidemiology in the European Union. Euro Surveill 2007 12 (6 E070607.2
15. Commission Of The European Communities. 28.11.2005 Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on Strengthening Coordination on Generic Preparedness Planning For Public Health Emergencies at Eu Level. Brussels. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/com/2005/ com2005_0605en01.pdf [Accessed 30 Jan 2008].
16. S. Mounier-Jack R. Coker. How Prepared is Europe for Pandemic Influenza? Analysis of National Plans. Lancet 2006 367 (9520 1405 1411
17. S. Mounier-Jack, R. Jas R. Coker. Progress and Shortcomings in European National Strategic Plans for Pandemic Influenza. Bull World Health Organ 2007 85 (12) 923 929.
18. Mounier-Jack & Coker. Progress and Shortcomings in European National Strategic Plans for Pandemic Influenza. Bull World Health Organ 2007 85 (12) 923 929. op. cit. note 15.
19. European Public Health Ethics Network (EuroPHEN). www.europhen.net [Accessed 30 Jan 2008].
20. Coker & Martin, Progress and Shortcomings in European National Strategic Plans for Pandemic Influenza. Bull World Health Organ 2007 85 (12): op cit. note 1, p. 2.
21. C.B. Smith et al. Are There Characteristics of Infectious Diseases that Raise Special Ethical Issues? Dev World Bioeth 2004 4 : 1 16.
22. 'Isolation' refers to restrictions on the activities of a person who is known to be infected, typically at a treatment centre where they can also receive appropriate medical care for the infection.
23. 'Quarantine' refers to restrictions on the activities of a healthy person or group of people suspected of having been exposed to an infectious disease and who therefore might go on to develop it.
24. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. 2007. Public Health: Ethical Issues. London, UK: Nuffield Council on Bioethics: 51-77.
25. L.O. Gostin H. Markel. Through the Quarantine Looking Glass: Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis and Public Health Governance, Law, and Ethics. J Law Med Ethics 2007 35 : 616 628.
26. D.F. Musto. Quarantine and the Problem of AIDS. Milbank Quarterly 1986 64 Supplement 1: 97 107
27. L.O. Gostin. 2000. Public Health Law. Power, Duty, Restraint. Berkley and Los Angeles, CA. University of California Press.
28. C. Enemark. 2006. Securitizing Infectious Diseases. In Ethics and Infectious Disease. M.J. Selgelid, M.P. Battin & Charles B. Smith, eds. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing: 327-343.
29. Annas. 2006. Securitizing Infectious Diseases. In Ethics and Infectious Disease. op. cit. note 16. See also the debate which followed the Draft Model State Emergency Powers Act on the website of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons. Available at: http://www.aapsonline.org/testimony/ emerpind.htm [Accessed 7 May 2008].
30. G.J. Annas. Bioterrorism, Public Health, and Human Rights. Health Affairs 2002 21 : 94 97.
31. S. Gruskin. Is There a Government in the Cockpit: a Passenger's Perspective or Global Public Health: the Role of Human Rights. Temple Law Rev 2004 77 : 313 334.
32. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Available at: URL: http://www.unhchr.ch/html/ menu3/b/a_ccpr.htm. [Accessed 30 Jan 2008].
33. R. Upshur. The Ethics of Quarantine. Virtual Mentor 2003 5 (11)
34. Gostin, The Ethics of Quarantine. Virtual Mentor 2003 5 (11) op. cit. note 23.
35. Enemark, The Ethics of Quarantine. Virtual Mentor 2003 5 (11) op. cit. note 26.
36. A.T. Price-Smith. 2002. The Health of Nations: Infectious Disease, Environmental Change, and Their Effects on National Security and Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: 15-16.
37. M.A. Rothstein. Are Traditional Public Health Strategies Consistent with Contemporary American Values? Temple Law Rev 2004 77 : 176 177.
38. M.K. Wynia L.O. Gostin. Ethical Challenges in Preparing for Bioterrorism: Barriers within the Health Care System. Am J Public Health 2004 94 : 1098.
39. J.E. van Steenbergen A. Timen. The Control of Infectious Diseases in The Netherlands. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2005 149 : 177 81.
40. Government of Italy. Decreto Ministeriale 15 dicembre 1990 Sistema informativo delle malattie infettive e diffusive. Gazzetta Ufficiale 6 Sept 1998.
41. Government of Sweden. Smittskyddslag. 1988: 1472.
42. Government of Denmark. Lov om foranstaltninger mod smitsomme sygdomme. 1994.
43. R. Reintjes et al. Benchmarking National Surveillance Systems: a New Tool for the Comparison of Communicable Disease Surveillance and Control in Europe. Eur J Public Health 2007 17 : 375 380.
44. Amato-Gauci & Ammon. Benchmarking National Surveillance Systems: a New Tool for the Comparison of Communicable Disease Surveillance and Control in Europe. Eur J Public Health 2007 17 : 375 380. op. cit. note 20.
45. Public Health (Control of Disease)Act 1984. Section 17(1)(a), Such restrictions are also stated under Section 22(3) of the UK Civil Contingencies Act. 2004.
46. Government of Ireland. Health Act 1947. Section 44 (3).
47. The amended law also enforces the role of experts' advice in case of epidemics by the insertion of a new Chapter IVA (Secs. 26a-26d), entitled 'National coordination and guidance in the control of serious communicable diseases of high mortality and infectiousness'.
48. R.J. Coker, S. Mounier-Jack R. Martin. Public Health Law and Tuberculosis Control in Europe. Public Health 2007 121 : 266 273
49. Notification for example may be time consuming and the offer of an incentive may help doctors to accomplish the task. Incentives however, like sanctions, may have side effects on the patient's trust. For more discussion see N.E. Moran et al. 2006. Are Compulsory Immunisation and Incentives to Immunise Effective Ways to Achieve Herd Immunity in Europe? In Ethics and Infectious Disease. M. Selgelid, M.P. Battin & C.B. Smith, eds. Oxford: Blackwell: 215-231.
50. Coker & Martin. 2006. Are Compulsory Immunisation and Incentives to Immunise Effective Ways to Achieve Herd Immunity in Europe? In Ethics and Infectious Disease. op. cit. note 1.
51. R. Martin. The limits of law in the protection of public health and the role of public health ethics. Public Health 2006 120 : 71 77
52. A. Dawson. Commentary on The limits of law in the protection of public health and the role of public health ethics. Public Health 2006 120 : 78 80.