|
Volumn 18, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 2676-2677
|
Bone scintigraphy is really unnecessary for evaluation of bone metastasis?
a
KEIO UNIVERSITY
(Japan)
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
BONE METASTASIS;
BONE SCINTISCANNING;
CANCER STAGING;
DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY;
FALSE POSITIVE RESULT;
HUMAN;
IMAGE QUALITY;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
LETTER;
MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY;
OSTEOSCLEROSIS;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
ADULT;
AGED;
AGED, 80 AND OVER;
BONE NEOPLASMS;
BREAST NEOPLASMS;
ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
KIDNEY NEOPLASMS;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
NEOPLASM STAGING;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;
RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
SOFT TISSUE NEOPLASMS;
TECHNETIUM TC 99M MEDRONATE;
TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED;
TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;
WHOLE BODY IMAGING;
|
EID: 54049095220
PISSN: 09387994
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-1057-z Document Type: Letter |
Times cited : (4)
|
References (4)
|