Informed consent and studies of a quality improvement program

JAMA

Volumn 300, Issue 15, 2008, Pages 1762-

  Lemaire, François ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS EST CRÉTEIL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION PROGRAM; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; LETTER; MORTALITY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEPSIS; EUROPE; LEGAL ASPECT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; STANDARD; TREATMENT OUTCOME; CLINICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL ETHICS; RISK FACTOR;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; EUROPE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 54049093266     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.300.15.1762-a     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Ferrer R, Artigas A, Levy M, et al. Improvement of process of care and outcome after a multicenter severe sepsis educational program in Spain. JAMA. 2008;299(19):2294-2303.
2. Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S, et al. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(26):2725-2732.
3. Miller FG, Emanuel EJ. Quality-improvement research and informed consent. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(8):765-767.
4. Koski G. Tipping point, over the top, or just noncompliance as usual? Hastings Cent Rep. 2008;38(2):27-29.
5. Lynn J, Baily M, Bottrell M, et al. The ethics of using quality improvement methods in health care. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146(9):666-673.