Usefulness of a malleable penile prosthesis in patients with a spinal cord injury

International Journal of Urology

Volumn 15, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 919-923

  Kim, Young Dong ^a   Yang, Seung Ok ^a   Lee, Jeong Ki ^a   Jung, Tae Young ^a   Shim, Hong Bang ^a  

^a Seoul Veterans Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Complication; Penile prosthesis; Satisfaction; Spinal cord injuries

Indexed keywords

AMINOGLYCOSIDE ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; CEPHALOSPORIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; INTERVIEW; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PENIS PROSTHESIS; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SKIN SENSATION; SPINAL CORD INJURY; WOUND DEHISCENCE; WOUND INFECTION;

ADULT; AGED; ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PENILE PROSTHESIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SPINAL CORD INJURIES;

EID: 54049087789     PISSN: 09198172     EISSN: 14422042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2008.02115.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Ferguson KH, Cespedes RD. Prospective long-term results and quality-of-life assessment after Dura-II penile prosthesis placement. Urology 2003 61 : 437 41.
2. Kimoto Y, Sakamoto S, Fujikawa K, Tachibana T, Yamamoto N, Otani T. Up-titration of vardenafil dose from 10 mg to 20 mg improved erectile function in men with spinal cord injury. Int. J. Urol. 2006 13 : 1428 33.
3. Chiang HS, Wu CC, Wen T C. 10 years of experience with penile prosthesis implantation in Taiwanese patients. J. Urol. 2000 163 : 476 80.
4. Minervini A, Ralph DJ, Pryor JP. Outcome of penile prosthesis implantation for treating erectile dysfunction: Experience with 504 procedures. BJU Int. 2006 97 : 129 33.
5. Choi HK, Cho IR, Xin ZC. Surgical experiences with various penile prosthesis. Korean J. Urol. 1994 35 : 293 301.
6. Braun M, Wassmer G, Klotz T, Reifenrath B, Mathers M, Engelmann U. Epidemiology of erectile dysfunction: Results of the Cologne Male Survey. Int. J. Impot. Res. 2000 12 : 305 11.
7. Mak R, De Backer G, Kornitzer M, De Meyer JM. Prevalence and correlates of erectile dysfunction in a population-based study in Belgium. Eur. Urol. 2002 41 : 132 8.
8. Martin-Morales A, Sanchez-Cruz JJ, Saenz de Tejada I, Rodriguez-Vela L, Jimenez-Cruz JF, Burgos-Rodriguez R. Prevalence and independent risk factors for erectile dysfunction in Spain: Results of the Epidemiologia de la Disfunction Erectil Masculina study. J. Urol. 2001 166 : 569 74.
9. Moreira ED Jr., Abdo CH, Torres EB, Lobo CF, Fittipaldi JA. Prevalence and correlates of erectile dysfunction: Results of the Brazilian study of sexual behavior. Urology 2001 58 : 583 8.
10. Parazzini F, Menchini Fabris F, Bortolotti A et al. Frequency and determinants of erectile dysfunction in Italy. Eur. Urol. 2000 37 : 43 9.
11. Burns-Cox N, Burston A, Gingell JC. Fifteen years experience of penile prosthesis insertion. Int. J. Impot. Res. 1997 9 : 211 16.
12. Ku JH, Oh SJ, Jeon HG et al. Sexual activity in Korean male patients on clean intermittent catheterization with neurogenic bladder due to spinal cord injury. Int. J. Urol. 2006 13 : 42 6.
13. DeForge D, Blackmer J, Garritty C et al. Male erectile dysfunction following spinal cord injury: A systematic review. Spinal Cord 2006 44 : 465 73.
14. Zermann DH, Kutzenberger J, Sauerwein D, Schubert J, Loeffler U. Penile prosthetic surgery in neurologically impaired patients: Long-term follow-up. J. Urol. 2006 175 : 1041 4.
15. Choi HK, Cho IR, Xin ZC. Ten years of experience with various penile prosthesis in Korean. Yonsei Med. J. 1994 35 : 209 17.
16. Nielsen KT, Bruskewitz RC. Semi-rigid and malleable rod penile prostheses. Urol. Clin. North Am. 1989 16 : 13 23.
17. Oh DJ, Park WH, Shim HB. Long-term follow-up for penile prostheses in patients with spinal cord injury. Korean J. Urol. 1999 40 : 623 7.
18. Carson CC, Mulcahy JJ, Govier FE. Efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction outcomes of the AMS 700CX inflatable penile prosthesis: Results of a long-term multicenter study. AMS 700CX Study Group. J. Urol. 2000 164 : 376 80.
19. Yang KM, Choi HK. Analysis of survival rate and cause of revision on penile prosthesis: A single center long term follow-up study. Korean J. Urol. 2005 46 : 1186 91.
20. Buch JP, Zorn BH, Taylor RJ. Cost-benefit analysis of pharmacologic erection program (PEP) versus penile prosthesis. Urology 1991 37 : 116 18.
21. Lotan Y, Roehrborn CG, McConnell JD, Hendin BN. Factors influencing the outcomes of penile prosthesis surgery at a teaching institution. Urology 2003 62 : 918 21.
22. Cakan M, Demirel F, Karabacak O, Yalçinkaya F, Altuǧ U. Risk factors for penile prosthetic infection. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2003 35 : 209 13.
23. Light JK, Scott FB. Management of neurogenic impotence with inflatable penile prosthesis. Urology 1981 17 : 341 3.
24. Collins KP, Hackler RH. Complications of penile prostheses in the spinal cord injury population. J. Urol. 1988 140 : 984 5.
25. Rossier AB, Fam BA. Indication and results of semirigid penile prostheses in spinal cord injury patients: Long-term follow-up. J. Urol. 1984 131 : 59 62.
26. Perkash I, Kabalin JN, Lennon S, Wolfe V. Use of penile prostheses to maintain external condom catheter drainage in spinal cord injury patients. Paraplegia 1992 30 : 327 32.
27. Smith AD, Sazama R, Lange PH. Penile prosthesis: Adjunct to treatment in patients with neurogenic bladder. J. Urol. 1980 124 : 363 4.
28. Kimoto Y, Iwatsubo E. Penile prostheses for the management of the neuropathic bladder and sexual dysfunction in spinal cord injury patients: Long term followup. Paraplegia 1994 32 : 336 9.
29. Cho IR, Choi HK, Xin ZC. Patient and partner satisfaction after penile prosthesis implantation. Korean J. Androl. 1993 11 : 79 91.