Semi-quantitative assessment of right ventricular function in comparison to a 3D volumetric approach: A cardiovascular magnetic resonance study

European Radiology

Volumn 18, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 2399-2405

  Nijveldt, Robin ^a,b   Germans, Tjeerd ^a,b   McCann, Gerald P ^c   Beek, Aernout M ^a   van Rossum, Albert C ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b ROYAL NETHERLANDS ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF LEICESTER NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance; Right ventricular function; TAPSE

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; BRUGADA SYNDROME; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; CARDIOVASCULAR PARAMETERS; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEART INFARCTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE ENDDIASTOLIC VOLUME; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE ENDSYSTOLIC VOLUME; HEART RIGHT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART VOLUME; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULMONARY HYPERTENSION; QUANTITATIVE DIAGNOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; RIGHT VENTRICULAR FRACTIONAL SHORTENING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TRICUSPID ANNULAR PLANE SYSTOLIC EXCURSION;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; FEMALE; HISTORY, ANCIENT; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION, RIGHT;

EID: 54049085364     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-1017-7     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bossone E, Duong-Wagner TH, Paciocco G, Oral H, Ricciardi M, Bach DS, Rubenfire M, Armstrong WF (1999) Echocardiographic features of primary pulmonary hypertension. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 12:655-662
2. de Groote P, Millaire A, Foucher-Hossein C, Nugue O, Marchandise X, Ducloux G, Lablanche JM (1998) Right ventricular ejection fraction is an independent predictor of survival in patients with moderate heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 32:948-954
3. Zehender M, Kasper W, Kauder E, Schonthaler M, Geibel A, Olschewski M, Just H (1993) Right ventricular infarction as an independent predictor of prognosis after acute inferior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 328:981-988
4. Bleasdale RA, Frenneaux MP (2002) Prognostic importance of right ventricular dysfunction. Heart 88:323-324
5. Grothues F, Moon JC, Bellenger NG, Smith GS, Klein HU, Pennell DJ (2004) Interstudy reproducibility of right ventricular volumes, function, and mass with cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Am Heart J 147:218-223
6. Helbing WA, Bosch HG, Maliepaard C, Rebergen SA, van der Geest RJ, Hansen B, Ottenkamp J, Reiber JH, de Roos A (1995) Comparison of echocardiographic methods with magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of right ventricular function in children. Am J Cardiol 76:589-594
7. Jiang L, Siu SC, Handschumacher MD, Luis GJ, Vazquez de Prada JA, King ME, Picard MH, Weyman AE, Levine RA (1994) Three-dimensional echocardiography. In vivo validation for right ventricular volume and function. Circulation 89:2342-2350
8. Kaul S, Tei C, Hopkins JM, Shah PM (1984) Assessment of right ventricular function using two-dimensional echocardiography. Am Heart J 107:526-531
9. Nichols K, Saouaf R, Ababneh AA, Barst RJ, Rosenbaum MS, Groch MW, Shoyeb AH, Bergmann SR (2002) Validation of SPECT equilibrium radionuclide angiographic right ventricular parameters by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 9:153-160
10. Ueti OM, Camargo EE, Ueti AA, Lima-Filho EC, Nogueira EA (2002) Assessment of right ventricular function with Doppler echocardiographic indices derived from tricuspid annular motion: Comparison with radionuclide angiography. Heart 88:244-248
11. Jauhiainen T, Jarvinen VM, Hekali PE, Poutanen VP, Penttila A, Kupari M (1998) MR gradient echo volumetric analysis of human cardiac casts: focus on the right ventricle. J Comput Assist Tomogr 22:899-903
12. Pennell DJ, Sechtem UP, Higgins CB, Manning WJ, Pohost GM, Rademakers FE, van Rossum AC, Shaw LJ, Yucel EK (2004) Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): Consensus Panel report. Eur Heart J 25:1940-1965
13. Beygui F, Furber A, Delepine S, Helft G, Metzger JP, Geslin P, Le Jeune JJ (2004) Routine breath-hold gradient echo MRI-derived right ventricular mass, volumes and function: Accuracy, reproducibility and coherence study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 20:509-516
14. Grothues F, Moon JC, Bellenger NG, Smith GS, Klein HU, Pennell DJ (2004) Interstudy reproducibility of right ventricular volumes, function, and mass with cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Am Heart J 147:218-223
15. Kaul S, Tei C, Hopkins JM, Shah PM (1984) Assessment of right ventricular function using two-dimensional echocardiography. Am Heart J 107:526-531
16. Ueti OM, Camargo EE, Ueti AA, Lima-Filho EC, Nogueira EA (2002) Assessment of right ventricular function with Doppler echocardiographic indices derived from tricuspid annular motion: Comparison with radionuclide angiography. Heart 88:244-248
17. Hammarstrom E, Wranne B, Pinto FJ, Puryear J, Popp RL (1991) Tricuspid annular motion. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 4:131-139
18. Sievers B, Brandts B, Franken U, Trappe HJ (2004) Single and biplane TrueFISP cardiovascular magnetic resonance for rapid evaluation of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 6:593-600
19. Wilde AA, Antzelevitch C, Borggrefe M, Brugada J, Brugada R, Brugada P, Corrado D, Hauer RN, Kass RS, Nademanee K, Priori SG, Towbin JA (2002) Proposed diagnostic criteria for the Brugada syndrome. Eur Heart J 23:1648-1654
20. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1983) A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 148:839-843
21. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307-310
22. Kaul S, Tei C, Hopkins JM, Shah PM (1984) Assessment of right ventricular function using two-dimensional echocardiography. Am Heart J 107:526-531
23. Ueti OM, Camargo EE, Ueti AA, Lima-Filho EC, Nogueira EA (2002) Assessment of right ventricular function with Doppler echocardiographic indices derived from tricuspid annular motion: Comparison with radionuclide angiography. Heart 88:244-248
24. Kjaergaard J, Petersen CL, Kjaer A, Schaadt BK, Oh JK, Hassager C (2006) Evaluation of right ventricular volume and function by 2D and 3D echocardiography compared to MRI. Eur J Echocardiogr 7:430-438
25. Kjaergaard J, Petersen CL, Kjaer A, Schaadt BK, Oh JK, Hassager C (2006) Evaluation of right ventricular volume and function by 2D and 3D echocardiography compared to MRI. Eur J Echocardiogr 7:430-438
26. Tamborini G, Pepi M, Galli CA, Maltagliati A, Celeste F, Muratori M, Rezvanieh S, Veglia F (2006) Feasibility and accuracy of a routine echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular function. Int J Cardiol:
27. Grothues F, Moon JC, Bellenger NG, Smith GS, Klein HU, Pennell DJ (2004) Interstudy reproducibility of right ventricular volumes, function, and mass with cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Am Heart J 147:218-223
28. Kjaergaard J, Petersen CL, Kjaer A, Schaadt BK, Oh JK, Hassager C (2006) Evaluation of right ventricular volume and function by 2D and 3D echocardiography compared to MRI. Eur J Echocardiogr 7:430-438
29. Maceira AM, Prasad SK, Khan M, Pennell DJ (2006) Reference right ventricular systolic and diastolic function normalized to age, gender and body surface area from steady-state free precession cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Eur Heart J 27:2879-2888
30. Tandri H, Daya SK, Nasir K, Bomma C, Lima JA, Calkins H, Bluemke DA (2006) Normal reference values for the adult right ventricle by magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Cardiol 98:1660-1664
31. Alfakih K, Plein S, Bloomer T, Jones T, Ridgway J, Sivananthan M (2003) Comparison of right ventricular volume measurements between axial and short axis orientation using steady-state free precession magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 18:25-32