Agreement between methods

Kidney International

Volumn 74, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 1116-1120

  Van Stralen, Karlijn J ^a   Jager, Kitty J ^a,d   Zoccali, Carmine ^b   Dekker, Friedo W ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b BIANCHI MELACRINO MORELLI HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^c LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Agreement; Bland Altman plot calibration; Correlation coefficient

Indexed keywords

CREATININE; INULIN;

ARTICLE; BLAND ALTMAN PLOT; CALIBRATION; CLINICAL LABORATORY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; CREATININE CLEARANCE; GLOMERULUS FILTRATION RATE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY FUNCTION; LABORATORY TEST; MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

CREATINE; GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE; HUMANS; INULIN; METHODS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 53949117389     PISSN: 00852538     EISSN: 15231755     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ki.2008.306     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Galton F. Family likeness in stature. Proc R Soc Lond 1886; 40: 42-73.
2. Pearson K. VIII Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. III. Regression, heredity and panmixia. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A 1896; 187: 253-318.
3. Pearson K. Determination of the coefficient of correlation. Science 1909; 30: 23-25.
4. Mariat C, Alamartine E, Barthelemy JC et al. Assessing renal graft function in clinical trials: can tests predicting glomerular filtration rate substitute for a reference method? Kidney Int 2004; 65: 289-297.
5. Doolan PD, Alpen EL, Theil GB. A clinical appraisal of the plasma concentration and endogenous clearance of creatinine. Am J Med 1962; 32: 65-79.
6. Harris JA. Supplementary note on the significance of variety tests. Science 1913; 37: 493-494.
7. Tripepi G, Jager KJ, Dekker FW et al. Linear and logistic regression analysis. Kidney Int 2008; 73: 806-810.
8. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-310.
9. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999; 8: 135-160.
10. Myles PS, Cui J. Using the Bland-Altman method to measure agreement with repeated measures. Br J Anaesth 2007; 99: 309-311.
11. Bland JM, Altman DG. Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet 1995; 346: 1085-1087.