Performance Indicators a tool to Support Spatial Data Infrastructure assessment

Computers, Environment and Urban Systems

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 365-376

  Giff, Garfield A ^a   Crompvoets, Joep ^b  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Framework for PIs; Performance Indicators (PIs); SDI assessment

Indexed keywords

REENGINEERING;

ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGIES; FRAMEWORK FOR PIS; IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS; MULTI VIEWS; PERFORMANCE INDICATORS; PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (PIS); SDI ASSESSMENT; SPATIAL DATA INFRASTRUCTURES;

INVESTMENTS;

ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK; ASSESSMENT METHOD; INFRASTRUCTURE; MEASUREMENT METHOD; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; RESEARCH WORK; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SPATIAL DATA;

EID: 53949114640     PISSN: 01989715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2008.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Bickman L. The functions of program theory. In: Bickman L. (Ed). Using program theory in evaluation, new directions for program evaluation Vol. 33 (1987), Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA 5-18
2. Burby, J. (2005). Defining key performance indicators. In ClickZ experts. . Last Accessed April 2008.
3. (CDCP) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1999). Framework for program evaluation in public health. In MMWR 1999 (Vol. 48, No. RR-11).
4. Chelimsky E. The coming transformations in evaluation. In: Chelimsky E., and Shadish W.R. (Eds). Evaluation for the 21st century: A handbook (1997), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA 1-29
5. (CHN) Child Health Network for greater Toronto (2001). A performance evaluation framework for the child health network: Background discussion paper. A CHN discussion paper, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
6. (CMIIP) The Committee On Measuring Improving Infrastructure Performance. Measuring and improving infrastructure performance (1995), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
7. Coffman, J. (1999). Learning form logic models: An example of a family/school partnership program. A Harvard Family Research Project report, Harvard Family Research Project, Cambridge, MA, USA.
8. Crompvoets, J. (2006). National spatial data clearinghouses, worldwide development and impact. PhD-dissertation, Wageningen University, 128pp.
9. Crompvoets J., Bregt A., Rajabifard A., and Williamson I. Assessing the worldwide developments of national spatial data clearinghouses. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 18 7 (2004) 665-689
10. Crompvoets, J., & Grus, L. (2007). Workshop report 'Multi-view framework to assess (National) Spatial Data Infrastructures', May 2007, Wageningen, The Netherlands. . Last Accessed August 2008.
11. De Man W.H.E. Understanding SDI: Complexity and institutionalization. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 20 3 (2006) 329-343
12. Delgado Fernández, T., & Crompvoets, J. (Eds.), (2007). Infraestructuras de Datos Espaciales en Iberoamérica y el Caribe. IDICT, Habana, Cuba, 213pp. (in Spanish).
13. Delgado-Fernandez, T., Lance, K., Buck, M., & Onsrud, H. J. (2005). Assessing SDI readiness index. In Proceedings of the eighth international conference on global spatial data infrastructure, April 2005, Cairo, Egypt.
14. Deloitte & Touche (2002). National critical infrastructure evaluation criteria. A report prepared for the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection and Emergency Preparedness.
15. Environment Canada (2000). Manager's guide to implementing performance-based management. An Environment Canada report, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
16. Georgiadou Y., Rodriguez-Pabón O., and Lance K.T. SDI and e-Governance: A quest for appropriate evaluation approaches. URISA Journal: Journal of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association 18 2 (2006) 43-55
17. Giff, G. (2005). Conceptual funding models for spatial data infrastructure implementation. PhD-dissertation, University of New Brunswick.
18. Giff, G. (2006). The value of performance indicators to spatial data infrastructure development. In Proceeding of GSDI 9 conference, November 2006, Santiago, Chile.
19. Giff, G. (2008a). The application of Performance Indicators to SDI/GIS Assessment. In Proceedings of GITA conference on geospatial infrastructure solutions, Seattle, March 2008, Washington, USA.
20. Giff G. A framework for designing performance indicators for spatial data infrastructure assessment. In: Crompvoets J., Rajabifard A., Van Loenen B., and Delgado Fernández T. (Eds). A multi-view framework to assess spatial data infrastructures (2008), Melbourne University Press, Melbourne
21. Giff, G., & Coleman, D. (2005). Using simulation to evaluate funding models for SDI implementation. In Proceedings of FIG working week 2005 and GSDI-8 conference, April 2005, Cairo, Egypt.
22. Giff, G., & Lunn R. (2008). Designing performance indicators for local SDI assessment: A city of Fredericton case study. In Proceedings of GSDI 10 conference on SDI, February 2008, Port of Spain, Trinidad & Tobago.
23. Grus, L., Bregt, A., & Crompvoets, J. (2006). Report of the workshop "Exploring Spatial Data Infrastructures". January 2006, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
24. (GSA) General Services Administration Office of Government wide Policy (2000). Performance-based management: Eight steps to develop and use information technology performance measures effectively. A General Services Administration Office of Government wide Policy report, Washington, DC, USA.
25. Hale, J. (2003). Performance-based management: What every manager should do to get results. November 2003, Pfeiffer.
26. Halsing D., Bernknopf R., and Theissen K. The national map: Benefits at what cost?. Geospatial Solution (2004) February 01, 2004
27. Halsing, D., Bernknopf, R., & Theissen, K. (2004b). A cost-benefit analysis of the national map. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia, USA. . Last Accessed April 2008.
28. Innovation Network (2005). Logic model workbook, A component of innovation network's logic model and evaluation training materials. . Last Accessed June 2007.
29. Kanungo S., Duda S., and Srinivas Y. A structured model for evaluating information system effectiveness. System Research and Behavioural Science 16 (1999) 495-518
30. Kok B., and Van Loenen B. How to assess the success of National Spatial Data Infrastructures?. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 29 (2005) 699-717
31. Lance, K. (2007). SDI performance measurement as a function of budgeting processes. In Proceedings of the workshop on multi-view framework for assess national spatial data infrastructures, May 2007, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
32. Lawrence, D. (1998). Benchmarking infrastructure enterprises. In M. Arblaster, & M. Jamison (Eds.), Infrastructure regulation and market reform; principles and practice, Canberra, Australia (pp. 55-67).
33. Long L. Management information systems (1989), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
34. Masser, I. (1998). The first generation of national geographic information strategies. In Proceedings of third GSDI conference, November 1998, Canberra, Australia.
35. Masser I. All shapes and sizes: The first generation of national spatial data infrastructures. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 13 (1999) 67-84
36. Masser I. GIS worlds: Creating spatial data infrastructures (2005), ESRI Press, Redlands, CA, USA
37. McNamara, C. (1999). Performance management: Performance plan. Free Management Library. . Last Accessed April 2008.
38. (NCIAP) The National Critical Infrastructure Assurance Program (2004). Asset criteria. . Last Accessed April 2008.
39. (NPR) National Partnership for Reinventing Government (1997). Serving the American public: Best practices in customer-driven strategic planning. . Last Accessed April 2008.
40. (NRC) National Research Council. Assessment of the NASA applied sciences program (2007), National Academies Press, Washington, DC
41. OAGA (1999). OAG audit standard: The audit of performance indicators. West Perth, Australia: OAGA. . Last Accessed April 2008.
42. (OPM) Office of Public management New South Wales (1990). Health improvement/health service planning kit. New South Wales, Australia: OPM. . Last Accessed April 2008.
43. Patton M. A context and boundaries for theory-driven approach to validity. Evaluation and Program Planning 12 (1989) 375-377
44. Paull, D. (2004). Spatially enabling Australia through collaboration and innovation. PSMA Australia Limited, Griffith, ACT, Australia. . Last Accessed October 2007.
45. (PBM SIG) Performance-Based Management Special Interest Group (2001a). The performance-based management handbook. Establishing and maintaining a performance-based management program (Vol. 1). Oak Ridge, TN, USA: US Department of Energy and Oak Ridge Associated Universities.
46. (PBM SIG) Performance-Based Management Special Interest Group (2001b). The performance-based management handbook. Establishing an integrated performance measuring system (Vol. 2). Oak Ridge, TN, USA: US Department of Energy and Oak Ridge Associated Universities.
47. PROMATIS (2006). PCM business performance management. Germany: PROMATIS software GmbH Ettlingen.
48. (PSMO) Public Sector Management Office Western Australia (1997). Preparing performance indicators: A practical guide. Perth, Western Australia. . Last Accessed April 2008.
49. Rajabifard, A. (2002). Diffusion of regional data infrastructures: With particular reference to Asia Pacific. PhD-dissertation, The University of Melbourne.
50. Rajabifard A., Binns A., Masser I., and Williamson I. The role of sub-national government and the private sector in future spatial data infrastructures. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 20 7 (2006) 727-741
51. Reh, J. (2005). Key performance indicators must be key to organizational success. . Last Accessed December 2007.
52. Rogers P. Evaluating complicated and complex programs using theory of change. The Evaluation Exchange XI 2 (2005) 13-14
53. (SADL) Spatial Application Division, Catholic University of Leuven (2005). Spatial data infrastructure in Europe: State of play during 2005. A summary report of activity 5 of a study commissioned by the EC (EUROSTAT & DGENV) in the framework of the INSPIRE initiative. . Last Accessed November 2007.
54. Schmitz, C., & Parsons, B. A. (1999). Everything you ever wanted to know about logic models but were afraid to ask. W.K. Kellogg Foundation. . Last Accessed June 2007.
55. Scriven M. Evaluation ideologies. In: Madaus G.F., and Stufflebeam D.L. (Eds). Evaluation models viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (1983), Kluwer-Nijhoff, Boston, USA 229-260
56. Steudler D. Developing evaluation and performance indicators for SDIs. In: Williamson I., Rajabifard A., and Feeney M.E.F. (Eds). Developing spatial data infrastructures: From concept to reality (2003), Taylor & Francis, London 235-246
57. Stewart, C. (2006). Results-based management accountability framework. GEOIDE/GeoConnections workshop on value/evaluating spatial data infrastructures, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
58. Taylor-Powell, E. (1996). Logic models to enhance program performance. . Last Accessed June 2007.
59. Taylor-Powell E. Evaluating collaboratives: Challenges and practice. The Evaluation Exchange V 2-3 (1999) 6-7
60. (TRADE) Training Resources and Data Exchange (1995). How to measure performance: A handbook of techniques and tools. Oak Ridge, TN, USA: US Department of Energy Defence Program, Oak Ridge Associated Universities.
61. Vandenbroucke, D. (2007). INSPIRE directive: Specific requirements to monitor its implementation. In Proceedings of the workshop on multi-view framework for assess national spatial data infrastructures, May 2007, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
62. (WHO) World Health Organization (2000). Tools for assessing the O&M status of water supply and sanitation in developing countries. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.