Editorial: Reviewer merits and review control in an age of electronic manuscript management systems

ACM Transactions on Information Systems

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2008, Pages

  Marchionini, Gary ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Manuscript management systems; Peer review

Indexed keywords

MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; MANUSCRIPT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; PEER REVIEW; PEER REVIEWS; STRATEGIES AND TOOLS;

MANAGEMENT;

EID: 53849118169     PISSN: 10468188     EISSN: 15582868     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1402256.1402264     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. CURFMAN, G, MORRISSEY, S, ANNAS, G., AND DRAZEN, J. 2008. Peer review in the balance. New England J. Medicine 328, 21. 2276-2277.
2. GRUDIN, J. 2004. Crossing the divide. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interac. 11, 1, 1-25.
3. KENNEDY, D. 2008. Editorial. Confidential review-or Not? Science 319, 5866, 1009.
4. MARCHIONINI, G., SARACEVIC, T., CARROLL, J., KRAFT, D., HERSH, W., MOTHE, J., ZOBEL, J., HERNON, P., AND SCHWARTZ, C. 2007. Reviewer merits. Inform. Proces. Manag., 43, 1, 1-2.
5. MARCHIONINI, G. 2008. Rating reviewers. (Letters). Science, 319, no5868, 1335.