Paradoxes of lay and professional decision making in common law criminal systems

Revue Internationale de Droit Penal

Volumn 72, Issue 1-2, 2001, Pages 579-594

  Jackson, John D ^a,b  

^a Department of School of Law ^*

^b QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 53849104086     PISSN: 02235404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3917/ridp.721.0579     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bell (1997), Complying with European Court of Human Rights Decisions: An Assessment of McCann and Others v UK and Murray v UK in Standing Advisory Commission on Human Rights, Twenty-Second Report, Belfast: HMSO.
2. Criminal Justice Review Group (1998), Review of the Criminal Justice System in Northern Ireland: A Consultation Paper, Belfast: HMSO.
3. DAMASKA (1986), THE FACES OF JUSTICE AND STATE AUTHORITY, New Haven: Yale.
4. Diamond (1990), Revising Images of Public Punitiveness: Sentencing by Lay and Professional English Magistrates, LAW AND SOCIAL INQUIRY 191.
5. Diplock Commission (1972), Report of the Commission to consider legal procedures to deal with terrorist activities in Northern Ireland, London: HMSO.
6. Doran and Glenn (1999), Lay Involvement in Adjudication, Belfast: HMSO (forthcoming).
7. Doran and Jackson (1992), The Judicial Role in Northern Ireland, in Munro and Wasik (eds), SENTENCING, JUDICIAL DISCRETION AND TRAINING, London: Sweet & Maxwell.
8. Doran and Jackson (1995), The Judicial Role in Criminal Cases in Ireland, in Dawson, Greer and Ingram (eds), ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY YEARS OF ISRISH LAW, Belfast: SLS/Sweet & Maxwell.
9. Doran and Jackson (1997), The Case for Jury Waiver [19997] Criminal Law Review 155.
10. GREER AND LECKEY (1999), CORONERS' COURTS IN NORTHERN IRELAND, Belfast: SLS.
11. Hadden (1992), The Law on Inquests in Northern Ireland: Proposals for Reform, in Standing Advisory Commission on Human Rights, Seventeenth Report, Belfast: HMSO.
12. Hadden (2000), Judicial Roles and the Criminal Process during States of Emergency in Doran and Jackson (eds), JUDGING IN CRIMINAL CASES, Oxford: Hart (forthcoming).
13. Jackson (1995), The Value of Jury Trial in ATTWOOLL AND GOLDBERG, CRIMINAL JUSTICE, Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.
14. JACKSON AND DORAN (1995), JUDGE WITHOUT JURY: DSIPLOCK TRIALS IN THE ADVERSARY SYSTEM, Oxford: Clarendon.
15. Jackson and Doran (1997), Judge and Jury: Towards a New Division of Labour, 60 MODERN LAW REVIEW 759.
16. Jackson and Doran (1997), Addressing the Adversarial Deficit in Non-Jury Criminal Trials, 31 ISRAEL LAW REVIEW 645.
17. Jackson, Quinn and O'Malley (1999), The Jury System in Contemporary Ireland, 62 LAW AND CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS 203.
18. Jackson, Wolfe and Quinn (1999), Legislating Against Silence: The Northern Ireland Experience, Belfast: HMSO (forthcoming).
19. Kahn (1991), Restore the Jury? or Reform? Reform? Aren't things bad enough already? SOUTH AFRICAN LAW JOURNAL 672, 679.
20. Lloyd Report (1996), Inquiry into Legislation Against Terrorism, London: HMSO.
21. Lowry (1992), National Security and the Rule of Law, 26 ISRAEL LAW REVIEW 117.
22. MacPherson (1999), Inquiry into the matters arising from the death of Stephen Lawrence on 22 April 1993, London: HMSO.
23. MOODY AND TOMBS (1982), PROSECUTION IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST, Edinburgh: Edinburgh Academic Press.
24. SEEKINGS AND MURRAY (1999), LAY ASSESSORS IN SOUTH AFRICA'S MAGISTRATES' COURTS, Cape Town: Law, Race and Gender Unit, Univeristy of Cape Town.
25. Standing Advisory Commission on Human Rights (1991), Sixteenth Report, Belfast: HMSO.
26. Thaman (2000), New Wine in Old Bottles: The Separation of Questioning of Law and Fact in the New Russian and Spanish Jury Verdicts in Doran and Jackson (eds), JSUDGING IN CRIMINAL CASES, Oxford: Hart (forthcoming).
27. VAN DEN WYNGAERT (1993), CRIMINAL PROCEDURE SYSTEMS IN THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY, London: Butterworths.
28. Vera Institute of Justice (1998), Prosecuting Police Conduct.
29. Vidmar (1999), Foreword: The Common Law Jury, 62 LAW AND CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS 1.