Inguinal hernia: Mesh or no mesh in open repair?;Offene Leistenhernienversorgung: Netz Oder Kein Netz?

Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie

Volumn 133, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 440-445

  Jaenigen, B M ^a   Hopt, U T ^a   Obermaier, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Hernia surgery; Inguinal hernia; Mesh repair; Recurrence

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; INGUINAL HERNIA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECURRENT DISEASE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT;

EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HERNIA, INGUINAL; HUMANS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RECURRENCE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGICAL MESH;

EID: 53849096720     PISSN: 0044409X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1076955     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Barth RJ. Burchard KW, Tosteson A et al. Short-term outcome after mesh or Shouldice herniorrhaphy: A randomized, prospective study. Surgery 1997; 123: 121-126
2. Bringman S. Ramel S. Heikkinen TJ et al. Tension-free inguinal hernia repair: TEP versus mesh-plug versus Lichtenstein. Ann Surg 2003; 237: 142-147
3. Bringman S, Wollert S, Österberg J et al. Three-year results of a randomized clinical trial of lightweight or standard polypropylene mesh in Lichtenstein repair of primary inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 2006; 93: 1056-1059
4. Butters M, Redecke J, Kóninger J. Long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of Shouldice, Lichtenstein and transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repairs. BrJ Surg 2007; 94: 562-565
5. Danielsson P, Isacson S, Hansen MV. Randomized study of Lichtenstein compared with Shouldice inguinal hernia repair by surgeons in training. Eur J Surg 1999; 165: 49-53
6. Eklund A, Rudberg C, Leijonmarck CE et al. Recurrent inguinal hernia: randomized multicenter trial Comparing laparoscopic and Lichtenstein repair. Surg Endosc 2007; 21: 634-640
7. Frey DM, Wildisen A, Hamel CT et al. Randomized clinical trial of Lichtenstein's operation versus mesh plug for inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 2007; 94: 36-41
8. Gerhardus A, Jalilvand N, Heintze C et al. Ein Vergleich verschiedener Chirurgischer Verfahren zur elektiven Leistenhernienoperation bei Erwachsenen - Ein Health Technology Assessment. Health Technology Assessment. Sankt Augustin: Asgard-Verlag; 2003: 15-33
9. Johansson B, Hallerbäck B, Glise H et al. Laparoscopic mesh vs open preperitoneal mesh vs conventional technique for inguinal hernia repair: a randomised multicenter trial (SCUR hernia repair study). Ann Surg 1999; 230: 225-243
10. Kingsnorth AN, Porter CS, Bennet DH et al. Lichtenstein patch or Perfix plug-and-patch in inguinal hernia: A prospective double- blind randomized controlled trial of short- term outcome. Surgery 2000; 127: 276-283
11. KöningerJS, Oster M, Butters M. Leistenhernienversorgung - ein Vergleich gängiger Verfahren. Chirurg 1998; 69: 1340-1344
12. Köninger J, Redecke J, Butters M. Chronic pain after hernia repair: a randomized trial comparing Shouldice, Lichtenstein and TAPP. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2004; 389: 361-365
13. Lammers BJ, Meyer HJ, Huber HG et al. Entwicklungen bei der Leistenhernie vor dem Hintergrund neu eingeführter Eingriffstechniken im Kammerbereich Nordrhein. Chirurg 2001 ; 72: 448-452
14. Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK. The tension-free hernioplasty. Am J Surg 1989; 157: 188-193
15. Nienhuijs SW. van Oort I, Kemmers-Gels ME et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing the Prolene Hernia System, mesh plug repair and Lichtenstein method for open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 2005; 92: 33-38
16. Nilsson H, Stylianidis G, Haapamäki M et al. Mortality after groin hernia surgery. Ann Surg 2007; 245: 656-660
17. Nordin P, Bartelmess P, Jansson C et al. Randomized trial of Lichtenstein versus Shouldice hernia repair in general surgical practice. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 45-49
18. O'Dwyer PJ, Kingsnorth AN, Molloy RG et al. Randomized clinical trial assessing impact of a lightweight or heavyweight mesh on chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 2005; 92: 166-170
19. Post S, Weiss B, Wilier M et al. Randomized trial of lightweight composite mesh for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. BrJ Surg 2004; 91: 44-48
20. Schmedt CG, Sauerland S, Bittner R. Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 2005; 19: 188-199
21. Schumpelick V, Treutner KH, Arlt G. Inguinal hernia repair in adults. Lancet 1994; 344: 375-379
22. Schumpelick V. Editorial - Verfahrenswahl beim Leistenbruch. Chirurg 1997;68: 1239-1240
23. Scott NW, McCormack K, Graham P et al. Open mesh versus non-mesh for repair of femoral and inguinal hernia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002; 4: CD002197
24. Stylopoulos N, Gazelle GS, Rattner DW. A cost-utility analysis of treatment options for inguinal hernia in 1513 008 adult patients. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 180-189
25. Vale L, Ludbrook A, Grant A. Assessing the costs and consequences of laparoscopic vs open methods of groin hernia repair. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 844-849
26. van Veen RN, Wijsmuller AR, Vrijland WW et al. Long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial of non-mesh versus mesh repair of primary inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 2007; 94: 506-510
27. Vrijland WW, van den Tol MP, Luijendijk RW et al. Randomized clinical trial of non-mesh versus mesh repair of primary inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 293-297
28. Weyhe D, Belyaev O, Müller C et al. Improving outcomes in hernia repair by the use of light meshes - a comparison of different implant constructions based on a critical appraisal of the literature. World J Surg 2007; 31: 234-244