SF-36 and the development of new assessment tools for quality of life;O SF-36 e o oesenvolvimento de novas medidas de avaliação de qualidade de vida

Acta Reumatologica Portuguesa

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 127-133

  Campolina, Alessandro Gonçalves ^a   Ciconelli, Rozana Mesquita ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Assessment; Effectiveness; Health economics; Quality of life

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE;

HUMANS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 53749107786     PISSN: 0303464X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Fitzpatrick R, Fletcher A, Gore S, Jones D, Spiegelhalter D, Cox D. Quality of Life Measures in Health Care. I: Applications and Issues in Assessment. BMJ 1992;305:1074-1077.
2. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Health-Related Quality of Life Measures: Literature Review and Proposed Guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 1993;46:1417-1432.
3. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston (MA): The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1993.
4. Garrat AM, Schmidt L, Mackintosh A, Fitzpatrick R. Quality of life measurement: bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures. British Medical Journal 2002;324:1417-1421.
5. Ware JE. SF-36 Health Survey Update. Spine 2000;25: 3130-3139.
6. Ciconelli RM, Ferraz MB, Santos W, Meinão I, Quaresma MR. Tradução para a língua portuguesa e validação do questionário genérico de avaliação de qualidade de vida SF-36 (Brasil SF-36). Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia 1999;39:143-150.
7. Berwick DM, Murphy JM, Goldman PA et al. Performance of a five-item mental health screening test. Medical Care 1991;29:169-176.
8. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Kelie SK. SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Sumary Scales: a user's manual. Boston (MA): The Health Institute, New England Medical Center;1994.
9. Katz JN, Larson MG, Philips CB et al. Comparative measurement sensitivity of shorted longer health status instruments. Medical Care 1992;30:917-925.
10. Lansky D, Butler JBV, Waller FT. Using health status measures in the hospital setting: from acute care to "outcomes management". Medical Care 1992;30:57-73.
11. Phillips RC, Lansky DJ. Outcomes management in heart valve replacement surgery: early experience. J Heart Valve Dis 1992;1:42-50.
12. Beusterien KM, Steinwald B, Ware JE. Usefulness of the SF-36 Health Survey in measuring health outcomes in the depressed elderly. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 1996;9:13-21.
13. Stewart AL, Hays RD, Ware LE. The MOS Short-Form General Health Survey: reliability and validity in a patient population. Medical Care 1988;26:724-735.
14. Okamoto LJ, Noonan M, DeBoisblanc BP et al. Fluticasone prorionate improves quality of life in patients with asthama requiring oral corticosteroids. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1996;76:455-461.
15. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. The SF-12: how to score the SF-12 physical and mental health summary scales. Boston (MA): The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1995.
16. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Dewey JE, Gandk B. How to score and interpret single-item health status measures: a manual for users of the SF-8 Health Survey. Lincoln (RI): Quality Metric Inc; 2001.
17. Bjorner JB, Ware JE. Using modern psychometric methods to measure health outcomes. Medical Outcomes Trust Monitor 1998;3:11-16.
18. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Bjorner JB et al. Applications of computerized adaptative testing (CAT) to the assessment of headache impact. Quality of Life Research 2003;12:935-952
19. Lee TA, Hollingworth W, Sullivan SD. Comparison of directly elicited preference to preferences derived from the SF-36 in adults with asthma. Med Decis Making 2003;23:323-334.
20. Brazier J, Usherwood T, Harper R, Thomas K. Deriving a preference-based single index from the UK SF-36 Health Survey. J Clin Epidemiol 1998;51:1115-1128.
21. Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. Journal of Health Economics 2002;21:271-292.
22. Fryback DG, Lawrence WF, Martin PA, Klein R, Klein BE. Predicting Quality of Well-Being scores from the SF-36: results from the Beaver Dam Health Outcomes Study. Med Decis Making 1997;17:1-9.
23. Shmueli A. Subjective health status and health values in the general population. Med Decis Making 2001;21:105-112.
24. Lundberg L, Johannesson M, Isacson DG, Borgquist L. The relationship between health-state utilities and the SF-12 in a general population. Med Decis Making 1999;19:128-140.
25. Nichol MB, Sengupta N, Globe DR. Evaluating quality-adjusted life years: estimation of the health utility index (HUI2) from the SF-36. Med Decis Making 2001;21:105-112.
26. d'Amorim BD. Avaliação das formas auto-administradas dos questionários MHAQ e SF-12 em pacientes com doenças reumatológica. Tese (Mestrado). São Paulo, 2001.
27. Campolina AG. Avaliação de preferências em artrite reumatóide: uma comparação de métodos derivados do SF-36 com medidas diretas de preferência. Tese (mestrado). São Paulo, 2007.
28. Campolina AG, Torres TM, Martins EP, Ferraz MB, Ciconelli RM. Qualidade de vida em diferentes doenças reumáticas. Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia 2004;44:183.
29. Ferreira PL. Development of the Portuguese version of MOS SF-36. Part I - Cultural and Linguistic Adapatation. Acta Med Port 2000;13:55-66.
30. Ferreira PL. Development of the Portuguese version of MOS SF-36. Part II - Validation Tests. Acta Med Port 2000;13:119-127.
31. Severo M, Santos AC, Lopes C, Barros H. Reliability and validity in measuring physical and mental health construct of the Portuguese version of MOS SF-36. Acta Med Port 2006;19:281-7. Epub 2007 Jan 23.